IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-39242-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cell facilitation promotes growth and survival under drug pressure in breast cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Rena Emond

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Jason I. Griffiths

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Vince Kornél Grolmusz

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Aritro Nath

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Jinfeng Chen

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Eric F. Medina

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Rachel S. Sousa

    (University of Utah
    University of California)

  • Timothy Synold

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

  • Frederick R. Adler

    (University of Utah
    University of Utah)

  • Andrea H. Bild

    (Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center)

Abstract

The interplay of positive and negative interactions between drug-sensitive and resistant cells influences the effectiveness of treatment in heterogeneous cancer cell populations. Here, we study interactions between estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell lineages that are sensitive and resistant to ribociclib-induced cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibition. In mono- and coculture, we find that sensitive cells grow and compete more effectively in the absence of treatment. During treatment with ribociclib, sensitive cells survive and proliferate better when grown together with resistant cells than when grown in monoculture, termed facilitation in ecology. Molecular, protein, and genomic analyses show that resistant cells increase metabolism and production of estradiol, a highly active estrogen metabolite, and increase estrogen signaling in sensitive cells to promote facilitation in coculture. Adding estradiol in monoculture provides sensitive cells with increased resistance to therapy and cancels facilitation in coculture. Under partial inhibition of estrogen signaling through low-dose endocrine therapy, estradiol supplied by resistant cells facilitates sensitive cell growth. However, a more complete blockade of estrogen signaling, through higher-dose endocrine therapy, diminished the facilitative growth of sensitive cells. Mathematical modeling quantifies the strength of competition and facilitation during CDK4/6 inhibition and predicts that blocking facilitation has the potential to control both resistant and sensitive cancer cell populations and inhibit the emergence of a refractory population during cell cycle therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rena Emond & Jason I. Griffiths & Vince Kornél Grolmusz & Aritro Nath & Jinfeng Chen & Eric F. Medina & Rachel S. Sousa & Timothy Synold & Frederick R. Adler & Andrea H. Bild, 2023. "Cell facilitation promotes growth and survival under drug pressure in breast cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-39242-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39242-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39242-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-39242-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qunyan Yu & Yan Geng & Piotr Sicinski, 2001. "Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 ablation," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6841), pages 1017-1021, June.
    2. Carpenter, Bob & Gelman, Andrew & Hoffman, Matthew D. & Lee, Daniel & Goodrich, Ben & Betancourt, Michael & Brubaker, Marcus & Guo, Jiqiang & Li, Peter & Riddell, Allen, 2017. "Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i01).
    3. Allison S. Cleary & Travis L. Leonard & Shelley A. Gestl & Edward J. Gunther, 2014. "Tumour cell heterogeneity maintained by cooperating subclones in Wnt-driven mammary cancers," Nature, Nature, vol. 508(7494), pages 113-117, April.
    4. Suha Naffar-Abu Amara & Hendrik J. Kuiken & Laura M. Selfors & Timothy Butler & Marco L. Leung & Cheuk T. Leung & Elaine P. Kuhn & Teodora Kolarova & Carina Hage & Kripa Ganesh & Richard Panayiotou & , 2020. "Transient commensal clonal interactions can drive tumor metastasis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Samuel W. Brady & Jasmine A. McQuerry & Yi Qiao & Stephen R. Piccolo & Gajendra Shrestha & David F. Jenkins & Ryan M. Layer & Brent S. Pedersen & Ryan H. Miller & Amanda Esch & Sara R. Selitsky & Joel, 2017. "Combating subclonal evolution of resistant cancer phenotypes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis,David C. & Kubinec ,Robert, 2022. "Beyond Political Connections : A Measurement Model Approach to Estimating Firm-levelPolitical Influence in 41 Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10119, The World Bank.
