IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jobman/v27y2020i5d10.1057_s41262-020-00201-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

My brand identity lies in the brand name: personified suggestive brand names

Author

Listed:
  • Selcan Kara

    (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth)

  • Kunter Gunasti

    (Carson College of Business, Washington State University)

  • William T. Ross

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

This research introduces personified suggestive brand names, the degree to which a brand name (1) defines a potential user of the brand or (2) portrays personal characteristics that are used by the consumer to anthropomorphize the brand. Results of four experiments show that consumers are more likely to form brand relationships and more favorable brand evaluations toward more (e.g., Smart), compared to less (e.g., Technical), personified suggestive brand names, because (1) they form a self-brand name connection with these brand names to present themselves to others and (2) they humanize the brand via these brand names. Additionally, personified suggestive brand names lead to self-brand name connections that result in brand anthropomorphism, which leads to favorable branding outcomes, particularly among Relational Interdependent Self-construal consumers, who are more likely to incorporate their relationships on their self-definitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Selcan Kara & Kunter Gunasti & William T. Ross, 2020. "My brand identity lies in the brand name: personified suggestive brand names," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 607-621, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jobman:v:27:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1057_s41262-020-00201-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41262-020-00201-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41262-020-00201-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41262-020-00201-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    2. Noel Albert & Dwight Merunka, 2013. "The role of brand love in consumer‐brand relationships," Post-Print hal-01822309, HAL.
    3. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    4. Kohli, Chiranjeev S. & Harich, Katrin R. & Leuthesser, Lance, 2005. "Creating brand identity: a study of evaluation of new brand names," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1506-1515, November.
    5. Timucin Ozcan & Kunter Gunasti, 2019. "How associations between products and numbers in brand names affect consumer attitudes: introducing multi-context numbers," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 176-194, March.
    6. Huber, Frank & Vollhardt, Kai & Matthes, Isabel & Vogel, Johannes, 2010. "Brand misconduct: Consequences on consumer-brand relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1113-1120, November.
    7. Jennifer Edson Escalas & James R. Bettman, 2005. "Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 378-389, December.
    8. Véronique Pauwels-Delassus & Raluca Mogos Descotes, 2013. "Brand name change: Can trust and loyalty be transferred?," Post-Print hal-01369461, HAL.
    9. Jenniina Sihvonen, 2019. "Understanding the drivers of consumer–brand identification," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 583-594, September.
    10. Pankaj Aggarwal & Ann L. McGill, 2007. "Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 468-479, June.
    11. Vanitha Swaminathan & Karen M. Stilley & Rohini Ahluwalia, 2009. "When Brand Personality Matters: The Moderating Role of Attachment Styles," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 985-1002, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaun M. Powell, 2020. "Journal of Brand Management: year end review 2020," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 623-628, November.
    2. Nhlabathi Mthobisi & Mgiba Freddy Marilahimbilu & Ligaraba Neo, 2022. "Social Media Marketing Attributes, Sandton’s Rental Market Brand Image, and the Millennials’ Rental Preference: An Empirical Study," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 34-52, March.
    3. Xiongkai Tan & Sha Zhang & Hong Zhao, 2023. "Does the impact of corporate brand name changes differ between online and offline channels? The case of McDonald’s China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(6), pages 479-489, November.
    4. Marion Garaus & Christian Garaus & Elisabeth Wolfsteiner & Charlotte Jermendy, 2022. "Anthropomorphism as a Differentiation Strategy for Standardized Reusable Glass Containers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selcan Kara & Kunter Gunasti & William T. Ross, 0. "My brand identity lies in the brand name: personified suggestive brand names," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    2. Anwar Sadat Shimul, 2022. "Brand attachment: a review and future research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 400-419, July.
    3. Alabed, Amani & Javornik, Ana & Gregory-Smith, Diana, 2022. "AI anthropomorphism and its effect on users' self-congruence and self–AI integration: A theoretical framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Bernritter, Stefan F. & Verlegh, Peeter W.J. & Smit, Edith G., 2016. "Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 27-42.
    5. Tiphaine Gorlier & Géraldine Michel, 2020. "How special rewards in loyalty programs enrich consumer–brand relationships: The role of self‐expansion," Post-Print hal-02494605, HAL.
    6. Viktoria Maria Radler, 2018. "20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 370-383, July.
    7. Karanika, Katerina & Hogg, Margaret K., 2020. "Self–object relationships in consumers’ spontaneous metaphors of anthropomorphism, zoomorphism, and dehumanization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 15-25.
    8. Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2022. "“All you need is love”. From product design value perception to luxury brand love: An integrated framework," Post-Print hal-03562015, HAL.
    9. Sehrash Siddique & Amer Rajput, 2022. "Self-expressiveness and hedonic brand affect brand love through brand jealousy," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Hollenbeck, Candice R. & Kaikati, Andrew M., 2012. "Consumers' use of brands to reflect their actual and ideal selves on Facebook," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 395-405.
    11. Ahmad Daryanto & Nicholas Alexander & Gilang Kartika, 2022. "The anthropomorphic brand logo and its effect on perceived functional performance," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 287-300, May.
    12. Vesna Babić-Hodović & Alisa Mujkić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić, 2023. "We need both brand love and emotional attachment: a serial mediation framework toward addictive buying and loyalty," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(1), pages 9-33, January.
    13. Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurélie & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2022. "“All you need is love” from product design value perception to luxury brand love: An integrated framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1463-1475.
    14. Eunkyung Lee & Yeosun Yoon, 2022. "Heading Up or Stuck Down Here? The Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility on Subjective Social Status and Brand Identification," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    15. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    16. Amélie Guèvremont & Bianca Grohmann, 2018. "Does brand authenticity alleviate the effect of brand scandals?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 322-336, July.
    17. Golossenko, Artyom & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Aroean, Lukman, 2020. "Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 737-755.
    18. Tsuen-Ho Hsu & Ling-Zhong Lin, 2021. "A Multidimensional Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment Design for Brand Experience Assessment of Convenience Stores," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    20. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jobman:v:27:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1057_s41262-020-00201-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.