IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v7y2023i8d10.1038_s41562-023-01618-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic associations with parental investment from conception to wealth inheritance in six cohorts

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmin Wertz

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Terrie E. Moffitt

    (Duke University
    King’s College London
    University of Oslo
    Duke University)

  • Louise Arseneault

    (King’s College London)

  • J. C. Barnes

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Michel Boivin

    (Laval University)

  • David L. Corcoran

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Andrea Danese

    (King’s College London
    King’s College London
    National and Specialist CAMHS Clinic for Trauma, Anxiety and Depression, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Robert J. Hancox

    (University of Otago)

  • HonaLee Harrington

    (Duke University)

  • Renate M. Houts

    (Duke University)

  • Stephanie Langevin

    (Duke University
    Laval University)

  • Hexuan Liu

    (University of Cincinnati
    University of Cincinnati)

  • Richie Poulton

    (University of Otago)

  • Karen Sugden

    (Duke University
    Duke University)

  • Peter T. Tanksley

    (University of Texas at Austin
    University of Texas at Austin)

  • Benjamin S. Williams

    (Duke University
    Duke University)

  • Avshalom Caspi

    (Duke University
    King’s College London
    University of Oslo
    Duke University)

Abstract

Genetic inheritance is not the only way parents’ genes may affect children. It is also possible that parents’ genes are associated with investments into children’s development. We examined evidence for links between parental genetics and parental investments, from the prenatal period through to adulthood, using data from six population-based cohorts in the UK, US and New Zealand, together totalling 36,566 parents. Our findings revealed associations between parental genetics—summarized in a genome-wide polygenic score—and parental behaviour across development, from smoking in pregnancy, breastfeeding in infancy, parenting in childhood and adolescence, to leaving a wealth inheritance to adult children. Effect sizes tended to be small at any given time point, ranging from RR = 1.12 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.09, 1.15) to RR = 0.76 (95%CI 0.72, 0.80) during the prenatal period and infancy; β = 0.07 (95%CI 0.04, 0.11) to β = 0.29 (95%CI 0.27, 0.32) in childhood and adolescence, and RR = 1.04 (95%CI 1.01, 1.06) to RR = 1.11 (95%CI 1.07, 1.15) in adulthood. There was evidence for accumulating effects across development, ranging from β = 0.15 (95%CI 0.11, 0.18) to β = 0.23 (95%CI 0.16, 0.29) depending on cohort. Our findings are consistent with the interpretation that parents pass on advantages to offspring not only via direct genetic transmission or purely environmental paths, but also via genetic associations with parental investment from conception to wealth inheritance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmin Wertz & Terrie E. Moffitt & Louise Arseneault & J. C. Barnes & Michel Boivin & David L. Corcoran & Andrea Danese & Robert J. Hancox & HonaLee Harrington & Renate M. Houts & Stephanie Langevin &, 2023. "Genetic associations with parental investment from conception to wealth inheritance in six cohorts," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 1388-1401, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01618-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01618-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01618-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-023-01618-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Doepke & Giuseppe Sorrenti & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2019. "The Economics of Parenting," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 55-84, August.
    2. Adrian Adermon & Mikael Lindahl & Daniel Waldenström, 2018. "Intergenerational Wealth Mobility and the Role of Inheritance: Evidence from Multiple Generations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 482-513, July.
    3. Frank Dudbridge, 2013. "Power and Predictive Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Melinda C. Mills & Felix C. Tropf & David M. Brazel & Natalie Zuydam & Ahmad Vaez & Tune H. Pers & Harold Snieder & John R. B. Perry & Ken K. Ong & Marcel Hoed & Nicola Barban & Felix R. Day, 2021. "Identification of 371 genetic variants for age at first sex and birth linked to externalising behaviour," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1717-1730, December.