    2. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    3. Torsten Heinrich & Jangho Yang & Shuanping Dai, 2020. "Growth, development, and structural change at the firm-level: The example of the PR China," Papers 2012.14503, arXiv.org.
    4. Xin Xu & Yang Lu & Yupeng Zhou & Zhiguo Fu & Yanjie Fu & Minghao Yin, 2021. "An Information-Explainable Random Walk Based Unsupervised Network Representation Learning Framework on Node Classification Tasks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Xiaoyue Xi & Simon E. F. Spencer & Matthew Hall & M. Kate Grabowski & Joseph Kagaayi & Oliver Ratmann & Rakai Health Sciences Program and PANGEA‐HIV, 2022. "Inferring the sources of HIV infection in Africa from deep‐sequence data with semi‐parametric Bayesian Poisson flow models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 517-540, June.
    6. Joseph B. Bak-Coleman & Ian Kennedy & Morgan Wack & Andrew Beers & Joseph S. Schafer & Emma S. Spiro & Kate Starbird & Jevin D. West, 2022. "Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1372-1380, October.
    7. David M. Phillippo & Sofia Dias & A. E. Ades & Mark Belger & Alan Brnabic & Alexander Schacht & Daniel Saure & Zbigniew Kadziola & Nicky J. Welton, 2020. "Multilevel network meta‐regression for population‐adjusted treatment comparisons," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1189-1210, June.
    8. Burbano, Vanessa & Padilla, Nicolas & Meier, Stephan, 2020. "Gender Differences in Preferences for Meaning at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 13053, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Robert Kubinec & Haillie Na‐Kyung Lee & Andrey Tomashevskiy, 2021. "Politically connected companies are less likely to shutdown due to COVID‐19 restrictions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2155-2169, September.
    10. Barrington-Leigh, C.P., 2024. "The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Salvatore Nunnari & Massimiliano Pozzi, 2022. "Meta-Analysis of Inequality Aversion Estimates," CESifo Working Paper Series 9851, CESifo.
    12. Andreas Kryger Jensen & Claus Thorn Ekstrøm, 2021. "Quantifying the trendiness of trends," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 98-121, January.
    13. Lauderdale, Benjamin E. & Bailey, Delia & Blumenau, Jack & Rivers, Douglas, 2020. "Model-based pre-election polling for national and sub-national outcomes in the US and UK," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 399-413.
    14. Tamara Broderick & Ryan Giordano & Rachael Meager, 2020. "An Automatic Finite-Sample Robustness Metric: When Can Dropping a Little Data Make a Big Difference?," Papers 2011.14999, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    15. Kenneth F. Kellner & Arielle W. Parsons & Roland Kays & Joshua J. Millspaugh & Christopher T. Rota, 2022. "A Two-Species Occupancy Model with a Continuous-Time Detection Process Reveals Spatial and Temporal Interactions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 321-338, June.
    16. Owen G. Ward & Jing Wu & Tian Zheng & Anna L. Smith & James P. Curley, 2022. "Network Hawkes process models for exploring latent hierarchy in social animal interactions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1402-1426, November.
    17. Radka Jersakova & James Lomax & James Hetherington & Brieuc Lehmann & George Nicholson & Mark Briers & Chris Holmes, 2022. "Bayesian imputation of COVID‐19 positive test counts for nowcasting under reporting lag," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 834-860, August.
    18. Rania El-Botty & Ludivine Morriset & Elodie Montaudon & Zakia Tariq & Anne Schnitzler & Marina Bacci & Nicla Lorito & Laura Sourd & Léa Huguet & Ahmed Dahmani & Pierre Painsec & Heloise Derrien & Soph, 2023. "Oxidative phosphorylation is a metabolic vulnerability of endocrine therapy and palbociclib resistant metastatic breast cancers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Abdul Karim Obeid & Peter D Bruza & Peter Wittek, 2019. "Evaluating probabilistic programming languages for simulating quantum correlations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-37, January.
    20. Tourani-Farani, Fahimeh & Kazemi, Iraj, 2022. "Transformed mixed-effects modeling of correlated bounded and positive data with a novel multivariate generalized Johnson distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-39242-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.