IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Mutual obligation, unemployment and wellbeing

Listed author(s):
  • Peter Saunders


    (University of New South Wales)

Registered author(s):

    Recent reforms to the Australian system of income support for the unemployed have been designed to encourage the welfare to work transition. Mutual obligation measures have been accompanied by an easing of the income test taper rate and by less generous indexation arrangements for unemployment benefit levels than for most other payments. These changes have made passive receipt of unemployment benefit less attractive and less feasible for those who are unemployed. At the same time, the labour market has been growing strongly and the unemployment rate has reached its lowest level for three decades, so that the prospects of finding a job if unemployed have greatly improved. This paper uses data from two comparable social surveys to examine whether the impact of unemployment on the well-being of those in the labour force changed between 1999 and 2006. The results indicate that being unemployed is associated with lower levels of well-being on all available indicators in both years, with the effects statistically stronger in the later year. However, the evidence is mixed on whether the size of the well-being penalty associated with being unemployed increased over the period. There is no clear evidence that the penalty was greater in the later year, although this may reflect changes in the composition of the unemployed and/or the role of omitted factors.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School in its journal Australian Journal of Labour Economics.

    Volume (Year): 10 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 167-184

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:10:y:2007:i:3:p:167-184
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:10:y:2007:i:3:p:167-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alan Duncan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.