IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2020i45p208-218.html

Participation of fast-growing SMEs in international trade and implications for public policy

Author

Listed:
  • Kuzyk, M.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Simachev, Yu.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Fedyunina, A.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

This study explores participation of Russian fast-growing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in international trade and delivers the evidence of the effects of public policy support on growth and export activity. We show that small and medium sized enterprises that can be attributed to fast-growing firms, have higher export activity, but higher growth rates for them are dominated by growth of domestic sales. Regarding market orientation of Russian firms, we find that fast-growing SMEs are more oriented towards non-CIS markets (primarily, Asian) in comparison to other exporting SMEs. We explore the effects of sanctions and find that fast-growing firms more often entered new country markets than other SMEs. We show that SMEs and fast-growing firms working on foreign markets more intensively use digital technologies. Fast-growing SMEs demonstrate lower dependence on technology imports and higher interest in developing and introducing technologies. We explore public policy support for SMEs and find that government support measures are poorly targeted at small companies in comparison to large business and contribute little to firms' growth and increase of their export activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuzyk, M. & Simachev, Yu. & Fedyunina, A., 2020. "Participation of fast-growing SMEs in international trade and implications for public policy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 45(1), pages 208-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2020:i:45:p:208-218
    DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2020-45-1-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2020-45-208-218r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-45-1-11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yudanov, A., 2010. "Embodiments of Entrepreneurial Spirit: «Gazelle-Firms» in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 5, pages 92-109.
    2. Simachev, Y. & Kuzyk, M. & Zudin, N., 2017. "The Impact of Public Funding and Tax Incentives on Russian Firms: Additionality Effects Evaluation," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 59-93.
    3. Whitney K. Newey, 2009. "Treatment effects (in Russian)," Quantile, Quantile, issue 6, pages 15-23, March.
    4. Etienne St-Jean & Pierre-André Julien & Josée Audet, 2008. "Factors Associated With Growth Changes In "Gazelles"," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 161-188.
    5. Daniela Livia Trașcă & George Marian Ștefan & Daniela Nicoleta Sahlian & Răzvan Hoinaru & George-Laurențiu Șerban-Oprescu, 2019. "Digitalization and Business Activity. The Struggle to Catch Up in CEE Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Alex Coad & Sven-Olov Daunfeldt & Werner Hölzl & Dan Johansson & Paul Nightingale, 2014. "High-growth firms: introduction to the special section," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(1), pages 91-112, February.
    7. David Greenaway & Richard Kneller, 2007. "Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(517), pages 134-161, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Kalita & Alexander Chepurenko, 2020. "Competitiveness of Small and Medium Businesses and Competitive Pressure in the Manufacturing Industry," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 36-50.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarra Kouada & Bénédicte Aldebert & Serge Amabile, 2018. "L’hypercroissance des start-up n’est pas un long fleuve tranquille : rôle et place des structures d’accompagnement ?," Post-Print halshs-01943501, HAL.
    2. Kovács, Olivér, 2020. "Gazellák az iparpolitika tükrében, I [Gazelles and industrial policy, Part 1]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 54-87.
    3. Ivan Savin & Maria Novitskaya, 2023. "Data-driven definitions of gazelle companies that rule out chance: application for Russia and Spain," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 507-542, September.
    4. Patricia Kotnik & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multi-country evidence," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 103-128.
    5. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2011. "R&D, Innovation and Exporting," SERC Discussion Papers 0073, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Roger Bandick & Holger Görg, 2016. "Foreign acquisition, plant survival, and employment growth," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT Volume 53: World Scientific Studies in International Economics, chapter 7, pages 115-141, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Cristina Fernández & Roberta García & Paloma Lopez-Garcia & Benedicta Marzinotto & Roberta Serafini & Juuso Vanhala & Ladislav Wintr, 2017. "Firm growth in Europe: An overview based on the COMPNET labour module," BCL working papers 107, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    8. Francesco Serti & Chiara Tomasi, 2008. "Self-Selection and Post-Entry Effects of Exports: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 144(4), pages 660-694, December.
    9. Naudé, Wim & Gries, Thomas & Bilkic, Natasa, 2015. "Playing the lottery or dressing up? A model of firm-level heterogeneity and the decision to export," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Arvanitis, Spyros & Hollenstein, Heinz & Stucki, Tobias, 2016. "Does the explanatory power of the OLI approach differ among sectors and business functions? Evidence from firm-level data," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 10, pages 1-46.
    11. Eva Hagsten & Patricia Kotnik, 2017. "ICT as facilitator of internationalisation in small- and medium-sized firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 431-446, February.
    12. Lee, Cassey, 2011. "Trade, productivity, and innovation: Firm-level evidence from Malaysian manufacturing," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 284-294, August.
    13. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    14. Ciarli, Tommaso & Coad, Alex & Moneta, Alessio, 2023. "Does exporting cause productivity growth? Evidence from Chilean firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 228-239.
    15. Bernat, Gonzalo, 2017. "Innovación en la industria manufacturera argentina durante la post convertibilidad," Documentos de Proyectos 44132, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    16. Frederico Oliveira Torres, 2019. "Firm heterogeneity and exports in Portugal - Identifying export potential," GEE Papers 0118, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Apr 2019.
    17. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    18. Hornungová, Jana & Petrová, Kateřina, . "The Relationship Between Digital Performance and Production of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU Countries: Correlation Analysis and ANOVA Method," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(01).
    19. Martin Andersson & Sara Johansson & Hans Lööf, 2012. "Firm Performance and International Trade – Evidence from a Small Open Economy," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Roger R. Stough (ed.), The Regional Economics of Knowledge and Talent, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Gábor Békés & Jörn Kleinert & Farid Toubal, 2009. "Spillovers from Multinationals to Heterogeneous Domestic Firms: Evidence from Hungary," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(10), pages 1408-1433, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • F61 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Microeconomic Impacts
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2020:i:45:p:208-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.