IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/gtwdoq/8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of the system of indicators for the efficiency evaluation of the production capacity of industrial enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Skrynkovskyy Ruslan

    (Lviv University of Business and Law)

  • Sopilnyk Rostyslav

    (Lviv University of Business and Law)

  • Seliverstova Liudmyla

    (Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics)

  • Koropetskyi Oleh

    (Lviv University of Business and Law)

  • Protsiuk Tetiana

    (Academy of Financial Monitoring, Kyiv)

Abstract

The object of research is the features of the formation, use and improvement of the system of indicators to assess the efficiency of the production potential of industrial enterprises. One of the main characteristics of the development of an industrial enterprise and the formation of its prospects, regardless of the goals set, is to ensure optimal competitiveness, stability, sustainable development, etc. – its potential, in particular production. It was found that the production potential is the existing and potential possibilities for the production of real output (in accordance with the needs of the market), the availability of production factors, the availability of basic types of resources. Here, analysis, systematization, synthesis and explanation of factors affecting the efficiency of the production potential of an industrial enterprise in the system to ensure its competitiveness are important. In the context of this, the graphical model of the interconnection of strategic plans and programs of industrial enterprises is improved. And also features, a role and a place of industrial enterprise production capacities in the hierarchy of factors (competitive forces) determining its competitiveness are taken into account. In the process of research, the methods of system analysis, systematization, generalization and methods of economic and mathematical modeling are used. According to the research results, it is established that for the effective use of the production potential of industrial enterprises it is necessary to ensure management on the basis of complete and objective information about the state of the components of the production potential by a system of relative indicators (coefficients). This system should correspond to the modern understanding of the essence of the concept of "efficiency", its types (financial and economic, industrial, commercial), strategic plans and programs, and strategies. The system of indicators is improved to assess the efficiency of the industrial potential of industrial enterprises, which takes into account the hierarchy of factors (competitive forces) determining its competitiveness, taking into account the main forces operating in the microenvironment of the enterprise. The presented studies should be taken into account when improving the fundamental (in-depth) system for diagnosing the production activities of industrial enterprises (as a partial diagnostic goal in the system of economic diagnostics goals).

Suggested Citation

  • Skrynkovskyy Ruslan & Sopilnyk Rostyslav & Seliverstova Liudmyla & Koropetskyi Oleh & Protsiuk Tetiana, 2019. "Improvement of the system of indicators for the efficiency evaluation of the production capacity of industrial enterprises," Technology audit and production reserves, 2(46) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(46)), pages 49-51.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:gtwdoq:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/162670
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skrynkovskyy Ruslan & Pavlenchyk Nataliya & Horbonos Fedir & Protsiuk Tetiana, 2018. "Improvement of the express diagnostics of the production activity of the enterprise taking into account the method of determining the optimal production programs in the operational management system," Technology audit and production reserves, 6(44) 2018, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 6(4(44)), pages 4-10.
    2. Toyohiro Kono, 1984. "Strategy and Structure of Japanese Enterprises," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-17627-4, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skrynkovskyy Ruslan & Sopilnyk Lyubomyr & Heorhiadi Nellі & Kniaz Sviatoslav, 2019. "Improvement of the model of the innovative development of the production system of industrial enterprises," Technology audit and production reserves, 1(45) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 1(4(45)), pages 51-53.
    2. Ruslan Skrynkovskyy & Lyubomyr Sopilnyk & Fedir Horbonos & Sviatoslav Kniaz & Nataliia Pavlenchyk & Volodymyr Yuzevych, 2019. "Improvement of the Model for Calculating the Operating Profit of Industrial Enterprises Taking into Account the Problem of Optimal Distribution of Productive Resources," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 5(3), pages 5011-5017, March.
    3. Ulgado, Francis M., 1997. "Location decision-making characteristics of foreign direct investment in the United States," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 271-293, June.
    4. Park, Namgyoo K. & Cho, Dong-Sung, 1997. "The effect of strategic alliance on performance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 155-164.
    5. Baruch A. Kipnis & Erik A. Swyngedouw, 1988. "Manufacturing Plant Size - Toward a Regional Strategy. A Case Study in Limburg, Belgium," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 43-52, February.
    6. Hideshi Itoh, 2003. "Corporate Restructuring in Japan Part I: Can M‐Form Organization Manage Diverse Businesses?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 54(1), pages 49-73, March.
    7. Stuart Holland & Andrew Black, 2018. "Cherchez la Firme: Redressing the Missing – Meso – Middle in Mainstream Economics," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 15-53, November.
    8. Michael Hechter & Satoshi Kanazawa, 1993. "Group Solidarity and Social Order in Japan," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 5(4), pages 455-493, October.
    9. John Benson, 1994. "The Economic Effects of Unionism on Japanese Manufacturing Enterprises," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Gregory Wegmann & Johei Oshita, 2018. "A comparison between Japanese and French cost management-Contingency and institutional perspectives," Post-Print halshs-01961763, HAL.
    11. Brouthers, Lance Eliot & Lamb, Charles W., 1995. "National ideology, public policy, and the business environment: A contingency approach to economic reform in Hungary, Poland and Eastern Europe," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 355-372, September.
    12. Hodaka Morita, 2002. "Multiskilling, Delegation, and Continuous Process Improvement: A Comparative Analysis of U.S.-Japanese Work Organizations," Labor and Demography 0207004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Hideaki Sakawa & Naoki Watanabel, 2021. "Family Control and Corporate Innovation in Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    efficiency of the production potential of the enterprise; production program of the enterprise; production capacity of the enterprise; operational management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:gtwdoq:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.