Should the US increase subsidies to R&D? Lessons from an endogenous growth theory
In this article we devise an endogenous growth model with R&D, physical capital, and human capital with several externalities. The model is calibrated to the US economy and used to quantitatively evaluate the effect on growth and welfare of implementing different budget-neutral policies. The welfare effects of different policies are calculated by taking into account the transitional dynamics of the economy after the policy reform. Our main findings have policy implications; mainly, subsidies to research are the most welfare-increasing amongst the budget-neutral policies, and the optimal structure of subsidies entails substantially increasing the subsidy to R&D, maintaining a zero subsidy to production, and reducing the subsidy to education, so as to keep the intertemporal government budget balanced. A detailed sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of these results. Copyright 2014 Oxford University Press 2013 All rights reserved, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 66 (2014)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 254-282
| Handle: | RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:66:y:2014:i:1:p:254-282 |
| Contact details of provider: | Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK Fax: 01865 267 985 Web page: http://oep.oupjournals.org/ Email:
|
| Order Information: | Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals |
No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:66:y:2014:i:1:p:254-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)
or (Christopher F. Baum)If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.