IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i667p999-1020..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptance of Inequality Between Children: Large-Scale Experimental Evidence from China and Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander W Cappelen
  • Ranveig Falch
  • Zhongjing Huang
  • Bertil Tungodden

Abstract

In a novel large-scale experiment, we study how adults in two societies, Shanghai (China) and Norway, make real distributive decisions involving children. We find that acceptance of inequality between children increases with the ages of the children, is affected by the source of inequality and the cost of redistribution, and is lower than acceptance of inequality between adults. We document a large cross-societal difference in inequality acceptance: adults in Shanghai implement twice as much inequality between children compared with adults in Norway. Finally, we show that the willingness to accept inequality between children is predictive of attitudes to child policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander W Cappelen & Ranveig Falch & Zhongjing Huang & Bertil Tungodden, 2025. "Acceptance of Inequality Between Children: Large-Scale Experimental Evidence from China and Norway," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(667), pages 999-1020.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:667:p:999-1020.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:667:p:999-1020.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.