IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007992.html

Brain-optimized extraction of complex sound features that drive continuous auditory perception

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Berezutskaya
  • Zachary V Freudenburg
  • Umut Güçlü
  • Marcel A J van Gerven
  • Nick F Ramsey

Abstract

Understanding how the human brain processes auditory input remains a challenge. Traditionally, a distinction between lower- and higher-level sound features is made, but their definition depends on a specific theoretical framework and might not match the neural representation of sound. Here, we postulate that constructing a data-driven neural model of auditory perception, with a minimum of theoretical assumptions about the relevant sound features, could provide an alternative approach and possibly a better match to the neural responses. We collected electrocorticography recordings from six patients who watched a long-duration feature film. The raw movie soundtrack was used to train an artificial neural network model to predict the associated neural responses. The model achieved high prediction accuracy and generalized well to a second dataset, where new participants watched a different film. The extracted bottom-up features captured acoustic properties that were specific to the type of sound and were associated with various response latency profiles and distinct cortical distributions. Specifically, several features encoded speech-related acoustic properties with some features exhibiting shorter latency profiles (associated with responses in posterior perisylvian cortex) and others exhibiting longer latency profiles (associated with responses in anterior perisylvian cortex). Our results support and extend the current view on speech perception by demonstrating the presence of temporal hierarchies in the perisylvian cortex and involvement of cortical sites outside of this region during audiovisual speech perception.Author summary: A lot remains unknown regarding how the human brain processes sound in a naturalistic setting, for example when talking to a friend or watching a movie. Many theoretical frameworks have been developed in attempt to explain this process, yet we still lack the comprehensive understanding of the brain mechanisms that support continuous auditory processing. Here we present a new type of framework where we seek to explain the brain responses to sound by considering few theoretical assumptions and instead learn about the brain mechanisms of auditory processing with a ‘data-driven’ approach. Our approach is based on applying a deep artificial neural network directly to predicting the brain responses evoked by a soundtrack of a movie. We show that our framework provides good prediction accuracy of the observed neural activity and performs well on novel brain and audio data. In addition, we show that our model learns interpretable auditory features that link well to the observed neural dynamics particularly during speech perception. This framework can easily be applied to external audio and brain data and is therefore unique in its potential to address various questions about auditory perception in a completely data-driven way.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Berezutskaya & Zachary V Freudenburg & Umut Güçlü & Marcel A J van Gerven & Nick F Ramsey, 2020. "Brain-optimized extraction of complex sound features that drive continuous auditory perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007992
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007992&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamed Nili & Cai Wingfield & Alexander Walther & Li Su & William Marslen-Wilson & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2014. "A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. repec:abf:journl:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:24261-24266 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teruaki Kido & Yuko Yotsumoto & Masamichi J. Hayashi, 2025. "Hierarchical representations of relative numerical magnitudes in the human frontoparietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Valentina Krenz & Arjen Alink & Tobias Sommer & Benno Roozendaal & Lars Schwabe, 2023. "Time-dependent memory transformation in hippocampus and neocortex is semantic in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Satoko Amemori & Ann M. Graybiel & Ken-ichi Amemori, 2024. "Cingulate microstimulation induces negative decision-making via reduced top-down influence on primate fronto-cingulo-striatal network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Antonino Greco & Julia Moser & Hubert Preissl & Markus Siegel, 2024. "Predictive learning shapes the representational geometry of the human brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Manoj Kumar & Cameron T Ellis & Qihong Lu & Hejia Zhang & Mihai Capotă & Theodore L Willke & Peter J Ramadge & Nicholas B Turk-Browne & Kenneth A Norman, 2020. "BrainIAK tutorials: User-friendly learning materials for advanced fMRI analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Hamed Nili & Alexander Walther & Arjen Alink & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2020. "Inferring exemplar discriminability in brain representations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Aroma Dabas & Rasmus Bruckner & Heidrun Schultz & Frederik Bergmann & Roland G. Benoit, 2025. "Learning from imagined experiences via an endogenous prediction error," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Katherine R. Storrs & Barton L. Anderson & Roland W. Fleming, 2021. "Unsupervised learning predicts human perception and misperception of gloss," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 1402-1417, October.
    9. Agustin Lage-Castellanos & Giancarlo Valente & Elia Formisano & Federico De Martino, 2019. "Methods for computing the maximum performance of computational models of fMRI responses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Sreejan Kumar & Theodore R. Sumers & Takateru Yamakoshi & Ariel Goldstein & Uri Hasson & Kenneth A. Norman & Thomas L. Griffiths & Robert D. Hawkins & Samuel A. Nastase, 2024. "Shared functional specialization in transformer-based language models and the human brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Ming Bo Cai & Nicolas W Schuck & Jonathan W Pillow & Yael Niv, 2019. "Representational structure or task structure? Bias in neural representational similarity analysis and a Bayesian method for reducing bias," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, May.
    12. Cai Wingfield & Li Su & Xunying Liu & Chao Zhang & Phil Woodland & Andrew Thwaites & Elisabeth Fonteneau & William D Marslen-Wilson, 2017. "Relating dynamic brain states to dynamic machine states: Human and machine solutions to the speech recognition problem," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Nishal P. Shah & Donald Avansino & Foram Kamdar & Claire Nicolas & Anastasia Kapitonava & Carlos Vargas-Irwin & Leigh R. Hochberg & Chethan Pandarinath & Krishna V. Shenoy & Francis R. Willett & Jaimi, 2025. "Pseudo-linear summation explains neural geometry of multi-finger movements in human premotor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Michael F Bonner & Russell A Epstein, 2018. "Computational mechanisms underlying cortical responses to the affordance properties of visual scenes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Sebastian P. H. Speer & Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo & Lily Tsoi & Shannon M. Burns & Emily B. Falk & Diana I. Tamir, 2024. "Hyperscanning shows friends explore and strangers converge in conversation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Máté Aller & Agoston Mihalik & Uta Noppeney, 2022. "Audiovisual adaptation is expressed in spatial and decisional codes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Jörn Diedrichsen & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2017. "Representational models: A common framework for understanding encoding, pattern-component, and representational-similarity analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-33, April.
    18. Haider Al-Tahan & Yalda Mohsenzadeh, 2021. "Reconstructing feedback representations in the ventral visual pathway with a generative adversarial autoencoder," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Benjamin Lahner & Kshitij Dwivedi & Polina Iamshchinina & Monika Graumann & Alex Lascelles & Gemma Roig & Alessandro Thomas Gifford & Bowen Pan & SouYoung Jin & N. Apurva Ratan Murty & Kendrick Kay & , 2024. "Modeling short visual events through the BOLD moments video fMRI dataset and metadata," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    20. Annika Garlichs & Helen Blank, 2024. "Prediction error processing and sharpening of expected information across the face-processing hierarchy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.