IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v20y1998i1p186-201..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Incidence of Producer Welfare Losses from Food Safety Regulation in the Meat Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Laurian J. Unnevehr
  • Miguel I. Gómez
  • Philip Garcia

Abstract

The article examines how new regulations to reduce microbial pathogens may influence competitiveness among beef, pork, and poultry. A multimarket model is used to simulate the effects of increased costs on producer welfare losses, taking into account cost differences among meats and substitutions in consumption. Producer losses will be higher for meat products with more processing plants, larger own-price elasticities, and substitution effects that work against them. For example, poultry's estimated losses are the lowest, due to a relatively small number of plants, small own-price effects, and substitutions into poultry with the increased relative prices of other meats.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurian J. Unnevehr & Miguel I. Gómez & Philip Garcia, 1998. "The Incidence of Producer Welfare Losses from Food Safety Regulation in the Meat Industry," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 186-201.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:20:y:1998:i:1:p:186-201.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349542
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiptsova, Rimma & Thomsen, Michael R. & Goodwin, Harold L., Jr., 2002. "Producer Welfare Changes From Meat And Poultry Recalls," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 33(2), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Zhigang Wang & Huina Yuan & Fred Gale, 2009. "Costs of Adopting a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point System: Case Study of a Chinese Poultry Processing Firm," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 574-588.
    3. Roland Herrmann & Gerhard Scherhorn & Stefan Tangermann & Christoph Weiss & Martin Wille, 2001. "Will more regulations achieve better consumer protection?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(06), pages 3-18, September.
    4. Ragona, Maddalena & Mazzocchi, Mario, 2008. "Impact Evaluation of Food Safety Regulations: A Review of Quantitative Methods," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49887, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Rude, James & Meilke, Karl D., 2004. "Developing Policy Relevant Agrifood Models," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(2), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Martinez, Stephen W. & Zering, Kelly D., 2004. "Pork Quality And The Role Of Market Organizaton," Agricultural Economic Reports 33973, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Ragona, Maddalena & Mazzocchi, Mario, 2008. "Measuring the Impacts of Food Safety Regulations: A Methodological Review," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43864, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Lusk, Jayson L. & Anderson, John D., 2003. "Modeling The Effects Of Country Of Origin Labeling On Meat Producers And Consumers," Staff Papers 28660, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    9. Giovannucci, Daniele & Reardon, Thomas, 2000. "Understanding Grades and Standards: and how to apply them," MPRA Paper 13549, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:20:y:1998:i:1:p:186-201.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.