IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Employee layoff under different modes of restructuring: exit, downsizing or relocation

  • Kristien Coucke
  • Enrico Pennings
  • Leo Sleuwaegen

Pressured by globalizing economies and growing international competition, an increasing number of firms are forced to rationalize productive operations. Especially poorly performing firms need to improve their profitability through downsizing or relocating their operations, which in many cases causes collective employee layoffs. This article adds to the emergent literature on the consequences of downsizing by looking into the determinants of collective employee layoffs. Based on a unique sample of Belgian firms reporting collective layoffs this article analyzes the firm's decision to dismiss all employees (exit), a significant proportion of its employees without creating new employment elsewhere (downsizing), or to move production abroad (international relocation). We theoretically derive the conditions under which a firm prefers one strategy to another. The empirical results confirm that relocating firms are most profitable among the restructuring firms, have invested more in the recent past, operate in sectors with significant economies of scale and belong more often to a multinational group than firms opting for downsizing or exit. Downsizing firms are more capital intensive than relocating firms, while exiting firms are less profitable, smaller, younger, and more labor intensive than downsizing or relocating firms. Copyright 2007 , Oxford University Press.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Industrial and Corporate Change.

Volume (Year): 16 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
Pages: 161-182

in new window

Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:161-182
Contact details of provider: Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:161-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

or (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.