IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/40.html

Conducting an audit using system modeling tools in the development of deposits of flux raw materials

Author

Listed:
  • Tereshchenko Maryna

    (Dnipro University of Technology)

Abstract

The object of research is an audit, which should be carried out to assess and feasibility of further development of new deposits of flux raw materials for the needs of the metallurgical industry and attracting potential investors. Some of the most problematic areas are limited by the economic potential of open pits for expanded reproduction and the difficulty of attracting investments due to the low investment attractiveness of the deposits. The analysis of the current state of deposits of flux raw materials is carried out on the example of Ukraine. The main characteristics of the low investment attractiveness of limestone and dolomite quarries are determined. The need for an in-depth audit of the financial and economic activities of a quarry is determined, taking into account the specifics of the extraction of flux raw materials In the course of the study, system modeling tools are used to calculate the feasibility of developing new sites. The primary stages of the audit are shown to determine the feasibility of further development of new sections of flux raw materials, the production volumes of which will meet the needs of the metallurgical industry, subject to a competitive price of fluxes on the market. These stages provide for an assessment of the feasibility of further development of sections of flux raw materials and an analysis of the throughput of narrow links of the quarry to determine the amount of investment in making management decisions on these issues. For their implementation, an economic and mathematical model for optimizing the parameters is proposed to determine the economic feasibility of developing flux feedstock reserves in new areas, if the alternative is the loss of reserves in the underground resources. This ensures a reduction in the labor intensity of the check and its terms. In comparison with similar well-known methods, the proposed approaches will reduce the amount of audit costs paid by the audit customer.

Suggested Citation

  • Tereshchenko Maryna, 2020. "Conducting an audit using system modeling tools in the development of deposits of flux raw materials," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 4(4(54)), pages 4-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/210766
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alla Savchenko & Kateryna Saliamon-Mikhieieva & Marianna Holynska, 2018. "Analysis And Audit Of Key Economic Indicators Of Economic Entities (A Case Study Of The Dairy Industry)," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(3).
    2. Ion Croitoru & George Calota, 2012. "The Importance of Financial Accounting Information in the Internal Audit," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3-4), pages 65-70, September.
    3. Biddle, Gary C. & Hilary, Gilles & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2009. "How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2-3), pages 112-131, December.
    4. Slobodan Popović & Jelena Tošković & Aleksandar Majstorović & Sandra Brkanlić & Andrea Katić, 2015. "The Importance Of Continuous Audit Of Financial Statements Of The Company Of Countries Joining The Eu," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 241-246, July.
    5. Atila Karkacier & Fatih Coskun Ertas, 2017. "Independent Auditing Effect on Investment Decisions of Institutional Investors," Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 297-319, September.
    6. Angel Arturo Pacheco Paredes & Clark Wheatley, 2019. "The effect of changing fiscal year-ends on audit fees and audit quality," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 365-382, November.
    7. Marcu Niculina & Ene Sebastian George, 2010. "The role of the audit report in the enterprise evaluation," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 1675-1679, May.
    8. Brent, Daniel A. & Ward, Michael B., 2018. "Energy efficiency and financial literacy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 181-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Chen & Shuwen Pi & Qing Sophie Wang, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Working Papers in Economics 25/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    2. Chan-Jane Lin & Tawei Wang & Chao-Jung Pan, 2016. "Financial reporting quality and investment decisions for family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 499-532, June.
    3. Xin Qu & Majella Percy & Fang Hu & Jenny Stewart, 2022. "Can CEO equity‐based compensation limit investment‐related agency problems?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2579-2614, June.
    4. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    5. Koomson, Isaac & Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi & Smyth, Russell, 2025. "Financial literacy and clean energy adoption in South Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Lin, Ling & Xiao, Min & Yao, Rongrong & Zhang, Xiaoying, 2024. "Product market liberalization and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Chen, Chunhua & Jiang, Dequan & Lan, Meng & Li, Weiping & Ye, Ling, 2022. "Does environmental regulation affect labor investment Efficiency?Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-95.
    8. Baolei Qi & Liuchuang Li & Qing Zhou & Jinghui Sun, 2017. "Does internal control over financial reporting really alleviate agency conflicts?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(4), pages 1101-1125, December.
    9. Amir Ghafourian Shagerdi & Ali Mahdavipour & Reza Jahanshiri Ariyan Tashakori Baghdar & Mohammad Sajjad Ghafourian Shagerdi, 2020. "Investment Efficiency and Audit Fee from the Perspective of the Role of Financial Distress," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 318-333.
    10. Yinglin Wang & Leqi Chen & Jiaxin Zhuang, 2024. "Research on ESG Investment Efficiency Regulation from the Perspective of Reciprocity and Evolutionary Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1665-1695, September.
    11. Serhii Kanyhin & Svitlana Achkasova & Viktoriia Tyschenko & Vlada Karpova & Oleksii Naidenko, 2025. "Bankruptcy Risks Assessment: A Comprehensive Review of Qualitative Indicators," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 22-44.
    12. Moon Kyung Cho & Minjung Kang, 2024. "Executives Implicated in Financial Reporting Fraud and Firms’ Investment Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Samuel B. Bonsall & Brian P. Miller, 2017. "The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 608-643, June.
    14. Boasiako, Kwabena Antwi & Adasi Manu, Sylvester & Antwi-Darko, Nana Yaw, 2022. "Does financing influence the sensitivity of cash and investment to asset tangibility?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Zuo, Junqing & Zhang, Wei & Ruan, Chenghao & Xiong, Xiong, 2024. "A blessing or a curse? Non-local mutual fund holdings and firm investment efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Erkan, Asligul & Nguyen, Trung, 2021. "Does inside debt help mitigate agency problems? The case with investment inefficiency and payout policies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    17. Zhe Li & Oksana Pryshchepa & Bo Wang, 2023. "Financial experts on the top management team: Do they reduce investment inefficiency?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 198-235, January.
    18. Chen, Shenglan & Lin, Bingxuan & Lu, Rui & Ma, Hui, 2016. "Pay for accounting performance and R&D investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 142-153.
    19. David Vidal-Tomás & Simone Alfarano, 2020. "An agent-based early warning indicator for financial market instability," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(1), pages 49-87, January.
    20. Lee, Eugenia Y. & Ha, Wonsuk & Park, Sunyoung, 2023. "Auditor specialization in R&D and clients’ R&D investment-q sensitivity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.