IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04716-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the longevity of resources shared in scientific publications

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel E. Acuna

    (University of Colorado at Boulder)

  • Jian Jian

    (NetApp)

  • Tong Zeng

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Lizhen Liang

    (Syracuse University)

  • Han Zhuang

    (Ningbo Institute of Digital Twin, Eastern Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Research has shown that most resources shared in articles (e.g., URLs to code or data) are not kept up to date and mostly disappear from the web after some years (Zeng et al., 2019). Little is known about the factors that differentiate and predict the longevity of these resources. This article explores a range of explanatory features related to the publication venue, authors, references, and where the resource is shared. We analyze an extensive repository of publications and, through web archival services, reconstruct how they looked at different time points. We discover that the most important factors are related to where and how the resource is shared, while surprisingly little consideration is given to the author’s reputation or prestige of the journal. By examining the places where long-lasting resources are shared, we suggest that it is critical to educate researchers on modern sharing technologies. Finally, we discuss implications for reproducibility and acknowledge scientific datasets as first-class citizens of science.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel E. Acuna & Jian Jian & Tong Zeng & Lizhen Liang & Han Zhuang, 2025. "Predicting the longevity of resources shared in scientific publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04716-z
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04716-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04716-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04716-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Gazni & Fereshteh Didegah, 2011. "Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(2), pages 251-265, May.
    2. Sílvia Bonàs-Guarch & Marta Guindo-Martínez & Irene Miguel-Escalada & Niels Grarup & David Sebastian & Elias Rodriguez-Fos & Friman Sánchez & Mercè Planas-Fèlix & Paula Cortes-Sánchez & Santi González, 2018. "Re-analysis of public genetic data reveals a rare X-chromosomal variant associated with type 2 diabetes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Benjamin Haibe-Kains & George Alexandru Adam & Ahmed Hosny & Farnoosh Khodakarami & Levi Waldron & Bo Wang & Chris McIntosh & Anna Goldenberg & Anshul Kundaje & Casey S. Greene & Tamara Broderick & Mi, 2020. "Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 14-16, October.
    4. Martin Klein & Herbert Van de Sompel & Robert Sanderson & Harihar Shankar & Lyudmila Balakireva & Ke Zhou & Richard Tobin, 2014. "Scholarly Context Not Found: One in Five Articles Suffers from Reference Rot," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-39, December.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0020885 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Michael P. Milham & R. Cameron Craddock & Jake J. Son & Michael Fleischmann & Jon Clucas & Helen Xu & Bonhwang Koo & Anirudh Krishnakumar & Bharat B. Biswal & F. Xavier Castellanos & Stan Colcombe & A, 2018. "Assessment of the impact of shared brain imaging data on the scientific literature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michaela Strinzel & Josh Brown & Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner & Sarah Rijcke & Michael Hill, 2021. "Ten ways to improve academic CVs for fairer research assessment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    2. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    3. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    4. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Matthias Weber, 2016. "The Effects of Listing Authors in Alphabetical Order: A survey of the Empirical Evidence," Bank of Lithuania Occasional Paper Series 12, Bank of Lithuania.
    6. Kong, Ling & Wang, Dongbo, 2020. "Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    7. Lin Zhang & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2012. "Where demographics meets scientometrics: towards a dynamic career analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 617-630, May.
    8. Petr Praus, 2025. "A note on the topic of single-author articles in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 3071-3088, May.
    9. Takaaki Onaga & Masaki Fujita & Yoshinobu Kano, 2024. "Contribution Analysis of Large Language Models and Data Augmentations for Person Names in Solving Legal Bar Examination at COLIEE 2023," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 123-143, April.
    10. Javier Martínez-Vega & David Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2022. "Protected Area Effectiveness in the Scientific Literature: A Decade-Long Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Xia Fan & Xiaowan Yang & Liming Chen, 2015. "Diversified resources and academic influence: patterns of university–industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(2), pages 489-509, August.
    12. Ha, Jinkyung & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2024. "A systematic review of mobile payment literature: What has been studied and what should be studied?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    13. Jun-Ping Qiu & Ke Dong & Hou-Qiang Yu, 2014. "Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1345-1360, November.
    14. María Bordons & Borja González-Albo & Javier Aparicio & Luz Moreno, 2015. "The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1385-1400, February.
    15. Yue Wang & Ning Li & Bin Zhang & Qian Huang & Jian Wu & Yang Wang, 2023. "The effect of structural holes on producing novel and disruptive research in physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1801-1823, March.
    16. Ping Ni & Xinying An, 2018. "Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 863-877, August.
    17. Igna, Ioana & Venturini, Francesco, 2023. "The determinants of AI innovation across European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    18. Chi, Yuxue & Tang, Xianyi & Liu, Yijun, 2022. "Exploring the “awakening effect” in knowledge diffusion: a case study of publications in the library and information science domain," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    19. Gómez-Ferri, Javier & González-Alcaide, Gregorio & LLopis-Goig, Ramón, 2019. "Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    20. Mike Thelwall & Tamara Nevill, 2019. "No evidence of citation bias as a determinant of STEM gender disparities in US biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1793-1801, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04716-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.