IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marked point process variational autoencoder with applications to unsorted spiking activities

Author

Listed:
  • Ryohei Shibue
  • Tomoharu Iwata

Abstract

Spike train modeling across large neural populations is a powerful tool for understanding how neurons code information in a coordinated manner. Recent studies have employed marked point processes in neural population modeling. The marked point process is a stochastic process that generates a sequence of events with marks. Spike train models based on such processes use the waveform features of spikes as marks and express the generative structure of the unsorted spikes without applying spike sorting. In such modeling, the goal is to estimate the joint mark intensity that describes how observed covariates or hidden states (e.g., animal behaviors, animal internal states, and experimental conditions) influence unsorted spikes. A major issue with this approach is that existing joint mark intensity models are not designed to capture high-dimensional and highly nonlinear observations. To address this limitation, we propose a new joint mark intensity model based on a variational autoencoder, capable of representing the dependency structure of unsorted spikes on observed covariates or hidden states in a data-driven manner. Our model defines the joint mark intensity as a latent variable model, where a neural network decoder transforms a shared latent variable into states and marks. With our model, we derive a new log-likelihood lower bound by exploiting the variational evidence lower bound and upper bound (e.g., the χ upper bound) and use this new lower bound for parameter estimation. To demonstrate the strength of this approach, we integrate our model into a state space model with a nonlinear embedding to capture the hidden state dynamics underlying the observed covariates and unsorted spikes. This enables us to reconstruct covariates from unsorted spikes, known as neural decoding. Our model achieves superior performance in prediction and decoding tasks for synthetic data and the spiking activities of place cells.Author summary: Recent neural recording techniques provide simultaneous insights into large neural population activities. This type of data may offer new insights into the mechanisms of high-dimensional and highly nonlinear neural coding, which are not available with small data. The marked point process is a promising tool for modeling neural population activities. This model avoids the preprocessing of spike assignment and directly estimates the generative distribution of neural recordings. However, when analyzing high-dimensional data or nonlinear dynamics underlying the data, developing appropriate parametric models for the marked point process becomes challenging. To address this limitation, we propose a new marked point process model that uses a variational autoencoder. By utilizing the strengths of neural networks, our model automatically estimates the spike generation distribution from neural recordings, enabling us to find its dependence on animal behavior or external stimuli. Our model is also capable of performing neural decoding, a fundamental technique used to reconstruct variables in the outside world from neural population activities. By integrating our model with neural network-based state space models, we can reconstruct animal behavior or external stimuli from unsorted spikes in a data-driven manner. This could help researchers formulate hypotheses regarding the connection between neural population activities and other influencing factors, and design further experiments and analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryohei Shibue & Tomoharu Iwata, 2024. "Marked point process variational autoencoder with applications to unsorted spiking activities," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-31, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012620
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012620
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012620&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohler, G. O. & Short, M. B. & Brantingham, P. J. & Schoenberg, F. P. & Tita, G. E., 2011. "Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 100-108.
    2. James J. Jun & Nicholas A. Steinmetz & Joshua H. Siegle & Daniel J. Denman & Marius Bauza & Brian Barbarits & Albert K. Lee & Costas A. Anastassiou & Alexandru Andrei & Çağatay Aydın & Mladen Barbic &, 2017. "Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity," Nature, Nature, vol. 551(7679), pages 232-236, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2020. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Dewei Wang & Chendi Jiang & Chanseok Park, 2019. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing systems with memory," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 341-360, April.
    3. Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Lu, Ye & Rahbek, Anders & Stærk-Østergaard, Jacob, 2023. "Bootstrap inference for Hawkes and general point processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 133-165.
    4. Mohler, George, 2014. "Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 491-497.
    5. Boswijk, H. Peter & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Yang, Xiye, 2018. "Testing for self-excitation in jumps," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 256-266.
    6. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    7. Sebastian Meyer & Johannes Elias & Michael Höhle, 2012. "A Space–Time Conditional Intensity Model for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Occurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 607-616, June.
    8. Mercuri, Lorenzo & Perchiazzo, Andrea & Rroji, Edit, 2024. "A Hawkes model with CARMA(p,q) intensity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-26.
    9. Thibault Jaisson & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Rough fractional diffusions as scaling limits of nearly unstable heavy tailed Hawkes processes," Papers 1504.03100, arXiv.org.
    10. Ulrich Horst & Wei Xu, 2024. "Functional Limit Theorems for Hawkes Processes," Papers 2401.11495, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    11. Liang Zou & Huihui Tian & Shouliang Guan & Jianfei Ding & Lei Gao & Jinfen Wang & Ying Fang, 2021. "Self-assembled multifunctional neural probes for precise integration of optogenetics and electrophysiology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Mateo Dulce Rubio, 2019. "Predicting criminal behavior with Levy flights using real data from Bogota," Documentos de Trabajo 17347, Quantil.
    13. Lizhen Xu & Jason A. Duan & Andrew Whinston, 2014. "Path to Purchase: A Mutually Exciting Point Process Model for Online Advertising and Conversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1392-1412, June.
    14. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    15. Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness & Ahmed A. Ewees & Hong Fan & Mohamed Abd Elaziz, 2020. "Optimized Forecasting Method for Weekly Influenza Confirmed Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Angelos Dassios & Hongbiao Zhao, 2017. "A Generalized Contagion Process With An Application To Credit Risk," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-33, February.
    17. Maillart, Thomas & Sornette, Didier, 2019. "Aristotle vs. Ringelmann: On superlinear production in open source software," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 964-972.
    18. Andrea Santoro & Federico Battiston & Maxime Lucas & Giovanni Petri & Enrico Amico, 2024. "Higher-order connectomics of human brain function reveals local topological signatures of task decoding, individual identification, and behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Ginger Saltos & Mihaela Cocea, 2017. "An Exploration of Crime Prediction Using Data Mining on Open Data," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1155-1181, September.
    20. Samuel N. Cohen & Robert J. Elliott, 2013. "Filters and smoothers for self-exciting Markov modulated counting processes," Papers 1311.6257, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.