IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04961-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do people really think about the RSV vaccine? Study of unsolicited text replies from adults over 60

Author

Listed:
  • E. Susanne Blazek

    (Stripe)

  • Sarah Deedat

    (Behavioral Reinforcement Learning Lab (BReLL))

  • Olivia Kinney

    (Kroger Health)

  • Allison M. Londerée

    (Behavioral Reinforcement Learning Lab (BReLL))

  • Stacey Frede

    (Kroger Health)

  • Amy Bucher

    (Behavioral Reinforcement Learning Lab (BReLL))

Abstract

A digital health intervention (DHI) using SMS precision nudging to drive RSV vaccine uptake among adults over 60 was launched with a large community pharmacy chain in 2023, two months after the vaccine’s FDA approval for adult administration in the United States. Tens of thousands of patients texted back. In this exploratory investigation, we employed thematic analysis and structural topic modelling to extract topics (e.g., Kind declines, Moral disgust, etc.), sentiment (negative to positive), and function (emotional to practical) expressed in the text replies in order to understand patient attitudes and behavioural determinants of RSV vaccination. The analyses reveal 10 topics from the thematic analysis and 30 more granular topics from the structural topic modelling. Expressed attitudes shifted over the course of the DHI, with less negativity later in the intervention. People who did not receive the flu vaccine and people with commercial insurance responded more frequently that they would not get vaccinated. Specific behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were associated with overall replies and specific topics. Framing intervention messages with information about emotional consequences elicited the highest proportion of replies; framing with anticipated regret elicited the lowest proportion. We extend previous work by leveraging unsolicited replies to analyse public attitudes toward a new vaccine, with implications for future RSV and other vaccine interventions at pharmacies and elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Susanne Blazek & Sarah Deedat & Olivia Kinney & Allison M. Londerée & Stacey Frede & Amy Bucher, 2025. "What do people really think about the RSV vaccine? Study of unsolicited text replies from adults over 60," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04961-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04961-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04961-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04961-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianghao Wang & Yichun Fan & Juan Palacios & Yuchen Chai & Nicolas Guetta-Jeanrenaud & Nick Obradovich & Chenghu Zhou & Siqi Zheng, 2022. "Global evidence of expressed sentiment alterations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(3), pages 349-358, March.
    2. Aleksandra M Golos & Sharath Chandra Guntuku & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Lindsey J Leininger & Amanda M Simanek & Aparna Kumar & Sandra S Albrecht & Jennifer Beam Dowd & Malia Jones & Alison M Buttenheim, 2023. "Dear Pandemic: A topic modeling analysis of COVID-19 information needs among readers of an online science communication campaign," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Björn Lindström & Martin Bellander & David T. Schultner & Allen Chang & Philippe N. Tobler & David M. Amodio, 2021. "A computational reward learning account of social media engagement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou, 2011. "Sentiment in Twitter events," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(2), pages 406-418, February.
    5. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou, 2011. "Sentiment in Twitter events," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(2), pages 406-418, February.
    6. Chelsea L. Ratcliff & Jakob D. Jensen & Courtney L. Scherr & Melinda Krakow & Kaylee Crossley, 2019. "Loss/Gain Framing, Dose, and Reactance: A Message Experiment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2640-2652, December.
    7. Björn Lindström & Martin Bellander & David T. Schultner & Allen Chang & Philippe N. Tobler & David M. Amodio, 2021. "Publisher Correction: A computational reward learning account of social media engagement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, December.
    8. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Jie & Tse, Ying Kei & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Minhao, 2019. "Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – An empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 192-205.
    2. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Diana Maynard & Gerhard Gossen & Adam Funk & Marco Fisichella, 2014. "Should I Care about Your Opinion? Detection of Opinion Interestingness and Dynamics in Social Media," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Ashish Kumar Rathore & Santanu Das & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, 2018. "Social Media Data Inputs in Product Design: Case of a Smartphone," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(3), pages 255-272, September.
    5. Karin Sim Smith & Richard McCreadie & Craig Macdonald & Iadh Ounis, 2018. "Regional Sentiment Bias in Social Media Reporting During Crises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1013-1025, October.
    6. Beatriz Barros & Ana Fernández-Zubieta & Raul Fidalgo-Merino & Francisco Triguero, 2018. "Scientific knowledge percolation process and social impact: A case study on the biotechnology and microbiology perceptions on Twitter," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(6), pages 804-814.
    7. Lipizzi, Carlo & Iandoli, Luca & Ramirez Marquez, José Emmanuel, 2015. "Extracting and evaluating conversational patterns in social media: A socio-semantic analysis of customers’ reactions to the launch of new products using Twitter streams," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 490-503.
    8. Chaney, Damien & Brassier, Pascal, 2024. "Destruction of heritage, community and anthropomorphism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. repec:cdl:globco:qt53n4q35z is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Thomas T. Hills & Eugenio Proto & Daniel Sgroi & Chanuki Illushka Seresinhe, 2019. "Historical analysis of national subjective wellbeing using millions of digitized books," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(12), pages 1271-1275, December.
    11. Ping-Yu Hsu & Hong-Tsuen Lei & Shih-Hsiang Huang & Teng Hao Liao & Yao-Chung Lo & Chin-Chun Lo, 2019. "Effects of sentiment on recommendations in social network," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 253-262, June.
    12. Widmar, Nicole Olynk & Bir, Courtney & Clifford, McKenna & Slipchenko, Natalya, 2020. "Social media sentimentas an additional performance measure? Examples from iconic theme park destinations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Mahsa Amiri & Hajar Sotudeh, 2025. "Comparative opinion mining of tweets on retracted papers and their valid peers: a semi-experimental follow-up," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 1159-1179, February.
    14. Stefan Stieglitz & Christian Meske & Björn Ross & Milad Mirbabaie, 2020. "Going Back in Time to Predict the Future - The Complex Role of the Data Collection Period in Social Media Analytics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 395-409, April.
    15. Mahsa Amiri & Maryam Yaghtin & Hajar Sotudeh, 2024. "How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 261-287, January.
    16. Neu, Dean & Saxton, Greg & Rahaman, Abu & Everett, Jeffery, 2019. "Twitter and social accountability: Reactions to the Panama Papers," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 38-53.
    17. Dhiraj Murthy, 2017. "Comparative Process-oriented Research Using Social Media and Historical Text," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 3-26, December.
    18. Herbst, Chris M. & Desouza, Kevin C. & Alashri, Saud & Kandala, Srinivasa Srivatsav & Khullar, Mayank & Bajaj, Vikash, 2018. "What Do Parents Value in a Child Care Provider? Evidence from Yelp Consumer Reviews," IZA Discussion Papers 11741, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Dibya Nandan Mishra & Rajeev Kumar Panda, 2023. "Decoding customer experiences in rail transport service: application of hybrid sentiment analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-60, March.
    20. Zavala, Araceli & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2019. "Visual analytics for identifying product disruptions and effects via social media," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 544-559.
    21. Szymkowiak, Andrzej & Madias, Konstantinos & Garczarek-Bak, Urszula Anna, 2025. "Risk, reward, and recognition: The influence of safety perception on viral challenge participation on social media," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04961-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.