IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02553-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of traffic education and its examination system—an extended House of Quality approach

Author

Listed:
  • László Buics

    (Széchenyi István University)

  • Zsolt Csaba Horváth

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)

  • Péter Földesi

    (Széchenyi István University
    Hungarian Research Network, Piarista u. 4)

  • Boglárka Balassa Eisinger

    (Széchenyi István University)

Abstract

The goal of this article is to examine traffic education and its examination system, using a new approach based on the House of Quality method. While every country has its own legal rules and requirements regarding how traffic education and examinations are conducted, there is a direct relationship between traffic education, its examination system and road safety. Therefore the quality of such a complicated process is of great interest for both stakeholders: the authorities and the citizens. These stakeholders both have their own objectives regarding the system, consequently increasing its complexity. This article investigates, as its case study, the system in Hungary. The House of Quality method has been expanded to provide a unique approach to examine the goals and objectives of both stakeholders, revealing similarities and differences and their interrelationships. Secondary data on the effectiveness of the traffic education and examination system are also analysed. Based on the HOQ model representations of the goals and objectives of the stakeholders regarding the traffic education and exam system, it can be established that the stakeholder points of view are closer to each other in the case of the test system than that of the education system. However, there are unsolved contradictions between the stakeholders that have to be handled, as opinions regarding the quality of the service and the criteria of the stakeholders’ satisfaction are very diverse.

Suggested Citation

  • László Buics & Zsolt Csaba Horváth & Péter Földesi & Boglárka Balassa Eisinger, 2024. "An assessment of traffic education and its examination system—an extended House of Quality approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02553-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02553-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02553-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02553-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsung-Yu Chou, 2020. "Using FQFD and FGRA to Enhance the Advertising Effectiveness of Cross-Regional E-Commerce Platforms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Aleksander Aristovnik & Eva Murko & Dejan Ravšelj, 2022. "From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Ziyuan Tang & Hasan Dinçer, 2019. "Selecting the House-of-Quality-Based Energy Investment Policies for the Sustainable Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Majed Alinizzi & Husnain Haider & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Fawaz Alharbi & Saleh M. Alogla & Gamal A. Al-Saadi, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Construction Technologies for Large Pipelines on Urban Highways: Scenario Analysis using Fuzzy QFD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Pusp Raj Joshi & Shareeful Islam, 2018. "E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baseer Ahmad Baheer & David Lamas & Sónia Sousa, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Fengchang Jiang & John Awaitey & Haiyan Xie, 2022. "Analysis of Construction Cost and Investment Planning Using Time Series Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Titisari Ramadhane, 2023. "Development of Public Value Based E-Government Maturity Framework," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 16(1), pages 18-25.
    4. Sung-Bou Kim & Dongwook Kim, 2020. "ICT Implementation and Its Effect on Public Organizations: The Case of Digital Customs and Risk Management in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Palaco, Ileana & Park, Min Jae & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2019. "Public–private partnerships for e-government in developing countries: An early stage assessment framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 205-218.
    6. Luisa Fernanda Rodriguez-Hevía & Julio Navío-Marco & Luis Manuel Ruiz-Gómez, 2020. "Citizens’ Involvement in E-Government in the European Union: The Rising Importance of the Digital Skills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Jaromir Durkiewicz & Tomasz Janowski, 2021. "Is Digital Government Advancing Sustainable Governance? A Study of OECD/EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Pengran Zhou & Pengfei Zhou & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Gülsüm Sena Uluer, 2019. "Balanced Scorecard-Based Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Investment Projects with IT2 Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Zhou, Pengfei & Luo, Jie & Cheng, Fei & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of risk priorities for renewable energy investment projects using a hybrid IT2 hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with alpha cuts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Krzysztof Krukowski & Magdalena Raczyńska, 2019. "Attributes of Process Maturity of Public Administration Units in Poland," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Noushin Javidi & Younes Mohammadzadeh, 2022. "The effect of virtualization of organizational performance on organizational stability through the synergy of human capital and organizational wisdom organization in sports organizations," Technium Sustainability, Technium Science, vol. 2(1), pages 13-30, January.
    12. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Ahmad Althunibat & Muhammad Binsawad & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Omar Almomani & Adeeb Alsaaidah & Waleed Al-Rahmi & Mohamed Elhassan Seliaman, 2021. "Sustainable Applications of Smart-Government Services: A Model to Understand Smart-Government Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Mosleh Zeebaree & Mary Agoyi & Musbah Aqel, 2022. "Sustainable Adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Seunghwan Myeong & Michael J. Ahn & Younhee Kim & Shengli Chu & Woojong Suh, 2021. "Government Data Performance: The Roles of Technology, Government Capacity, and Globalization through the Effects of National Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Chao Zhou & Dongyu Liu & Pengfei Zhou & Jie Luo & Serhat Yuksel & Hasan Dincer, 2020. "Hybrid Predictive Decision-Making Approach to Emission Reduction Policies for Sustainable Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Joanna Ejdys, 2020. "Trust-Based Determinants of Future Intention to Use Technology," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 60-68.
    18. repec:thr:techub:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:13-30 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Susana Iglesias-Antelo & Vicente López-López & Antonio Vázquez-Sanmartín, 2021. "Assessing the Influence of Strategic Resources on the Quality of Life in Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02553-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.