IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i1p90-96..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experience modulates an insect’s response to anthropogenic noise

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Gallego-Abenza
  • Nicolas Mathevon
  • David Wheatcroft
  • Ulrika Candolin

Abstract

In response to anthropogenic noise, vertebrates express modified acoustic communication signals either through individual plasticity or local population adaptation. In contrast, how insects respond to this stressor is poorly studied. Field crickets Gryllus bimaculatus use acoustic signals to attract and locate mates and are commonly found in noisy roadside environments, offering a powerful system to study the effects of anthropogenic noise on insect communication. Rapid repetition of sexual calls (chirps) is essential to attract females, but calling incurs energetic costs and attracts predators. As a result, males are predicted to reduce calling rates when background noise is high. Here, we combine observations and experimental playbacks to show that the responses of field cricket males to anthropogenic noise also depend on their previous experience with passing cars. First, we show that males living on highway edges decrease their chirp rate in response to passing cars. To assess whether this behavioral response depends on previous exposure to car noise, we then broadcast recordings of car noise to males located at different distances from the road and, therefore, with different previous exposure to car noise. Although all tested individuals responded to broadcasted traffic noise, males closest to the road decreased their chirp rate less than individuals calling further from the road. These results suggest that regular exposure to anthropogenic noise may decrease individuals’ sensitivity and behavioral responses to noise, allowing them to maintain effective signaling rates. Behavioral plasticity modulated by experience may thus allow some insect species to cope with human-induced environmental stressors. Lay Summary Field crickets modulate their acoustic signals based on their degree of previous experience with traffic noise, which may help them avoid its interfering effects. These results help us understand how insects living in urban areas accommodate novel abiotic factors, in particular, traffic noise created by humans.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Gallego-Abenza & Nicolas Mathevon & David Wheatcroft & Ulrika Candolin, 2020. "Experience modulates an insect’s response to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 90-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:90-96.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz159
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert S. Feng & Peter M. Narins & Chun-He Xu & Wen-Yu Lin & Zu-Lin Yu & Qiang Qiu & Zhi-Min Xu & Jun-Xian Shen, 2006. "Ultrasonic communication in frogs," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7082), pages 333-336, March.
    2. Baty, Florent & Ritz, Christian & Charles, Sandrine & Brutsche, Martin & Flandrois, Jean-Pierre & Delignette-Muller, Marie-Laure, 2015. "A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(i05).
    3. Hans Slabbekoorn & Margriet Peet, 2003. "Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6946), pages 267-267, July.
    4. Mario Díaz & Antonio Parra & Clemente Gallardo, 2011. "Serins respond to anthropogenic noise by increasing vocal activity," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 332-336.
    5. Henrik Brumm & Mark Bee, 2016. "A meta-analytic castle built on sand? A comment on Roca et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1277-1278.
    6. Dominique A. Potvin & Raoul A. Mulder, 2013. "Immediate, independent adjustment of call pitch and amplitude in response to varying background noise by silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1363-1368.
    7. David N. Fisher & Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz & Tom Tregenza, 2016. "Comparing pre- and post-copulatory mate competition using social network analysis in wild crickets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(3), pages 912-919.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swaroop Patankar & Ravi Jambhekar & Kulbhushansingh Ramesh Suryawanshi & Harini Nagendra, 2021. "Which Traits Influence Bird Survival in the City? A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Luca Micoli & Giuseppe Di Rauso Simeone & Maria Turco & Giuseppe Toscano & Maria A. Rao, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Olive Mill Wastewater in the Presence of Biochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    3. S. Mahmuda & T. Sigler & E. Knight & J. Corcoran, 2020. "Sectoral evolution and shifting service delivery models in the sharing economy," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 663-684, July.
