IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-63878-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Membrane-free redox flow battery with polymer electrolytes

Author

Listed:
  • Rajeev K. Gautam

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Xiao Wang

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Jianbing “Jimmy” Jiang

    (University of Cincinnati)

Abstract

Li metal-based nonaqueous batteries are valued for high voltage and energy density, but face challenges like Li instability, volatile electrolytes, and costly ion-exchange membranes. To address these, we develop a membrane-free battery employing an ion-immobilized polymer electrolyte as anolyte and organic solvent as catholyte. Two polymer electrolytes are created for Li negative electrode: solid polymer electrolyte of polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene and gel polymer electrolyte with polypropylene carbonate. While the solid-state electrolyte offers an initial approach, it is associated with slower Li+ ions diffusion and lower ionic conductivity. The gel polymer electrolyte, specifically developed to overcome these limitations, improves Li+ diffusion, mass transport, and energy density. These anolytes are coupled with 2,4,6-tri-(1-cyclohexyloxy-4-imino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine)−1,3,5-triazine in organic solvents (fluoroethylene carbonate and tetra (ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether) as catholytes, forming membrane-free batteries with solid polymer electrolyte and gel polymer electrolyte. Here we show that, at 0.5 M 2,4,6-tri-(1-cyclohexyloxy-4-imino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine)−1,3,5-triazine, the battery with solid polymer electrolyte exhibits capacity retentions of 90.7% and 81.78% and Coulombic efficiencies of 95.4% and 96.7% under static and flow conditions, respectively. The battery with gel polymer electrolyte exhibits capacity retentions of 96.8% and 78.8% and Coulombic efficiencies of 97.8% and 98.4%. These results highlight the polymer electrolyte strategy’s potential for enhancing battery performance and safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajeev K. Gautam & Xiao Wang & Jianbing “Jimmy” Jiang, 2025. "Membrane-free redox flow battery with polymer electrolytes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63878-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63878-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63878-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-63878-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajeev K. Gautam & Xiao Wang & Amir Lashgari & Soumalya Sinha & Jack McGrath & Rabin Siwakoti & Jianbing “Jimmy” Jiang, 2023. "Development of high-voltage and high-energy membrane-free nonaqueous lithium-based organic redox flow batteries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jun Yin & Annalisa Molini & Amilcare Porporato, 2020. "Impacts of solar intermittency on future photovoltaic reliability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Alotto, Piergiorgio & Guarnieri, Massimo & Moro, Federico, 2014. "Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 325-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yifei & Luo, Shijing & Kwok, Holly Y.H. & Pan, Wending & Zhang, Yingguang & Zhao, Xiaolong & Leung, Dennis Y.C., 2021. "Microfluidic fuel cells with different types of fuels: A prospective review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Bhattarai, Arjun & Wai, Nyunt & Schweiss, Rüdiger & Whitehead, Adam & Scherer, Günther G. & Ghimire, Purna C. & Lim, Tuti M. & Hng, Huey Hoon, 2019. "Vanadium redox flow battery with slotted porous electrodes and automatic rebalancing demonstrated on a 1 kW system level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 437-443.
    3. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    4. Ivan Kuzmin & Alexey Loskutov & Evgeny Osetrov & Andrey Kurkin, 2022. "Source for Autonomous Power Supply System Based on Flow Battery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Yoon, Sang Jun & Kim, Sangwon & Kim, Dong Kyu, 2019. "Optimization of local porosity in the electrode as an advanced channel for all-vanadium redox flow battery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 26-35.
    6. Marco Vocciante & Vincenzo G. Dovì & Sergio Ferro, 2021. "Sustainability in ElectroKinetic Remediation Processes: A Critical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Subburaj, Anitha S. & Pushpakaran, Bejoy N. & Bayne, Stephen B., 2015. "Overview of grid connected renewable energy based battery projects in USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 219-234.
    8. Eapen, Deepa Elizabeth & Suresh, Resmi & Patil, Sairaj & Rengaswamy, Raghunathan, 2021. "A systems engineering perspective on electrochemical energy technologies and a framework for application driven choice of technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Ghanim, Marrwa S. & Farhan, Ammar A., 2023. "Projected patterns of climate change impact on photovoltaic energy potential: A case study of Iraq," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 338-346.
    10. Abhnil Amtesh Prasad & Merlinde Kay, 2021. "Prediction of Solar Power Using Near-Real Time Satellite Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Kim, Jungmyung & Park, Heesung, 2019. "Electrokinetic parameters of a vanadium redox flow battery with varying temperature and electrolyte flow rate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 284-291.
    12. Dehghani-Sanij, A.R. & Tharumalingam, E. & Dusseault, M.B. & Fraser, R., 2019. "Study of energy storage systems and environmental challenges of batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 192-208.
    13. Saini, Raj Kumar & Saini, Devender Kumar & Gupta, Rajeev & Verma, Piush & Thakur, Robin & Kumar, Sushil & wassouf, Ali, 2023. "Technological development in solar dryers from 2016 to 2021-A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Roberto Benato & Sebastian Dambone Sessa & Maura Musio & Francesco Palone & Rosario Maria Polito, 2018. "Italian Experience on Electrical Storage Ageing for Primary Frequency Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Spanos, Constantine & Turney, Damon E. & Fthenakis, Vasilis, 2015. "Life-cycle analysis of flow-assisted nickel zinc-, manganese dioxide-, and valve-regulated lead-acid batteries designed for demand-charge reduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 478-494.
    16. Chen, Qi & Kuang, Zhonghong & Liu, Xiaohua & Zhang, Tao, 2022. "Energy storage to solve the diurnal, weekly, and seasonal mismatch and achieve zero-carbon electricity consumption in buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    17. Cruz, Marco R.M. & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Santos, Sérgio F. & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A comprehensive survey of flexibility options for supporting the low-carbon energy future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 338-353.
    18. Lai, Chun Sing & McCulloch, Malcolm D., 2017. "Levelized cost of electricity for solar photovoltaic and electrical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 191-203.
    19. Kondziella, Hendrik & Bruckner, Thomas, 2016. "Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 10-22.
    20. Sinha, Avik, 2017. "Inequality of renewable energy generation across OECD countries: A note," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 9-14.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63878-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.