IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v38y1986i2p342-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A General Equilibrium Model of Multinational Corporations in Developing Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Batra, Raveendra N

Abstract

The standard approach to mea suring earnings differentials is extended to include a female participation deci sion, and the effectsof sample selection are analyzed. A substantial proportion of the earnings differential between men and women in the U.K. graduate labor m arket can be attributed to residual factors rather than attributes and character istics. Womens' earnings could be as much as18 percent higher if these factors were removed. A statistically significant sample selection effect is present, bu t its quantitativeimpact on the measures of the residual differential is variab le. Thedata are sufficiently comprehensive to justify wider academic interest. Copyright 1986 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Batra, Raveendra N, 1986. "A General Equilibrium Model of Multinational Corporations in Developing Economies," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 342-353, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:38:y:1986:i:2:p:342-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28198607%292%3A38%3A2%3C342%3AAGEMOM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beladi, Hamid & Kwan Choi, E., 1995. "On the emergence of multinational corporations in developing economies: A note," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 675-684, October.
    2. Saibal Kar & Mausumi Kar, 2015. "Liberalized trade policy and inequality: Evidence from Post-Multi-Fibre Arrangement India and some theoretical issues," WIDER Working Paper Series 007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Reis, Ana Balcao, 2006. "Welfare, taxes and foreign investment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1045-1061, June.
    4. Chi‐Chur Chao & Eden S. H. Yu, 1997. "International Capital Competition and Environmental Standards," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 531-541, October.
    5. Peter Nunnenkamp & Maximiliano Sosa Andrés, 2014. "Ownership Choices of Indian Direct Investors: Do FDI Determinants Differ between Joint Ventures and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries?," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 3(1), pages 39-78, June.
    6. Chao, Chi-Chur & Yu, Eden S. H., 1998. "Export-share requirements, trade balances and welfare: a two-period analysis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 217-228, June.
    7. Mausumi Kar & Saibal Kar, 2015. "Liberalized trade policy and inequality: Evidence from Post-Multi-Fibre Arrangement India and some theoretical issues," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Saibal Kar & Chaitali Sinha, 2014. "Sectoral Technical Progress and Aggregate Skill Formation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 159-172, June.
    9. Andrzej Cieślik, 2008. "Wpływ przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych na fragmentaryzację produkcji i handel wewnątrzgałęziowy Polski z krajami OECD," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 10, pages 1-21.
    10. Andrzej Cieślik, 2005. "Wpływ przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych na rynek pracy w kraju goszczącym," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 17-35.
    11. Mausumi Kar & Saibal Kar, 2017. "Multi Fibre Arrangement and Wage Inequality: Firm and State-level Evidence from India and a Theoretical Model," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1473-1493, July.
    12. Sugata Marjit & Manoj Pant & Sugandha Huria, 2020. "Unskilled immigration, technical progress, and wages—Role of the household sector," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 235-251, February.
    13. Abera Gelan, 2004. "The Effects Of Multinational Enterprises Investment In The Nontraded Sector Of Developing Economies," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 41-64, December.
    14. Andrzej Cieślik, 2008. "Multinational Firms, International Knowledge Flows, and Dual Labor Markets in Developing Economies," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 160-179, February.
    15. Yu, Eden S. H. & Chi-Chur, Chao, 1996. "Are wholly foreign-owned enterprises better than joint ventures?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 225-237, February.
    16. Edward John Ray, 1989. "The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, 1979-85," NBER Chapters, in: Trade Policies for International Competitiveness, pages 53-84, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Beladi, Hamid & Chau, Nancy H. & Ali Khan, M., 2000. "North-South Investment Flows and Optimal Environmental Policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 275-296, November.
    18. Sugata Marjit & Hamid Beladi, 2001. "South-South Cooperation and Export," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 283-293, May.
    19. Sugandha Huria & Manoj Pant, 2018. "Foreign direct investment, welfare and wage inequality in a small open economy: theory and empirics," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 131-166, December.
    20. Chao, Chi-Chur & Yu, Eden S. H., 2003. "Export-performance requirements, foreign investment quotas, and welfare in a small dynamic economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 387-400, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:38:y:1986:i:2:p:342-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.