    4. Tom Tregenza & Petri T Niemelä & Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz & Paul E Hopwood, 2022. "Environment and mate attractiveness in a wild insect [Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(5), pages 999-1006.
    5. Ramirez-Carrasco, C. & Córdova-Lepe, F. & Moreno-Gómez, F.N. & Velásquez, N.A., 2022. "A mathematical model for the impact of noise on population dynamics of a single species experiencing Lombard effect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    6. Mieke C. Zwart & Jonathon C. Dunn & Philip J.K. McGowan & Mark J. Whittingham, 2016. "Wind farm noise suppresses territorial defense behavior in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 101-108.
    7. Aysan Badraghi & Beáta Novotná & Jan Frouz & Koloman Krištof & Martin Trakovický & Martin Juriga & Branislav Chvila & Leonardo Montagnani, 2023. "Temporal Dynamics of CO 2 Fluxes over a Non-Irrigated Vineyard," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Ikkyu Aihara & Emyo Fujioka & Shizuko Hiryu, 2013. "Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of the Echolocation Strategies of Bats on the Basis of Mathematical Modelling and Laboratory Experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-8, July.
    9. Bani-Yaghoub, Majid & Reed, Aaron, 2018. "A methodology to quantify the long-term changes in social networks of competing species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 147-157.
    10. Teff-Seker, Y. & Berger-Tal, O. & Lehnardt, Y. & Teschner, N., 2022. "Noise pollution from wind turbines and its effects on wildlife: A cross-national analysis of current policies and planning regulations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Taufan Alam & Priyono Suryanto & Nanang Susyanto & Budiastuti Kurniasih & Panjisakti Basunanda & Eka Tarwaca Susila Putra & Dody Kastono & Dyah Weny Respatie & Muhammad Habib Widyawan & Nurmansyah & A, 2022. "Performance of 45 Non-Linear Models for Determining Critical Period of Weed Control and Acceptable Yield Loss in Soybean Agroforestry Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Hirche, Martin & Greenacre, Luke & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Loose, Simone & Lockshin, Larry, 2021. "SKU performance and distribution: A large-scale analysis of the role of product characteristics with store scanner data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Divino, Jose Angelo & Maciel, Daniel T.G.N. & Sosa, Wilfredo, 2020. "Government size, composition of public spending and economic growth in Brazil," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 155-166.
    14. Diana Carolina Rodríguez-Abello & Jorge Augusto Navarro-Alberto & Luis Ramírez-Avilés & Roberto Zamora-Bustillos, 2018. "The effect of sowing time on the growth of chia (Salvia hispanica L.): What do nonlinear mixed models tell us about it?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Mathilde, Godefroid & Tom, Zeimes & Lorenzo, Bramanti & Pascal, Romans & Marzia, Bo & Margherita, Toma & Bruno, Danis & Philippe, Dubois & Charlène, Guillaumot, 2023. "Low vulnerability of the Mediterranean antipatharian Antipathella subpinnata (Ellis & Solander, 1786) to ocean warming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    16. Justin D. Gay & Bryce Currey & E. N. J. Brookshire, 2022. "Global distribution and climate sensitivity of the tropical montane forest nitrogen cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    17. Zhiqiang Wang & Heng Huang & Han Wang & Josep Peñuelas & Jordi Sardans & Ülo Niinemets & Karl J. Niklas & Yan Li & Jiangbo Xie & Ian J. Wright, 2022. "Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Yani Bao & Wai Ling Lee & Jie Jia, 2018. "Exergy Analyses and Modelling of a Novel Extra-Low Temperature Dedicated Outdoor Air System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Hirche, Martin & Farris, Paul W. & Greenacre, Luke & Quan, Yiran & Wei, Susan, 2021. "Predicting Under- and Overperforming SKUs within the Distribution–Market Share Relationship," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 697-714.
    20. Giulio Arcangeli & Lucrezia Ginevra Lulli & Veronica Traversini & Simone De Sio & Emanuele Cannizzaro & Raymond Paul Galea & Nicola Mucci, 2022. "Neurobehavioral Alterations from Noise Exposure in Animals: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:90-96.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.