IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clusternomics: Integrative context-dependent clustering for heterogeneous datasets

Author

Listed:
  • Evelina Gabasova
  • John Reid
  • Lorenz Wernisch

Abstract

Integrative clustering is used to identify groups of samples by jointly analysing multiple datasets describing the same set of biological samples, such as gene expression, copy number, methylation etc. Most existing algorithms for integrative clustering assume that there is a shared consistent set of clusters across all datasets, and most of the data samples follow this structure. However in practice, the structure across heterogeneous datasets can be more varied, with clusters being joined in some datasets and separated in others. In this paper, we present a probabilistic clustering method to identify groups across datasets that do not share the same cluster structure. The proposed algorithm, Clusternomics, identifies groups of samples that share their global behaviour across heterogeneous datasets. The algorithm models clusters on the level of individual datasets, while also extracting global structure that arises from the local cluster assignments. Clusters on both the local and the global level are modelled using a hierarchical Dirichlet mixture model to identify structure on both levels. We evaluated the model both on simulated and on real-world datasets. The simulated data exemplifies datasets with varying degrees of common structure. In such a setting Clusternomics outperforms existing algorithms for integrative and consensus clustering. In a real-world application, we used the algorithm for cancer subtyping, identifying subtypes of cancer from heterogeneous datasets. We applied the algorithm to TCGA breast cancer dataset, integrating gene expression, miRNA expression, DNA methylation and proteomics. The algorithm extracted clinically meaningful clusters with significantly different survival probabilities. We also evaluated the algorithm on lung and kidney cancer TCGA datasets with high dimensionality, again showing clinically significant results and scalability of the algorithm.Author summary: Integrative clustering is the task of identifying groups of samples by combining information from several datasets. An example of this task is cancer subtyping, where we cluster tumour samples based on several datasets, such as gene expression, proteomics and others. Most existing algorithms assume that all such datasets share a similar cluster structure, with samples outside these clusters treated as noise. The structure can, however, be much more heterogeneous: some meaningful clusters may appear only in some datasets. In the paper, we introduce the Clusternomics algorithm that identifies groups of samples across heterogeneous datasets. It models both cluster structure of individual datasets, and the global structure that appears as a combination of local structures. The algorithm uses probabilistic modelling to identify the groups and share information across the local and global levels. We evaluated the algorithm on both simulated and real world datasets, where the algorithm found clinically significant clusters with different survival outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelina Gabasova & John Reid & Lorenz Wernisch, 2017. "Clusternomics: Integrative context-dependent clustering for heterogeneous datasets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005781
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005781
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005781&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronglai Shen & Qianxing Mo & Nikolaus Schultz & Venkatraman E Seshan & Adam B Olshen & Jason Huse & Marc Ladanyi & Chris Sander, 2012. "Integrative Subtype Discovery in Glioblastoma Using iCluster," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Peter J. Green & Sylvia Richardson, 2001. "Modelling Heterogeneity With and Without the Dirichlet Process," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 28(2), pages 355-375, June.
    3. Teh, Yee Whye & Jordan, Michael I. & Beal, Matthew J. & Blei, David M., 2006. "Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1566-1581, December.
    4. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    5. Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4648 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathan Cunningham & Jim E. Griffin & David L. Wild, 2020. "ParticleMDI: particle Monte Carlo methods for the cluster analysis of multiple datasets with applications to cancer subtype identification," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 463-484, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Redivo, Edoardo & Nguyen, Hien D. & Gupta, Mayetri, 2020. "Bayesian clustering of skewed and multimodal data using geometric skewed normal distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Yuan Fang & Dimitris Karlis & Sanjeena Subedi, 2022. "Infinite Mixtures of Multivariate Normal-Inverse Gaussian Distributions for Clustering of Skewed Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 510-552, November.
    3. J. Griffin, 2011. "Bayesian clustering of distributions in stochastic frontier analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 275-283, December.
    4. Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter & Gertraud Malsiner-Walli, 2019. "From here to infinity: sparse finite versus Dirichlet process mixtures in model-based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 33-64, March.
    5. Zhiguang Huo & Li Zhu & Tianzhou Ma & Hongcheng Liu & Song Han & Daiqing Liao & Jinying Zhao & George Tseng, 2020. "Two-Way Horizontal and Vertical Omics Integration for Disease Subtype Discovery," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Carter Allen & Yuzhou Chang & Brian Neelon & Won Chang & Hang J. Kim & Zihai Li & Qin Ma & Dongjun Chung, 2023. "A Bayesian multivariate mixture model for high throughput spatial transcriptomics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1775-1787, September.
    7. Congdon, P., 2007. "Bayesian modelling strategies for spatially varying regression coefficients: A multivariate perspective for multiple outcomes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 2586-2601, February.
    8. Cai, Bo & Meyer, Renate, 2011. "Bayesian semiparametric modeling of survival data based on mixtures of B-spline distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1260-1272, March.
    9. Crook Oliver M. & Gatto Laurent & Kirk Paul D. W., 2019. "Fast approximate inference for variable selection in Dirichlet process mixtures, with an application to pan-cancer proteomics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Marco Berrettini & Giuliano Galimberti & Saverio Ranciati, 2023. "Semiparametric finite mixture of regression models with Bayesian P-splines," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(3), pages 745-775, September.
    11. C. Yau & O. Papaspiliopoulos & G. O. Roberts & C. Holmes, 2011. "Bayesian non‐parametric hidden Markov models with applications in genomics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(1), pages 37-57, January.
    12. Victor Muthama Musau & Carlo Gaetan & Paolo Girardi, 2022. "Clustering of bivariate satellite time series: A quantile approach," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), November.
    13. Sanjeena Subedi & Paul D. McNicholas, 2021. "A Variational Approximations-DIC Rubric for Parameter Estimation and Mixture Model Selection Within a Family Setting," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(1), pages 89-108, April.
    14. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    15. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    16. Alicja Grześkowiak, 2016. "Assessment of Participation in Cultural Activities in Poland by Selected Multivariate Methods," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, January -.
    17. Yunpeng Zhao & Qing Pan & Chengan Du, 2019. "Logistic regression augmented community detection for network data with application in identifying autism‐related gene pathways," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 222-234, March.
    18. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    20. Francois Olivier & Laval Guillaume, 2011. "Deviance Information Criteria for Model Selection in Approximate Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.