IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0281773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dear Pandemic: A topic modeling analysis of COVID-19 information needs among readers of an online science communication campaign

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra M Golos
  • Sharath Chandra Guntuku
  • Rachael Piltch-Loeb
  • Lindsey J Leininger
  • Amanda M Simanek
  • Aparna Kumar
  • Sandra S Albrecht
  • Jennifer Beam Dowd
  • Malia Jones
  • Alison M Buttenheim

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was accompanied by an “infodemic”–an overwhelming excess of accurate, inaccurate, and uncertain information. The social media-based science communication campaign Dear Pandemic was established to address the COVID-19 infodemic, in part by soliciting submissions from readers to an online question box. Our study characterized the information needs of Dear Pandemic’s readers by identifying themes and longitudinal trends among question box submissions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of questions submitted from August 24, 2020, to August 24, 2021. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling to identify 25 topics among the submissions, then used thematic analysis to interpret the topics based on their top words and submissions. We used t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding to visualize the relationship between topics, and we used generalized additive models to describe trends in topic prevalence over time. Results: We analyzed 3839 submissions, 90% from United States-based readers. We classified the 25 topics into 6 overarching themes: ‘Scientific and Medical Basis of COVID-19,’ ‘COVID-19 Vaccine,’ ‘COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies,’ ‘Society and Institutions,’ ‘Family and Personal Relationships,’ and ‘Navigating the COVID-19 Infodemic.’ Trends in topics about viral variants, vaccination, COVID-19 mitigation strategies, and children aligned with the news cycle and reflected the anticipation of future events. Over time, vaccine-related submissions became increasingly related to those surrounding social interaction. Conclusions: Question box submissions represented distinct themes that varied in prominence over time. Dear Pandemic’s readers sought information that would not only clarify novel scientific concepts, but would also be timely and practical to their personal lives. Our question box format and topic modeling approach offers science communicators a robust methodology for tracking, understanding, and responding to the information needs of online audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra M Golos & Sharath Chandra Guntuku & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Lindsey J Leininger & Amanda M Simanek & Aparna Kumar & Sandra S Albrecht & Jennifer Beam Dowd & Malia Jones & Alison M Buttenheim, 2023. "Dear Pandemic: A topic modeling analysis of COVID-19 information needs among readers of an online science communication campaign," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281773
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281773
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281773&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0281773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manierre, Matthew J., 2015. "Gaps in knowledge: Tracking and explaining gender differences in health information seeking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 151-158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krishnatri, Vinayak & Vellakkal, Sukumar, 2024. "Does affordable Internet promote maternal and child healthcare access? Evidence from a post-telecommunication market disruption period in India," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    2. Muhammad Imran & Umair Qazi & Ferda Ofli, 2022. "TBCOV: Two Billion Multilingual COVID-19 Tweets with Sentiment, Entity, Geo, and Gender Labels," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Silvia Gallegati & Luca Aquilanti & Valerio Temperini & Gloria Polinesi & Giorgio Rappelli, 2021. "The Impact of Coronavirus Information-Seeking Behavior on Dental Care Access: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Rino Falcone & Alessandro Sapienza, 2020. "How COVID-19 Changed the Information Needs of Italian Citizens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Seçkin, Gül, 2020. "Expansion of Parson's sick role into cyberspace: Patient information consumerism and subjective health in a representative sample of U.S. internet users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Adrienne B. Lent & Carlos O. Garrido & Emily H. Baird & Ruta Viela & Robin B. Harris, 2022. "Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health and Life Insurance Denial Due to Cancer among Cancer Survivors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Ruben L Bach & Alexander Wenz, 2020. "Studying health-related internet and mobile device use using web logs and smartphone records," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Veronica Gallinoro & Andrea Guida & Chiara Morittu & Valerio Ferro Allodola & Vieri Lastrucci & Patrizio Zanobini & Orkan Okan & Kevin Dadaczynski & Chiara Lorini, 2023. "Digital Health Literacy and Information-Seeking in the Era of COVID-19: Gender Differences Emerged from a Florentine University Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Rachael Piltch‐Loeb & Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher & Victoria A. Shaffer & Laura D. Scherer & Megan Knaus & Angie Fagerlin & David M. Abramson & Aaron M. Scherer, 2019. "Cross‐Sectional Psychological and Demographic Associations of Zika Knowledge and Conspiracy Beliefs Before and After Local Zika Transmission," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2683-2693, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.