IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2011i2p636-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Intellectual Capital Statement And The Balanced Scorecard As Complementary Models In Measuring Firm Intangibles

Author

Listed:
  • Veltri Stefania

    (University of Calabria, Economics)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of two different new management tool, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Intellectual Capital Report (ICR) in managing and reporting intangibles. Unlike the majority of IC scholars the author, and consistently with Bukh et al. (2005), the author starts from the idea that BSC and ICR are not alternative, but complementary tools in measuring intangibles, addressing different needs for firms that measure, manage and report intangibles. The research hypothesis of the paper will be demonstrated through the analysis of a case study of an Italian group which use both intangibles' reporting systems. A case study methodology has been chosen, given that it is widely used by researchers and provide the basis for the application of ideas and extension of methods (Yin, 1994). Intercos group has been chosen to test the research hypothesis, since it makes use of both models in measuring and reporting intangibles. The study of the case Intercos group found evidence that the two types of extended reporting are different and yet complementary and that both tools are necessary for firm in measuring IC, since they address different aims. This includes therefore a marked difference in use of indicators, given that IC indicators in the ICR have to support the overall aims derived by company's strategy, while BSC indicators provides a breakdown of strategic goals with respect to profitability, growth etc. The contribution of the paper to the IC literature is to extend the findings of the Bukh et al.'s (2003) study, investigating the hypothesis (and finding evidence) that BSC and ICR are complementary in reporting intangibles in an Italian group. Implications of the paper are for company's manager, who increase the awareness that they have at their disposal two management tools, with address different aims, to manage intangibles.

Suggested Citation

  • Veltri Stefania, 2011. "The Intellectual Capital Statement And The Balanced Scorecard As Complementary Models In Measuring Firm Intangibles," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 636-642, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:636-642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2011/n2/090.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bontis, Nick & Dragonetti, Nicola C. & Jacobsen, Kristine & Roos, Göran, 1999. "The knowledge toolbox:: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 391-402, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Indra Abeysekera, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management Research towards Value Creation. From the Past to the Future," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Daniel RUSU, 2022. "Association of Knowledge Management with Strategic Management: Directions and Trends at International Level," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 49-66, February.
    4. Ayat Sami ODEIBAT, 2021. "The Effect Of Technology Evolution On The Future Of Jobs," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 57-67, June.
    5. O. Zeynep Akşin, 2007. "On valuing appreciating human assets in services," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 221-235, March.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3748 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Giuseppe Marzo, 2013. "Some Unintended Consequences of Metaphors: The Case of Capital in Intellectual Capital Research," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 111-140.
    8. Ljupco Eftimov; & Lucija Eftimova & Marina Serafimoska, 2008. "The Importance Of Balanced Scorecard As A Strategic Management Tool And Its Implementation In The Companies In R. Macedonia And Worldwide," Journal Articles, Center For Economic Analyses, pages 21-32, December.
    9. Angel Barajas & Elena Shakina, 2012. "The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital Quality And Corporate Performances: An Empirical Study Of Russian And European Companies," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 57(192), pages 79-98, January –.
    10. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Salvador Roig-Dobón, 2016. "Main drivers of human capital, learning and performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 961-978, October.
    11. Rizwan Ellahi & Noman Mahmood & Bazla Ali Khan, 2020. "Concept of Inclusive Optimal Performance (IOP): Theoretical and Conceptual understanding on the inclusive relationship between Internal Simultaneous Performance (ISP) and External Simultaneous Perform," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 16(1), pages 101-124.
    12. Norasyikin Shaikh Ibrahim & Junaidah Hashim & Rozailin Abdul Rahman, 2018. "The Impact of Employer Branding and Career Growth on Talent Retention: The Mediating Role of Recruitment Practices in the Malaysian Public Sector," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(6), pages 1034-1053, June.
    13. Rossidis Ioannis & Dimitrios Belias, 2020. "Combining Strategic Management with Knowledge Management: Trends and International Perspectives," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 39-45.
    14. Mohamed Ali Boujelbene & Habib Affes, 2013. "Perceptions Du Capital Intellectuel Par Les Managers Etude Empirique Dans Le Contexte Tunisien," Post-Print hal-00991699, HAL.
    15. Ferrer, Julian & Ríos, Manriquez, 2006. "Administración del conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Un análisis conceptual [Knowledge management in higher education. A conceptual analysis]," MPRA Paper 2622, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Adamu Jibir & Musa Abdu, 2021. "Human Capital and Propensity to Protect Intellectual Properties as Innovation Output: the Case of Nigerian Manufacturing and Service Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 595-619, June.
    17. Charles Daussy, 2013. "Can Social Responsibility Paradoxically Strengthen The Importance Of Finance?," Post-Print hal-01002375, HAL.
    18. Faryal Siddiqui, 2012. "Human Capital Management: An Emerging Human Resource Management Practice," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 353-367, February.
    19. Faizi Weqar & Ahmed Musa Khan & Mohd. Anas Raushan & S. M. Imamul Haque, 2021. "Measuring the Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Financial Performance of the Finance Sector of India," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(3), pages 1134-1151, September.
    20. Prasoon Mani Tripathi & Varun Chotia & Umesh Solanki & Rahul Meena & Vinay Khandelwal, 2022. "Economic Value Added Research: Mapping Thematic Structure and Research Trends," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    21. Guangchun Jin & Jian Xu, 2022. "Does Intellectual Capital Affect Financial Leverage of Chinese Agricultural Companies? Exploring the Role of Firm Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intellectual capital report; balanced scorecard; complementary models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:636-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.