IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i1p753-758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation: Literature Review And Time Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Pintea Mirela-Oana

    (Universitatea Babes-Bolyai, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor)

Abstract

Performance evaluation of an economic entity requires approaching several criteria, such as industry and economic entity type, managerial and entrepreneurial strategy, competitive environment, human and material resources available, using a system of appropriate performance indicators for this purpose.The exigencies of communication occurred on the growing number of phenomena that marked the global economy in recent decades (internationalization and relocation of business crises and turmoil in financial markets), demand performance measurement to be made in a comprehensive way by financial and non-financial criteria. Indicators are measures of performance used by management to measure, report and improve performance of the economic entity. The relationship between indicators and management is ensured by the existence of performance measurement systems. Studies to date indicate that economic entities using balanced performance measurement systems as a key management tool registered superior performance compared to entities not using such systems. This study attempts to address the issue of performance evaluation by presenting opinions of different authors concerning the process of performance measurement and to present, after revising the literature, the evolution of the performance evaluation systems. We tried to do this literature review because sustainable development and, therefore, globalization require new standards of performance that exceeds the economic field, both for domestic companies as well as international ones. So, these standards should be integrated into corporate strategy development to ensure sustainability of activities undertaken by harmonizing the economic, social and environmental objectives. To assess the performance of economic entities it is required that performance evaluation to be done with a balanced multidimensional system, including both financial ratios and non-financial indicators in order to reduce the limits of the two categories of indicators. Performance measurement and management canâ€(tm)t be separated; performance management is a philosophy that is supported by performance measurement. Performance management precedes performance measurement and creates the context for performance measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Pintea Mirela-Oana, 2012. "Performance Evaluation: Literature Review And Time Evolution," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 753-758, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:753-758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n1/108.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirela-Oana PINTEA & Melinda Timea FÜLÖP, 2014. "Corporate Governance And Performance In The Context Of Sustainable Development," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 519-526, November.
    2. HADA Izabela Diana & MIHALCEA Mihaela Maria, 2020. "The Importance Of Profitability Indicators In Assessing The Financial Performance Of Economic Entities," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 219-228, July.
    3. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Ruxandra-Ioana Curea-Pitorac, 2017. "Testing the Correlations between Corporate Giving, Performance and Company Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Hada Izabela Diana & Burja Vasile, 2018. "Interference Between Profit And Cash-Flow In Evaluating Economic Performance," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 96-101, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siti Aisyah Ya?kob & Mohd Uzairi Ahmad Hajazi & Nor Afiza Abu Bakar & Sharizal Hashim, 2019. "The Influence of Information Sharing Linkages on Business Performance: Evidence from Micro and Small Enterprises in Sarawak," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, January.
    2. Schneider, Christian O. & Bremen, Philipp & Schönsleben, Paul & Alard, Robert, 2013. "Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: Assessing regional differences and implications for performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 243-254.
    3. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    5. Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2011. "A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 177-187, November.
    6. Ekaterina Khitilova, 2017. "The Suitability of Expert System Application in Czech Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 653-660.
    7. Ra’ed Masa’deh & Ismail Muheisen & Bader Obeidat & Ashraf Bany Mohammad, 2022. "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Operational Performance: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Xiaohong Liu & Liguo Zhou & Yen-Chun Jim Wu, 2015. "Supply Chain Finance in China: Business Innovation and Theory Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-21, November.
    9. H. Khorshidian & M. Akbarpour Shirazi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi, 2019. "An intelligent truck scheduling and transportation planning optimization model for product portfolio in a cross-dock," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 163-184, January.
    10. Andrea Chiarini, 2017. "Environmental Policies for Evaluating Suppliers' Performance Based on GRI Indicators," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 98-111, January.
    11. Chang, Sheng-Lin & Wang, Reay-Chen & Wang, Shih-Yuan, 2007. "Applying a direct multi-granularity linguistic and strategy-oriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1013-1025, March.
    12. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2016. "Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 41-53.
    13. Jędrzej Charłampowicz, 2018. "Supply Chain Efficiency On The Maritime Container Shipping Markets – Selected Issues," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 357-368.
    14. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Dang, Shuo & Chu, Liangyong, 2016. "Evaluation framework and verification for sustainable container management as reusable packaging," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1949-1955.
    16. Wang, Shih-Yuan & Chang, Sheng-Lin & Wang, Reay-Chen, 2009. "Assessment of supplier performance based on product-development strategy by applying multi-granularity linguistic term sets," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 215-226, February.
    17. Ilkka Sillanpää, 2012. "Empirical Study of Measuring Supply Chain Performance," MIC 2012: Managing Transformation with Creativity; Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Budapest, 22–24 November 2012 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    18. Chowdhury, Md Maruf H. & Quaddus, Mohammed, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 185-204.
    19. Denise Ravet, 2012. "An exploration of facility location metrics in international supply chain," Post-Print hal-00747397, HAL.
    20. Milan Andrejić, 2023. "Modeling Retail Supply Chain Efficiency: Exploration and Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    performance; performance measurement; indicators; sustainable development; global performance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:753-758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.