IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04472-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social bots shape public issue networks in China’s dual-carbon agenda: a network analysis using MRQAP

Author

Listed:
  • Han Lin

    (Centre for Chinese Urbanization Studies of Soochow University & Collaborative Innovation Center for New Urbanization and Social Governance of Universities
    Soochow University)

  • Menghan Zhang

    (Centre for Chinese Urbanization Studies of Soochow University & Collaborative Innovation Center for New Urbanization and Social Governance of Universities
    Soochow University)

  • Xue Qi

    (Soochow University)

  • Wenqian Shen

    (Soochow University)

Abstract

Despite growing recognition of social bots’ role in swaying public opinion, evidence of their specific impact on public cognition remains limited. Applying the network agenda-setting theory and multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MRQAP) analysis of X (formerly Twitter) posts, we examine the relative impact of social bots and legacy media on public agenda networks over time, focusing on China’s dual-carbon policy. Findings reveal that social bots’ agenda networks exert a significant influence on public agenda networks, with their impact being more pronounced than that of legacy media during the initial period (T1). However, this influence diminishes in the subsequent period (T2), suggesting that social bots have a potent yet short-lived effect on shaping public cognitive networks around specific issues. Furthermore, social bots exhibited more negative attitudes towards dual-carbon topics, contrasting with the neutral stance of legacy media. A comparative semantic network analysis highlights the distinct narrative structures promoted by social bots and legacy media. This research provides crucial insights into automated actors’ roles in molding environmental discourse and public perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Lin & Menghan Zhang & Xue Qi & Wenqian Shen, 2025. "Social bots shape public issue networks in China’s dual-carbon agenda: a network analysis using MRQAP," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04472-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04472-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04472-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04472-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Björn Ross & Laura Pilz & Benjamin Cabrera & Florian Brachten & German Neubaum & Stefan Stieglitz, 2019. "Are social bots a real threat? An agent-based model of the spiral of silence to analyse the impact of manipulative actors in social networks," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 394-412, July.
    2. Thomas Marlow & Sean Miller & J. Timmons Roberts, 2021. "Bots and online climate discourses: Twitter discourse on President Trump’s announcement of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 765-777, July.
    3. David Dekker & David Krackhardt & Tom Snijders, 2007. "Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 563-581, December.
    4. Menghan Zhang & Xue Qi & Xinyan Liu & Ke Zhang, 2024. "Who Leads? Who Follows? Exploring Agenda Setting by Media, Social Bots and Public in the Discussion of the 2022 South Korean Presidential Election," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    5. Warren Pearce & Sabine Niederer & Suay Melisa Özkula & Natalia Sánchez Querubín, 2019. "The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), March.
    6. Chengcheng Shao & Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia & Onur Varol & Kai-Cheng Yang & Alessandro Flammini & Filippo Menczer, 2018. "The spread of low-credibility content by social bots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suzanne Elayan & Martin Sykora, 2024. "Digital intermediaries in pandemic times: social media and the role of bots in communicating emotions and stress about Coronavirus," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2481-2504, December.
    2. Zixuan Weng & Aijun Lin, 2022. "Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Kai-Cheng Yang & Emilio Ferrara & Filippo Menczer, 2022. "Botometer 101: social bot practicum for computational social scientists," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1511-1528, November.
    4. Malik, Nishtha & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Tripathi, Shalini Nath & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Exploring the impact of fairness of social bots on user experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Zhang, Yaozeng & Ma, Jing & Fang, Fanshu, 2024. "How social bots can influence public opinion more effectively: Right connection strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
    6. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2022. "From the United States to China? A trade perspective to reveal the structure and dynamics of global electronic‐telecommunications," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 823-847, June.
    7. de Oliveira Maciel, Cristiano & Netto, Raul Zanon Rocha, 2020. "Architectural agency in intra-organizational networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 489-497.
    8. Starling David Hunter & Henrik Bentzen & Jan Taug, 2020. "On the “missing link” between formal organization and informal social structure," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Xia, Huosong & Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Zheng, Leven J. & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Arya, Varsha, 2023. "COVID-19 fake news detection: A hybrid CNN-BiLSTM-AM model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Vargas Meza Xanat & Ke Jiang & George A. Barnett & Han Woo Park, 2018. "International trade of GMO-related agricultural products," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 565-587, March.
    11. Nina Kolleck & Helge Jörgens & Mareike Well, 2017. "Levels of Governance in Policy Innovation Cycles in Community Education: The Cases of Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Tracy Ann Sykes, 2013. "Digital Divide Initiative Success in Developing Countries: A Longitudinal Field Study in a Village in India," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 239-260, June.
    13. Jing, Fei & Zhang, Zhong & Wu, Jian-Liang & Hu, Die & Zhang, Zi-Ke, 2025. "Quantifying and predicting evolutionary networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Bret A. Muter & Meredith L. Gore & Shawn J. Riley, 2013. "Social Contagion of Risk Perceptions in Environmental Management Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1489-1499, August.
    15. Hang Luo & Jianwei Tan, 2024. "The “Butterfly Effect” of Volatility in Net International Capital Flows: An Analysis of Co-Movement Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    16. James R. Barth & Sunghoon Joo & Kang‐Bok Lee, 2022. "Bank–client cross‐ownership of bank stocks: A network analysis," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 280-312, June.
    17. Charles J. Gomez & Andrew C. Herman & Paolo Parigi, 2022. "Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 919-929, July.
    18. PerOla Öberg & Torsten Svensson, 2010. "Does Power Drive Out Trust? Relations between Labour Market Actors in Sweden," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 143-166, February.
    19. Pallotti, Francesca & Lomi, Alessandro, 2011. "Network influence and organizational performance: The effects of tie strength and structural equivalence," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 389-403.
    20. Sharique Hasan & Rembrand Koning, 2020. "Designing social networks: joint tasks and the formation and endurance of network ties," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04472-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.