IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nax/conyad/v64y2019i1p41-42.html

Determinants of public funding for innovation in Chilean firms

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Mardones

    (Universidad de Concepción, Chile)

  • Annabella Zapata

    (Universidad de Concepción, Chile)

Abstract

In this study, different versions of the Innovation Surveys carried out in Chile are used to evaluate the factors that would explain the obtaining of public funding for innovative activities. In order to achieve this, the estimated results from binary election models are contrasted with cross-sectional and pseudo-panel data. It is concluded that with pseudo-panel data it is possible to identify some relevant factors not observed with cross-sectional data, for example those firms that invest in training their workers in R&D activities in the previous year have lower probabilities of obtaining public funding. In addition, the foreign firms have greater probabilities of achieving funding than national firms. The most striking result is that larger firms have greater probability of obtaining public funding, which is contradictory when considering that many public programs declare that they are aimed to support SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Mardones & Annabella Zapata, 2019. "Determinants of public funding for innovation in Chilean firms," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 64(1), pages 41-42, Enero-Mar.
    • Handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:64:y:2019:i:1:p:41-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cya.unam.mx/index.php/cya/article/view/1602/1348
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Álvarez & Claudio Bravo-Ortega & Andrés Zahler, 2015. "Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Chile," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 593-611, May.
    2. Baltagi, Badi H., 2013. "Panel Data Forecasting," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 995-1024, Elsevier.
    3. Claudio Bravo-Ortega & Jose Miguel Benavente & Álvaro González, 2014. "Innovation, Exports, and Productivity: Learning and Self-Selection in Chile," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1S), pages 68-95, January.
    4. Takalo, Tuomas & Tanayama, Tanja & Toivanen, Otto, 2008. "Evaluating innovation policy : a structural treatment effect model of R&D subsidies," Research Discussion Papers 7/2008, Bank of Finland.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mónica Espinosa-Blasco & Gabriel I. Penagos-Londoño & Felipe Ruiz-Moreno & María J. Vilaplana-Aparicio, 2024. "New Insights on the Allocation of Innovation Subsidies: A Machine Learning Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2704-2725, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuomas Takalo, 2012. "Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 1, pages 157-167.
    2. Laura Liu & Yulong Wang, 2025. "Binary Outcome Models with Extreme Covariates: Estimation and Prediction," Papers 2502.16041, arXiv.org.
    3. Naqeeb Ur Rehman, 2017. "Self-selection and learning-by-exporting hypotheses: micro-level evidence," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(1), pages 133-160, April.
    4. Nan, Shijing & Huo, Yuchen & You, Wanhai & Guo, Yawei, 2022. "Globalization spatial spillover effects and carbon emissions: What is the role of economic complexity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Giyoh G. Nginyu & Dobdinga C. Fonchamnyo & Boniface N. Epo & Simplice A. Asongu, 2023. "The effects of institutional quality and biocapacity on inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 23/044, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    6. Yongfu Huang & M. G. Quibria, 2013. "Green Growth: Theory and Evidence," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-056, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Long Q. Trinh, 2016. "Dynamics of Innovation and Internationalization among Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Viet Nam," ADBI Working Papers 580, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    8. Luca Grilli & Samuele Murtinu, 2011. "Econometric Evaluation of Public Policies for Science and Innovation: A Brief Guide to Practice," Chapters, in: Massimo G. Colombo & Luca Grilli & Lucia Piscitello & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra (ed.), Science and Innovation Policy for the New Knowledge Economy, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Bernard Fingleton & Silvia Palombi, 2016. "Bootstrap J -Test for Panel Data Models with Spatially Dependent Error Components, a Spatial Lag and Additional Endogenous Variables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 7-26, March.
    11. Josef Krause, 2016. "Evaluation Of The Impact Of Innovative Activites On Productivity – Example From The Czech Republic," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(2), pages 101-109, June.
    12. Morris, Diego M., 2018. "Innovation and productivity among heterogeneous firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1918-1932.
    13. Christian Brownlees & Vladislav Morozov, 2022. "Unit Averaging for Heterogeneous Panels," Papers 2210.14205, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    14. Bermúdez-Barrezueta, Natalia & Camino-Mogro, Segundo & Arboleda, Xavier, 2022. "Production and enterprise profitability in Ecuador’s crop-growing sector," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    15. Dezhina, I. & Simachev, Yu., 2013. "Matching Grants for Stimulating Partnerships between Companies and Universities in Innovation Area: Initial Effects in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 99-122.
    16. Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska & Anita Fajczak-Kowalska & Otakar Strunecky, 2021. "Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization in the Context of Macroeconomic Stabilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Enrico Marelli & Giovanni Bruno & Marcello Signorelli, 2013. "Young People in Crisis: NEETs and Unemployed in EU Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa13p895, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Daniel Borup & Bent Jesper Christensen & Yunus Emre Ergemen, 2019. "Assessing predictive accuracy in panel data models with long-range dependence," CREATES Research Papers 2019-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    19. Carlos José Miranda Victório & Helder Gomes Costa & Cristina Gomes de Souza, 2016. "Modeling selection criteria of R&D projects for awarding direct subsidies to the private sector," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 275-287.
    20. Hud, Martin & Hussinger, Katrin, 2015. "The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1844-1855.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:64:y:2019:i:1:p:41-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto García-Narvaez (Technical Editor) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcunamx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.