IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pcz/journl/v10y2014i1p204-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Methodology Of Polish National Multiyear Research Programme In The Area Of Technical Solutions – Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ludmi³a Walaszczyk

    (Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji – Pañstwowy Instytut Badawczy in Radom.)

Abstract

TThe article provides the results of the practical application of evaluation methodology in the Development of Innovative Systems of Manufacturing and Maintenance 2004-2008 (PW-004) multiyear strategic research programme in the area of technical solutions. Findings from this study indicate the evaluation criteria and methods used at different stages and levels of evaluation – project, thematic area and the entire programme levels. The author indicates the importance of the evaluation process, which contributed to the achievement of the practical results in the programme. However, the author also underlines shortcomings of the methodology and identifies additional elements needed to make the evaluation methodology complex.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludmi³a Walaszczyk, 2014. "Evaluation Methodology Of Polish National Multiyear Research Programme In The Area Of Technical Solutions – Case Study," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 10(1), pages 204-213, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:204-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pjms.zim.pcz.pl/files/Evaluation-Methodology-of-Polish-National-Multiyear-Research-Programme-in-the-Area-of-Technical-Solutions-a---Case-Study.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.pjms.zim.pcz.pl/evaluation-methodology-of-polish-national-multiyear-research-programme-in-the-area-of-technical-solutions---case-study.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ray Hudson, 2011. "From Knowledge-based Economy to … Knowledge-based Economy? Reflections on Changes in the Economy and Development Policies in the North East of England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 997-1012.
    2. Bjorn Asheim & Lars Coenen & Jerker Moodysson & Jan Vang, 2007. "Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: implications for regional innovation policy," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3/4/5), pages 140-155.
    3. Peter Ingwersen & Birger Larsen, 2007. "Evaluation of strategic research programs: the case of Danish environmental research 1993–2002," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 47-57, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rehák Štefan & Buček Milan & Hudec Oto, 2013. "Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 52-66, October.
    2. Veldhuizen, Caroline, 2020. "Smart Specialisation as a transition management framework: Driving sustainability-focused regional innovation policy?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    3. Antonioli,Davide & Marzucchi,Alberto & Montresor,Sandro, 2012. "Regional innovation policy and innovative behaviours. A propensity score matching evaluation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201205, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    4. Roper, Stephen & Love, James H. & Bonner, Karen, 2017. "Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 43-56.
    5. Arthur Vankan & Koen Frenken & Carolina Castaldi, 2014. "Designing for a Living? Income Determinants Among Firm Founders in the Dutch Design Sector," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 117-140, February.
    6. Andrey Paptsov & Vasiliy Nechaev & Pavel Valerievich Mikhailushkin, 2019. "Towards to a single innovation space in the agrarian sector of the member states of the Eurasian economic union: a case study," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 637-648, September.
    7. Ron Boschma, 2014. "Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 51-68.
    8. Mikel Navarro Arancegui & Juan José Gibaja Martíns & Susana Franco Rodríguez & Asier Murciego Alonso, 2012. "Territorial Benchmarking Methodology: The Need to Identify Reference Regions," Chapters, in: Philip Cooke & Mario Davide Parrilli & José Luis Curbelo (ed.), Innovation, Global Change and Territorial Resilience, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Heidi Aslesen & Arne Isaksen & James Karlsen, 2012. "Modes of Innovation and Differentiated Responses to Globalisation—A Case Study of Innovation Modes in the Agder Region, Norway," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(4), pages 389-405, December.
    10. Armand Djoumessi & Shu-Ling Chen & Stephen Cahoon, 2019. "Deconstructing Lawson And Samson’S Concept Of Innovation Capability: A Critical Assessment And A Refinement," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-31, August.
    11. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1223-1241, August.
    12. Stefan Lüthi & Alain Thierstein & Michael Hoyler, 2015. "The world city network: national versus global perspective," ERSA conference papers ersa15p66, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Michael Fritsch & Ronney Aamoucke, 2017. "Fields of knowledge in higher education institutions, and innovative start-ups: An empirical investigation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 1-27, March.
    14. Michael Fritsch & Mirko Titze & Matthias Piontek, 2018. "Knowledge Interactions in Regional Innovation Networks: Comparing Data Sources," Jena Economics Research Papers 2018-003, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    15. Skokan, Karel & Rumpel, Petr, 2007. "Constructing Regional Advantage: Does it matter for Czech regions?," MPRA Paper 12378, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Rehfeld, Dieter & Terstriep, Judith, 2013. "Regionale Innovationssysteme: 20 Jahre "Regional Innovation System Studies"," Forschung Aktuell 11/2013, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    17. Pina, Katia & Tether, Bruce S., 2016. "Towards understanding variety in knowledge intensive business services by distinguishing their knowledge bases," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 401-413.
    18. Danielle Galliano & Simon Nadel & Pierre Triboulet, 2023. "The geography of environmental innovation: a rural/urban comparison," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 27-59, August.
    19. Pedro López-Rubio & Norat Roig-Tierno & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2020. "Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Camboim, Guilherme Freitas & Zawislak, Paulo Antônio & Pufal, Nathália Amarante, 2019. "Driving elements to make cities smarter: Evidences from European projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 154-167.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:204-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Bajdor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzpczpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.