IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v13y1989i1p79-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Rigidities and Economic Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Hodgson, Geoff

Abstract

This paper involves a critical discussion of Nicholas Kaldor's contribution to the theory of economic growth, and the associated Verdoorn Law. As well as Kaldor's theory, prominent rival theories, such as the diffusion hypothesis of S. Gomulka and the neo-Marxist model proposed by S. Bowles et al., are found wanting. An alternative approach is developed based on the nature and role of institutions in modern economies, and their function in encapsulating or transmitting both codifiable and noncodifiable knowledge. Confirmation of this "institutional" theory of economic growth is provided by an econometric test using cross-section OECD data. Copyright 1989 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Hodgson, Geoff, 1989. "Institutional Rigidities and Economic Growth," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 79-101, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:13:y:1989:i:1:p:79-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Hodgson, 2006. "Some Claims Made for Critical Realism in Economics: Two Case Studies," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 7.
    2. Brunk, Gregory G. & Hunter, Kennith G., 2008. "An ecological perspective on interest groups and economic stagnation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 194-212, February.
    3. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    4. Jeremy Howells, 2011. "Innovation and Globalisation: A Systems of Innovation Perspective," Chapters, in: Jonathan Michie (ed.), The Handbook of Globalisation, Second Edition, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Kobos, Peter H. & Erickson, Jon D. & Drennen, Thomas E., 2006. "Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(13), pages 1645-1658, September.
    6. Ndzembanteh Aboubakary Nulambeh & Kadir Yasin Eryiğit, 2022. "Exploring the energy-environment growth nexus in francophone Africa in presence of institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10069-10087, August.
    7. Xiong, Ailun & Xia, Senmao & Ye, Zhen Peter & Cao, Dongmei & Jing, Yanguo & Li, Hongyi, 2020. "Can innovation really bring economic growth? The role of social filter in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 50-61.
    8. Olsson, Ola, 2000. "A Microeconomic Analysis of Institutions," Working Papers in Economics 25, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    9. Fernando Collantes, 2009. "Rural Europe reshaped: the economic transformation of upland regions, 1850–20001," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(2), pages 306-323, May.
    10. Lars Carlsson, 2000. "Towards a sustainable Russian forest sector," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 24(1), pages 31-37, February.
    11. Nicholas Apergis & Spyros Zikos, 2003. "The Law of Verdoorn: Evidence from Greek Disaggregated Manufacturing Time Series Data," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 34(1), pages 87-104.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:13:y:1989:i:1:p:79-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.