IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v96y2014i3p924-938..html

Differential Export Taxes along the Oilseeds Value Chain: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Bouët
  • Carmen Estrades
  • David Laborde

Abstract

Differential Export Tax (DET) rates, or the policy of imposing high export taxes on raw commodities and low export taxes on processed goods, generate public revenues and promote production at the more processed stages of a value chain. We study the theoretical justification of this trade policy by designing a simple international trade model which shows that a tax on exports of a raw agricultural commodity in a country that exports seeds and vegetable oils increases the sum of final consumers' surplus, processing sector profits, farmers' surplus, and public revenues. We then develop a partial equilibrium model of the world's oilseed value chain and simulate the total elimination of DETs in Argentina and Indonesia, as well as the independent removal of export taxes at various stages of production in the same countries. Estimations show that removing export taxes along the entire value chain in Argentina and Indonesia reduces the local production of biofuels by only 0.4% in Argentina, while eliminating only the export tax on biofuels in Argentina leads to a 9.6% volume increase in Argentinean biofuels production.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Bouët & Carmen Estrades & David Laborde, 2014. "Differential Export Taxes along the Oilseeds Value Chain: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(3), pages 924-938.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:96:y:2014:i:3:p:924-938.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aau011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2021. "Investigating Alternative Poultry Trade Policies in the Context of African Countries: Evidence from Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315173, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Solleder, Jean-Marc, 2020. "Market power and export taxes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. van Tol, M.C.M. & Moncada, J.A. & Lukszo, Z. & Weijnen, M., 2021. "Modelling the interaction between policies and international trade flows for liquid biofuels: an agent-based modelling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Lee, Siu Ming & Adam, Radziah & Tuan Lonik, Ku’ Azam, 2020. "The Effects of Tax and Promotion on Rubber Medical Devices Export," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 54(2), pages 29-40.
    5. Gohin, Alexandre & Levert, Fabrice & Forslund, Agneta, . "The EU Argentinean Trade Dispute on Biodiesel: An Economic Assessment," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(01).
    6. Estrades, Carmen & Flores, Manuel & Lezama, Guillermo, "undated". "The Role of Export Restrictions in Agricultural Trade," Commissioned Papers 256421, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. Jiarong Qian & Shoichi Ito & Zhijun Zhao, 2020. "The effect of price support policies on food security and farmers’ income in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1328-1349, October.
    8. Olga Solleder, 2013. "Panel Export Taxes (PET) Dataset: New Data on Export Tax Rates," IHEID Working Papers 07-2013, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    9. Anania, Giovanni, 2013. "Agricultural Export Restrictions and the WTO: What Options Do Policy-Makers Have For Promoting Food Security?," Price Volatility and Beyond 320191, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    10. Ostashko, Tamara & Kobuta, Iryna & Olefir, Volodymyr & Lienivova, Hanna, . "Evaluation of the results and analysis of the impact of the DCFTA with the EU on agricultural trade in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4).
    11. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2020. "Tariff Escalation and Import Bans in the Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and West Africa," Conference papers 333239, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Badri Narayanan, G. & Khorana, Sangeetha, 2014. "Tariff escalation, export shares and economy-wide welfare: A computable general equilibrium approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 109-118.
    13. Wittern, Jonas & Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald, 2023. "Cashew processing in Ghana – A case for infant industry support?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Tchoffo, Rodrigue, 2021. "Design of a Covid-19 model for environmental impact: From the partial equilibrium to the Computable General Equilibrium model," MPRA Paper 108920, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 Jul 2021.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:96:y:2014:i:3:p:924-938.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.