IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v41y2025i3p930-958..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Noncompete agreements in a rigid labor market: the case of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Tito Boeri
  • Andrea Garnero
  • Lorenzo G Luisetto

Abstract

Noncompete agreements limiting the mobility of workers have been found to be widespread in the United States, a flexible and lightly regulated labor market. We explore the use of noncompete agreements in a rigid and highly regulated labor market, where labor mobility is low, and the labor market is highly regulated via legislation and collective bargaining. Based on a novel survey of Italian workers and an analysis of the regulatory framework, our study shows how trends and patterns in the use of noncompete agreements are not specific to a flexible labor market. Even in a rigid and highly regulated labor market, noncompete agreements are widespread, and often do not comply with the minimum legal requirements, and yet workers are not aware of their enforceability. This suggests that institutions and labor market regulations are not enough per se, especially when targeted groups are not properly informed, and incentives to comply are minimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Tito Boeri & Andrea Garnero & Lorenzo G Luisetto, 2025. "Noncompete agreements in a rigid labor market: the case of Italy," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 930-958.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:930-958.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewae012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:930-958.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.