IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/fntent/0300000121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generative AI in Entrepreneurship Research: Principles and Practical Guidance for Intelligence Augmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Ferrati
  • Phillip H. Kim
  • Moreno Muffatto

Abstract

This monograph investigates the integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into the academic research process of entrepreneurship. Specifically, we explore using Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT in several research scenarios to support novice and established researchers. As a practical guide, we introduce researchers to prompt engineering – formulating instructions for the LLMs to generate a desired output. We classify different types of prompts, present various technical strategies, and suggest the design of an effective prompt formula. We illustrate the prompt engineering process with different examples for entrepreneurship research.To assist researchers in systematically integrating LLMs into their research process, we present the “4D-Framework,” which consists of four phases (Discover, Develop, Discuss, and Deliver). Each phase contains four functions accomplished through four prompts, resulting in 16 functions and 64 specific prompts. The initial stage, “Discover,” involves using LLMs for project initiation tasks such as topic selection and literature review, theory exploration, conceptual or empirical puzzles, and research question identification. During the “Develop” phase, the focus shifts to operational aspects, where LLMs assist in designing methods, executing qualitative and quantitative research, and generating programming code. The third phase, “Discuss,” focuses on using LLMs to analyze findings, evaluate their robustness and limitations, highlight the research contribution, and identify future research directions. Finally, the “Deliver” phase emphasizes using LLMs to draft the manuscript, craft the narrative, prepare for submission, and disseminate the findings.We describe the application of LLMs in entrepreneurship research from a human-centric perspective, emphasizing an Intelligence Augmentation (IA) perspective for harmonizing human intelligence with AI capabilities. Given the novelty and impact of LLMs in knowledge-based areas, we also address the ethical implications of using AI in academia. We urge scholars to incorporate AI and LLMs into their research responsibly. While showcasing their potential, we also address their current limitations. We empower scholars to adopt a dynamic, AI-enhanced research approach that emphasizes the potential to unlock new insights and enhance the integrity of academic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Ferrati & Phillip H. Kim & Moreno Muffatto, 2024. "Generative AI in Entrepreneurship Research: Principles and Practical Guidance for Intelligence Augmentation," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 20(3), pages 245-383, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:fntent:0300000121
    DOI: 10.1561/0300000121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/0300000121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siddharth Vedula & Phillip H Kim, 2019. "Gimme shelter or fade away: the impact of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem quality on venture survival," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 827-854.
    2. Vincent, Vinod U., 2021. "Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 425-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kusetogullari & Huseyin Kusetogullari & Martin Andersson & Tony Gorschek, 2025. "GenAI in Entrepreneurship: a systematic review of generative artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship research: current issues and future directions," Papers 2505.05523, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Kaur, Puneet & Ferraris, Alberto & Bresciani, Stefano & Dhir, Amandeep, 2024. "Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Yating Li & Martin Kenney & Donald Patton & Abraham Song, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and industry knowledge: does the winning region take all?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 153-172, June.
    3. Gotsopoulos, Aleksios & Pitsakis, Konstantinos, 2024. "United we stand? Organizational groups and spinoff mortality in the context of academic entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    4. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    5. van Dijk, Jasper & Leendertse, Jip & Stam, Erik & van Rijnsoever, Frank, 2025. "The entrepreneurial ecosystem clock keeps on ticking – A replication and extension of Coad and Srhoj (2023)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    6. Leendertse, Jip & Schrijvers, Mirella & Stam, Erik, 2022. "Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    7. Razieh Nejabat & Marina Van Geenhuizen, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking in Sustainable Energy: University Spin-Off Firms and Market Introduction in Northwest Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Prokop, Daniel, 2021. "University entrepreneurial ecosystems and spinoff companies: Configurations, developments and outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Coad, Alex & Srhoj, Stjepan, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional persistence of high growth firms: A ‘broken clock’ critique," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    10. Fahimeh Khatami & Enrico Cagno & Luboš Smrčka & Zoltan Rozsa, 2024. "Assessing the role of FinTech in entrepreneurial ecosystems at the international level," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3373-3402, December.
    11. Kapturkiewicz, Agata, 2022. "Varieties of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A comparative study of Tokyo and Bangalore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    12. Liu, Jiali & Zhou, Haibo & Chen, Feng & Yu, Jiang, 2022. "The coevolution of innovation ecosystems and the strategic growth paths of knowledge-intensive enterprises: The case of China’s integrated circuit design industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 428-439.
    13. Jeffrey Muldoon & Younggeun Lee & Eric W. Liguori & Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Satish Kumar, 2024. "Mapping the entrepreneurship ecosystem scholarship: current state and future directions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3035-3080, December.
    14. Maksim Belitski & Ana-Maria Grigore & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Political entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship ecosystem perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1973-2004, December.
    15. Daniel Sunghwan Cho & Paul Ryan & Giulio Buciuni, 2022. "Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1865-1883, April.
    16. Roundy, Philip T. & Randy Evans, W., 2024. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems as multiteam systems: Navigating independence and interdependence in the leadership of startup communities," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    17. Shi, Xianwei & Shi, Yongjiang, 2022. "Unpacking the process of resource allocation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    18. Junping Yang & Mengjie Zhang, 2021. "The value of entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial ecosystem: Evidence from 265 cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2256-2271, December.
    19. Jing Wang & Zeyu Xing & Rui Zhang, 2023. "AI technology application and employee responsibility," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Jean-Michel Dalle & Matthijs Besten & Jeremie Morfin, 2025. "Accelerator-mediated access to investors among early-stage start-ups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 1925-1952, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:fntent:0300000121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.