    5. Melinda C. Mills & Felix C. Tropf & David M. Brazel & Natalie Zuydam & Ahmad Vaez & Tune H. Pers & Harold Snieder & John R. B. Perry & Ken K. Ong & Marcel Hoed & Nicola Barban & Felix R. Day, 2021. "Publisher Correction: Identification of 371 genetic variants for age at first sex and birth linked to externalising behavior," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 1111-1111, August.
    6. L. Duncan & H. Shen & B. Gelaye & J. Meijsen & K. Ressler & M. Feldman & R. Peterson & B. Domingue, 2019. "Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trejo, Sam, 2020. "Exploring Genetic Influences on Birth Weight," SocArXiv 7j59q, Center for Open Science.
    2. Aoxing Liu & Evelina T. Akimova & Xuejie Ding & Sakari Jukarainen & Pekka Vartiainen & Tuomo Kiiskinen & Sara Koskelainen & Aki S. Havulinna & Mika Gissler & Stefano Lombardi & Tove Fall & Melinda C. , 2024. "Evidence from Finland and Sweden on the relationship between early-life diseases and lifetime childlessness in men and women," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 276-287, February.
    3. Zhang, Yan & Fletcher, Jason & Lu, Qiongshi & Song, Jie, 2023. "Gender differences in the association between parity and cognitive function: Evidence from the UK biobank," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    4. Pereira, Rita & Biroli, Pietro & von hinke, stephanie & Van Kippersluis, Hans & Galama, Titus & Rietveld, Niels & Thom, Kevin, 2022. "Gene-Environment Interplay in the Social Sciences," OSF Preprints d96z3, Center for Open Science.
    5. Korom, Philipp, 2016. "Inherited advantage: The importance of inheritance for private wealth accumulation in Europe," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Johannes Abeler & Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse, 2021. "Malleability of Preferences for Honesty," CESifo Working Paper Series 9033, CESifo.
    7. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    8. Simon Halphen Boserup & Wojciech Kopczuk & Claus Thustrup Kreiner, 2018. "Born with a Silver Spoon? Danish Evidence on Wealth Inequality in Childhood," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 514-544, July.
    9. Pedro Salas-Rojo & Juan Gabriel Rodríguez, 2022. "Inheritances and wealth inequality: a machine learning approach," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 27-51, March.
    10. Mathias Moser & Stefan Humer & Matthias Schnetzer, 2016. "Bequests and the accumulation of wealth in the Eurozone," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 149, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    11. Spencer Bastani & Daniel Waldenström, 2019. "Salience of Inherited Wealth and the Support for Inheritance Taxation," World Inequality Lab Working Papers hal-02877003, HAL.
    12. Ekaterina Hertog & Muzhi Zhou, 2021. "Japanese adolescents' time use: The role of household income and parental education," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(9), pages 225-238.
    13. Theine, Hendrik, 2019. "The media coverage of wealth and inheritance taxation in Germany," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 290, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    14. Mitchell, Brittany L. & Hansell, Narelle K. & McAloney, Kerrie & Martin, Nicholas G. & Wright, Margaret J. & Renteria, Miguel E. & Grasby, Katrina L., 2022. "Polygenic influences associated with adolescent cognitive skills," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Matthias Doepke & Giuseppe Sorrenti & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2019. "The Economics of Parenting," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 55-84, August.
    16. Elinder, Mikael & Erixson, Oscar & Waldenström, Daniel, 2018. "Inheritance and wealth inequality: Evidence from population registers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 17-30.
    17. Brenøe, Anne Ardila & Epper, Thomas, 2022. "Parenting values and the intergenerational transmission of time preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. N. Meltem Daysal & Michael F. Lovenheim & David N. Wasser, 2023. "The Intergenerational Transmission of Housing Wealth," NBER Working Papers 31669, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Jun Wang & Qihui Chen & Gang Chen & Yingxiang Li & Guoshu Kong & Chen Zhu, 2020. "What is creating the height premium? New evidence from a Mendelian randomization analysis in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Ana Bravo-Moreno, 2021. "The Intersection of Reproductive, Work-Life Balance and Early-Education and Care Policies: ‘Solo’ Mothers by Choice in the UK and Spain," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01618-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.