IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2017i2p210-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Of Government Spending On Income Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Renata MADZINOVA

    (Department of Economics Management and Marketing, College of International Business)

Abstract

Fiscal policy is an essential tool of government to influence the operation of the economy in the country. Despite the fact that each country faces a number of challenges that are specific just for the country, they also have common objectives. One of these is the redistribution of income through taxes and spending from the state budget. The aim of redistribution is an effort to eliminate income inequality and reduction of population at risk of poverty. Can the government through the provision of public services, transfer payments, and total government spending achieve the goals related to income inequality and poverty? Representatives of governments often point to the fact that the taxes paid can reduce income inequalities among individuals by withdrawing part of the revenue mainly of people with high incomes. These funds then directly (through transfer payments) or indirectly (in particular through public goods) are meant to help low-income residents. Through analysis of the impact of government spending on selected indicators of inequality (Gini coefficient, Misery Index and the number of people at risk of poverty), we measured the effectiveness of the use of government spending and thus the tax burden across the EU. Achieving the objectives of the Government's social policy has been measured by the correlation coefficient. Since almost all EU countries point to an equal share of government spending in GDP, government spending per capita of the country was chosen as a fundamental indicator of differentiation. Thus we can more closely scrutinize not only the effectiveness of government spending on selected indicators, but also whether the size of government spending affects correlation expenditures and selected indicators for measuring income inequality. In conclusion, we consider that not only the size of government spending, but especially the specifics of economic policy in the individual countries are more effective in the fight against poverty than the actual increase in government spending. Finding the appropriate size of government spending and tax rate, however, is not only an economic question, but often a political one.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata MADZINOVA, 2017. "Impact Of Government Spending On Income Inequality," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 210-220, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:210-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n2/20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. & Pao-Lin Tien, 2000. "Economic Discomfort and Consumer Sentiment," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-8, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cut Risya Varlitya & Raja Masbar & Abd. Jamal & Muhammad Nasir, 2023. "Do Regional Macroeconomics Variables Influence the Income Inequality in Indonesia?," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 180-199.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas M. Fullerton & Patricia Arellano-Olague, 2022. "Short-Term Household Economic Stress Effects on Retail Activity in El Paso, Texas," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 50(1), pages 27-35, June.
    2. Nestor Gandelman & Ruben Hernandez-Murillo, 2009. "The impact of inflation and unemployment on subjective personal and country evaluations," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 91(May), pages 107-126.
    3. Josefa Ramoni-Perazzi & Giampaolo Orlandoni-Merli, 2013. "El índice de miseria corregido por informalidad: una aplicación al caso de Venezuela," Revista Ecos de Economía, Universidad EAFIT, December.
    4. E. Philip Howrey, 2001. "The Predictive Power of the Index of Consumer Sentiment," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 32(1), pages 175-216.
    5. K. Moses Tule & Eunice Ngozi Egbuna & Eme Dada & Godday Uwawunkonye Ebuh, 2017. "A dynamic fragmentation of the misery index in Nigeria," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1336295-133, January.
    6. Anastasiou, Dimitris & Kallandranis, Christos & Drakos, Konstantinos, 2022. "Borrower discouragement prevalence for Eurozone SMEs: Investigating the impact of economic sentiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 161-171.
    7. Sakiru Adebola Solarin & Luis A. Gil-Alana & Carmen Lafuente, 2020. "Persistence of the Misery Index in African Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 825-841, February.
    8. Filip Premik & Ewa Stanisławska, 2017. "The Impact of Inflation Expectations on Polish Consumers’ Spending and Saving," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 3-28, January.
    9. Vuchelen, Jef, 2004. "Consumer sentiment and macroeconomic forecasts," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 493-506, August.
    10. Brigitte Desroches & Marc-André Gosselin, 2002. "The Usefulness of Consumer Confidence Indexes in the United States," Staff Working Papers 02-22, Bank of Canada.
    11. Yadollah Dadgar & Rouhollah Nazari, 2018. "The impact of economic growth and good governance on misery index in Iranian economy," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 175-193, February.
    12. Luis Rene Caceres, 2019. "Determinants of trust in government in Latin America," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 14(3), pages 329-351, Julio - S.
    13. Ivan K. Cohen & Fabrizio Ferretti & Bryan McIntosh, 2014. "Decomposing the misery index: A dynamic approach," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-8, December.
    14. Fernando Sánchez López, 2022. "Measuring the Effect of the Misery Index on International Tourist Departures: Empirical Evidence from Mexico," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Tugce Acar & Derya Topdag, 2022. "OECD Ulkelerinde Sefalet Endeksi ve Ekonomik Kalkinma Ekseninde Saglik Harcamalarinin Belirleyicileri: Toplamsal Olmayan Sabit Etkili Panel Kantil Regresyon Yaklasimi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(82), pages 267-286, June.
    16. Abdul Saboor & Shumaila Sadiq & Atta Ullah Khan & Gulnaz Hameed, 2017. "Dynamic Reflections of Crimes, Quasi Democracy and Misery Index in Pakistan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 31-45, August.
    17. Emmanuel Mensah & Christopher Boachie, 2023. "Analysis of the determinants of corporate governance quality: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 431-450, December.
    18. Roberto Golinelli & Giuseppe Parigi, 2003. "What is this thing called confidence? A comparative analysis of consumer confidence indices in eight major countries," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 484, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Darren Grant, 2009. "What Makes a Good Economy? An Analysis of Survey Data," Working Papers 0909, Sam Houston State University, Department of Economics and International Business.
    20. Ivan Roberts & John Simon, 2001. "What do Sentiment Surveys Measure?," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2001-09, Reserve Bank of Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    government spending; the Gini coefficient; Misery Index; poverty; the EU countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
    • H - Public Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:210-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.