IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v20y2018i1d10.1057_s41278-017-0072-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining multicriteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis in the assessment of maritime projects financed by the European Investment Bank

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Clintworth

    (European Investment Bank)

  • Evangelos Boulougouris

    (University of Strathclyde)

  • Byung Suk Lee

    (University of Strathclyde)

Abstract

As the financing institution of the EU, the European Investment Bank (EIB) has a long history of investments in the maritime sector. The EIB’s support for the sector is guided by EU maritime policy which is increasingly influenced by non-financial criteria such as safety, environment and employment. The increasing inclusion of non-financial criteria into financial decisions adds to the degree of subjectivity involved in project investment decisions, especially the ones involving public funds. This subjectivity is present in individual decision maker’s thought processes when assessing the relative importance of each criterion. Within this context, this paper examines a methodology which combines established financial analysis methods with multicriteria decision analysis in an effort to address this complex issue. The aim is to develop a model, which incorporates financial and non-financial criteria whilst accounting for the inherent subjectivity in investment decision making, in a transparent and auditable manner. The paper examines the application of the model to a fleet expansion project which has been financed by the EIB. Further research is proposed including ways in which the model could also be utilised as a performance indictor to track the degree to which EIB financing meets the goals outlined in EU maritime policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Clintworth & Evangelos Boulougouris & Byung Suk Lee, 2018. "Combining multicriteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis in the assessment of maritime projects financed by the European Investment Bank," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(1), pages 29-47, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-017-0072-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-017-0072-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-017-0072-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-017-0072-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong-Wook Song & Ki-Tae Yeo, 2004. "A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 34-52, March.
    2. Christoph H. Loch & Stylianos Kavadias, 2002. "Dynamic Portfolio Selection of NPD Programs Using Marginal Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1227-1241, October.
    3. Michael Spackman, 2004. "Time discounting and of the cost of capital in government," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 25(4), pages 467-518, December.
    4. T C Lirn & H A Thanopoulou & M J Beynon & A K C Beresford, 2004. "An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 70-91, March.
    5. Evangelos-Pavlos Rousos & Byung S. Lee, 2012. "Multicriteria analysis in shipping investment evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 423-442, July.
    6. Elvira Haezendonck, 2008. "Transport Project Evaluation: Extending the Social Cost Benefit Approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(3), pages 322-324, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor Perechuda, 2022. "Why Scientists Do Not Like EU Funding Policy? A Research Review on Performance Evaluation of EU Funding Activities," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 308-319.
    2. Ebeling Antoine, 2022. "European investment Bank loan appraisal, the EU climate bank ?," Working Papers of BETA 2022-10, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Majid Eskafi & Reza Fazeli & Ali Dastgheib & Poonam Taneja & Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson & Ragnheidur I. Thorarinsdottir & Gunnar Stefansson, 2020. "A value-based definition of success in adaptive port planning: a case study of the Port of Isafjordur in Iceland," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 403-431, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng-Hsien Hsieh, 2014. "Disaster risk assessment of ports based on the perspective of vulnerability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 851-864, November.
    2. Yuen, Chi-lok Andrew & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2012. "Port competitiveness from the users' perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-40.
    3. Steven, Adams B. & Corsi, Thomas M., 2012. "Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 881-895.
    4. Wanke, Peter & Falcão, Bernardo Bastos, 2017. "Cargo allocation in Brazilian ports: An analysis through fuzzy logic and social networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 33-46.
    5. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Sang-Yoon Lee & Hyunwoo Lim & Hwa-Joong Kim, 2017. "Forecasting container port volume: implications for dredging," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 296-314, June.
    7. M. A. Mueller & B. Wiegmans & J. H. R. Duin, 2020. "The geography of container port choice: modelling the impact of hinterland changes on port choice," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 26-52, March.
    8. Balci, Gökcay & Cetin, Ismail Bilge & Esmer, Soner, 2018. "An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 294-304.
    9. Lee, Choong Bae & Wan, Junbin & Shi, Wenming & Li, Kevin, 2014. "A cross-country study of competitiveness of the shipping industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 366-376.
    10. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    11. Simme Veldman & Eric van Drunen, 2011. "Measuring Competition between Ports," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    13. Adolf K.Y. Ng & Zaili Yang & Stephen Cahoon & Paul T.W. Lee & Dago Alain Gohomene & Zaili l. Yang & Stephen Bonsal & Eleftherios Maistralis & Jin Wang & Kevin X. Li, 2016. "The Attractiveness of Ports in West Africa: Some Lessons from Shipping Lines' Port Selection," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 416-426, September.
    14. Kroon, Rutger & Vis, Iris F.A., 2005. "Seriously Ceres ?," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    15. Pierre Cariou & Ali Cheaitou & Olivier Faury & Sadeque Hamdan, 2021. "The feasibility of Arctic container shipping: the economic and environmental impacts of ice thickness," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 615-631, December.
    16. Tavasszy, Lóránt & Minderhoud, Michiel & Perrin, Jean-François & Notteboom, Theo, 2011. "A strategic network choice model for global container flows: specification, estimation and application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1163-1172.
    17. Theocharis, Dimitrios & Pettit, Stephen & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Haider, Jane, 2018. "Arctic shipping: A systematic literature review of comparative studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-128.
    18. Bahana Wiradanti & Stephen Pettit & Andrew Potter & Wessam Abouarghoub, 2020. "Willingness to invest in peripheral ports: perceptions of Indonesian port and maritime industry stakeholders," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 699-714, December.
    19. Theo E Notteboom, 2009. "Complementarity and Substitutability among Adjacent Gateway Ports," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(3), pages 743-762, March.
    20. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Jing Dai, 2012. "A decision support system for port selection," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 509-524, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-017-0072-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.