IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v70y2015i2p233-244..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive Effect of Social Work—Related Values on Work Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Age and Work Situation

Author

Listed:
  • Dannii Y. Yeung
  • Helene H. Fung
  • Darius K.-S. Chan

Abstract

Objectives. This study investigated the effect of social work—related values on job performance through job satisfaction and tested whether age and work situation would moderate such associations. Methods. This study consists of two parts: Part 1 is a cross-sectional survey among 299 Chinese clerical employees aged 19–60 years and Part 2 is a 14-day experience sampling study in a subsample of Part 1 (N = 67). Results and Discussion. Part 1 revealed that age moderated the effect of social work—related values on job performance through job satisfaction, with a stronger positive effect in older workers than in younger workers. Part 2 demonstrated that the moderating effect of age shown in Part 1 also varied across work situations. In particular, holding momentary social work—related values was beneficial to the task performance of older workers, and the effect was significantly stronger when they were in social situations than in nonsocial situations, whereas the effect remained weak among younger workers regardless of work context. Moreover, the moderating effect of age could be accounted for by future time perspective. This study supports socioemotional selectivity theory that goal orientation shifts toward the emphasis of interpersonal closeness when one perceives future time as increasingly limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Dannii Y. Yeung & Helene H. Fung & Darius K.-S. Chan, 2015. "Positive Effect of Social Work—Related Values on Work Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Age and Work Situation," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(2), pages 233-244.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:2:p:233-244.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbt094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne C. Bal & Abigail E. B. Reiss & Cort W. Rudolph & Boris B. Baltes, 2011. "Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 687-698.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yeung, Dannii Y. & Ho, Alvin K.K. & Lam, Alfred H.K. & Lam, Alvin C.H., 2023. "An integrated model on purchase intentions of typical and tax-deductible saving products: The roles of retirement goal clarity and age," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannes Zacher & Cort W. Rudolph, 2023. "The Construction of the “Older Worker”," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Patricia Carral & Carlos-María Alcover, 2019. "Measuring Age Discrimination at Work: Spanish Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Nordic Age Discrimination Scale (NADS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Anne Cornelia Kroon & Damian Trilling & Martine Selm & Rens Vliegenthart, 2019. "Biased media? How news content influences age discrimination claims," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 109-119, March.
    4. Arjan Heyma & Siemen Werff & Aukje Nauta & Guurtje Sloten, 2014. "What Makes Older Job-Seekers Attractive to Employers?," De Economist, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 397-414, December.
    5. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, K., 2017. "Do Stereotypes about Older Workers Change? : Evidence from a Panel Study among Employers," Discussion Paper 2017-028, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Hendrik P. van Dalen & Kène Henkens, 2019. "Do stereotypes about older workers change? A panel study on changing attitudes of managers," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(5), pages 535-550, December.
    7. Justyna Stypinska & Konrad Turek, 2017. "Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 49-61, March.
    8. Hui-Chuan Hsu, 2018. "Age Differences in Work Stress, Exhaustion, Well-Being, and Related Factors From an Ecological Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:2:p:233-244.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.