IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnllfa/108.00000015.html

Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Hamdani, Assaf
  • Kandel, Eugene
  • Mugerman, Yevgeny
  • Yafeh, Yishay

Abstract

Concerned with excessive risk-taking, regulators worldwide generally prohibit performance-based fees in pension funds. Presumably, competition can substitute for incentive pay in providing incentives for fund managers to serve their clients’ interests. Using a regulatory experiment from Israel, we compare the performance of three exogenously-given long-term savings schemes: Funds with performance-based fees, facing no competition; funds with assetsunder- management (AUM)-based fees and virtually no competition; and funds with AUM-based fees, operating in a competitive environment. Funds with performance-based fees exhibit the highest risk-adjusted returns without assuming more risk. Competitive pressure is not associated with similar outcomes, suggesting that incentives and competition are not substitutes in the retirement savings industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamdani, Assaf & Kandel, Eugene & Mugerman, Yevgeny & Yafeh, Yishay, 2017. "Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(1), pages 49-86, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jnllfa:108.00000015
    DOI: 10.1561/108.00000015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/108.00000015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/108.00000015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Hecht, Yoel & Wiener, Zvi, 2019. "On the failure of mutual fund industry regulation," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 51-72.
    2. Yevgeny Mugerman & Nadav Steinberg, 2024. "How Do Mutual Fund Management Fee Changes Impact Mutual Fund Flows," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2024.12, Bank of Israel.
    3. Servaes, Henri & Sigurdsson, Kari, 2022. "The Costs and Benefits of Performance Fees in Mutual Funds," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Taejin Han & Dariusz Stańko, 2020. "Pension scheme fees and charge ratios in 44 countries: A comparative study," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 73(1), pages 99-137, January.
    5. Abudy, Menachem (Meni) & Gildin, Ilan & Mugerman, Yevgeny, 2024. "Don't move my cheese: Financial advice adaptation to regulatory change," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Beni Lauterbach & Yevgeny Mugerman, 2020. "The Effect of Institutional Investors’ Voice on the Terms and Outcome of Freeze-out Tender Offers," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 1-33, February.
    7. Efrat Dressler & Yevgeny Mugerman, 2023. "Doing the Right Thing? The Voting Power Effect and Institutional Shareholder Voting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1089-1112, April.
    8. Ben-Rubi, Shoham & Mugerman, Yevgeny & Wiener, Zvi, 2024. "Regulating cash holdings: Assessing lost returns in mutual funds✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    9. (Meni) Abudy, Menachem & Gildin, Ilan & Mugerman, Yevgeny, 2022. "Do computerized traders follow social norms? Evidence from the holocaust remembrance moment of silence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Sade, Orly & Winter, Eyal, 2020. "Out-of-pocket vs. out-of-investment in financial advisory fees: Evidence from the lab," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnllfa:108.00000015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.