IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012788.html

Ten simple rules for fostering creativity in research labs

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias C Rillig

Abstract

Research lab groups are hotspots for the education of the next generation of scientists, and making these units work as creatively as possible is essential for solving pressing issues in biology, the environment, and beyond. This article highlights 10 points that can help make labs as creative as possible. Several of these points are about setting up a creative lab culture; others are about fostering group-level creative output, some are more about encouraging creativity of individual team members, or both. While the head of a research group, the principal investigator, plays an important role, this can only be successful in healthy labs where everyone contributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias C Rillig, 2025. "Ten simple rules for fostering creativity in research labs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-7, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012788
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Park & Erin Leahey & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7942), pages 138-144, January.
    2. Terence Lee & Lauren O’Mahony & Pia Lebeck, 2023. "Introduction: Creativity, Innovation and Everyday Dynamics," Springer Books, in: Creativity and Innovation, chapter 0, pages 1-12, Springer.
    3. repec:plo:pcbi00:1007704 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Russell J. Funk, 2025. "Popper’s probability calculus and the decline of scientific disruptiveness," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4801-4807, August.
    2. Orhan, Mehmet A. & van Rossenberg, Yvonne & Bal, P. Matthijs, 2024. "Authorship inequality and elite dominance in management and organizational research: A review of six decades," OSF Preprints tzx92, Center for Open Science.
    3. Xu, Shuo & Wang, Congcong & An, Xin & Deng, Yunkang & Liu, Jianhua, 2025. "Do OpenCitations and Dimensions serve as an alternative to Web of Science for calculating disruption indexes?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    4. Tao Yi & Chaoying Tang, 2025. "Research exploration, collaborative partnerships, and scientific breakthrough: evidence from China’s State Key Laboratories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4423-4464, August.
    5. Ina Ganguli & Jeffrey Lin & Vitaly Meursault & Nicholas Reynolds, 2026. "Spreading Out Across Expanding Idea Space," Working Papers 26-39, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    6. Rajeev K. Goel & João Ricardo Faria, 2024. "Academic publication uncertainty and research behavior," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(8), pages 5607-5614, December.
    7. Wang, Xinpeng & Zhou, Yuan & Dai, Xingliang & Seet, Pi-Shen, 2026. "Digital economy, resource endowment, and disruptive energy technologies: Evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 595-608.
    8. Chiara Franzoni & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2026. "Funding Breakthrough Research: An Update and Research Agenda," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Science: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Dawoon Jeong & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2025. "Mapping product development trajectories: product citation network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4667-4696, August.
    10. Sang Won Han & Henrich R. Greve, 2026. "The Categorical Imperative vs. Linguistic Alignment: Organizations Use Language to Modify Environmental Expectations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 113-131, January.
    11. Sam Arts & Nicola Melluso & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2023. "Beyond Citations: Measuring Novel Scientific Ideas and their Impact in Publication Text," Papers 2309.16437, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    12. David P Baker & Abdul Basit Adeel & Juan José Moradel-Vásquez & Bea Treena Macasaet & Justin J. W. Powell & Julian Prieto & Jennifer Dusdal & Jun Pang & Yuan Chih Fu, 2026. "Deepening and broadening knowledge after the PISA scientific event: bibliometric, semantic network, and expert analyses of scientization in education research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. André Luis Araujo da Fonseca & Paula Castro Pires de Souza Chimenti & Maribel Carvalho Suarez, 2023. "Using deep learning language models as scaffolding tools in interpretive research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 230021-2300.
    14. Dong, Jie & Yang, Chen & Zhang, Hongyan & Zhou, Peng, 2026. "Identifying and understanding disruptive energy technologies: A data-driven integrated approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Yin, Zhixiang & Fan, Ruguo & Wang, Yitong & Yang, Liu, 2026. "Sustainable digital infrastructure and firm-level energy consumption: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    16. Tang, Kun & Li, Baiyang & Zhu, Qiyu & Ma, Lecun, 2024. "Disruptive content, cross agglomeration interaction, and agglomeration replacement: Does cohesion foster strength?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    17. Carvalho, Vasco & Freund, Lukas B., 2026. "Firms as Foragers," CEPR Discussion Papers 21753, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    18. Yue, Hua & Wang, Haiyan & Jin, Peizhen, 2024. "Financial geographic structure and innovation quality: Evidence from Chinese firms amid economic policy uncertainty," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1370-1380.
    19. Yang, Alex Jie & Wu, Linwei & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Hao & Deng, Sanhong, 2023. "The k-step h-index in citation networks at the paper, author, and institution levels," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    20. Zhang, Jia & Wang, Jian & Winnink, Jos & Jong, Simcha, 2025. "Collaboration networks and radical innovation: Two faces of tie strength and structural holes," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.