IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten simple rules for fostering creativity in research labs

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias C Rillig

Abstract

Research lab groups are hotspots for the education of the next generation of scientists, and making these units work as creatively as possible is essential for solving pressing issues in biology, the environment, and beyond. This article highlights 10 points that can help make labs as creative as possible. Several of these points are about setting up a creative lab culture; others are about fostering group-level creative output, some are more about encouraging creativity of individual team members, or both. While the head of a research group, the principal investigator, plays an important role, this can only be successful in healthy labs where everyone contributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias C Rillig, 2025. "Ten simple rules for fostering creativity in research labs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-7, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012788
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Park & Erin Leahey & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7942), pages 138-144, January.
    2. Terence Lee & Lauren O’Mahony & Pia Lebeck, 2023. "Introduction: Creativity, Innovation and Everyday Dynamics," Springer Books, in: Creativity and Innovation, chapter 0, pages 1-12, Springer.
    3. repec:plo:pcbi00:1007704 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Russell J. Funk, 2025. "Popper’s probability calculus and the decline of scientific disruptiveness," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4801-4807, August.
    2. Orhan, Mehmet A. & van Rossenberg, Yvonne & Bal, P. Matthijs, 2024. "Authorship inequality and elite dominance in management and organizational research: A review of six decades," OSF Preprints tzx92, Center for Open Science.
    3. Tao Yi & Chaoying Tang, 2025. "Research exploration, collaborative partnerships, and scientific breakthrough: evidence from China’s State Key Laboratories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4423-4464, August.
    4. Chiara Franzoni & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2025. "Funding Breakthrough Research: An Update and Research Agenda," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Science, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Dawoon Jeong & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2025. "Mapping product development trajectories: product citation network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4667-4696, August.
    6. Sam Arts & Nicola Melluso & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2023. "Beyond Citations: Measuring Novel Scientific Ideas and their Impact in Publication Text," Papers 2309.16437, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    7. André Luis Araujo da Fonseca & Paula Castro Pires de Souza Chimenti & Maribel Carvalho Suarez, 2023. "Using deep learning language models as scaffolding tools in interpretive research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 230021-2300.
    8. Tang, Kun & Li, Baiyang & Zhu, Qiyu & Ma, Lecun, 2024. "Disruptive content, cross agglomeration interaction, and agglomeration replacement: Does cohesion foster strength?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    9. Yue, Hua & Wang, Haiyan & Jin, Peizhen, 2024. "Financial geographic structure and innovation quality: Evidence from Chinese firms amid economic policy uncertainty," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1370-1380.
    10. Yang, Alex Jie & Wu, Linwei & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Hao & Deng, Sanhong, 2023. "The k-step h-index in citation networks at the paper, author, and institution levels," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    11. Zhang, Jia & Wang, Jian & Winnink, Jos & Jong, Simcha, 2025. "Collaboration networks and radical innovation: Two faces of tie strength and structural holes," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    12. Yining Wang & Qiang Wu & Liangyu Li, 2024. "Examining the influence of women scientists on scientific impact and novelty: insights from top business journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 3517-3542, June.
    13. Wang, Cheng-Jun & Yan, Lihan & Cui, Haochuan, 2023. "Unpacking the essential tension of knowledge recombination: Analyzing the impact of knowledge spanning on citation impact and disruptive innovation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    14. Li, Meiling & Wang, Yang & Du, Haifeng & Bai, Aruhan, 2024. "Motivating innovation: The impact of prestigious talent funding on junior scientists," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(9).
    15. Sean Kelty & Raiyan Abdul Baten & Adiba Mahbub Proma & Ehsan Hoque & Johan Bollen & Gourab Ghoshal, 2025. "The innovation trade-off: how following superstars shapes academic novelty," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Zhang, Ming-Ze & Wang, Tang-Rong & Lyu, Peng-Hui & Chen, Qi-Mei & Li, Ze-Xia & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2024. "Impact of gender composition of academic teams on disruptive output," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    17. Katerina Guba, 2024. "Why do sociologists on academic periphery willingly support bibliometric indicators?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 497-518, January.
    18. Jeffrey T. Macher & Christian Rutzer & Rolf Weder, 2023. "The Illusive Slump of Disruptive Patents," Papers 2306.10774, arXiv.org.
    19. Christian Leibel & Lutz Bornmann, 2024. "Specification uncertainty: what the disruption index tells us about the (hidden) multiverse of bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7971-7979, December.
    20. Rosalie L. Tung & Gary Knight & Pervez Ghauri & Shameen Prashantham & Tony Fang, 2023. "Disruptive knowledge in international business research: A pipe dream or attainable target?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(9), pages 1589-1598, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.