IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v15y2025i7d10.1038_s41558-025-02361-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the black box of fair national emissions targets

Author

Listed:
  • Mark M. Dekker

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
    Utrecht Universiteit)

  • Andries F. Hof

    (Utrecht Universiteit
    National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM))

  • Yann Robiou Pont

    (Utrecht Universiteit)

  • Nicole Berg

    (Utrecht Universiteit
    Socio-Economic Energy Transition Studies (SES))

  • Vassilis Daioglou

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
    Utrecht Universiteit)

  • Michel Elzen

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Rik Heerden

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)

  • Elena Hooijschuur

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)

  • Isabela Schmidt Tagomori

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)

  • Chantal Würschinger

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)

  • Detlef P. Vuuren

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
    Utrecht Universiteit)

Abstract

Current national emissions targets fall short of the Paris Agreement goals, prompting the need for equitable ways to close this gap. Fair emissions allowances rely on effort-sharing formulas based on fairness principles, yielding diverse outcomes. These variations, shaped by normative decisions, complicate policymaking and legal assessments of climate targets. Here we provide up-to-date numbers, comprehensively accounting for three dimensions—physical and social uncertainties, global strategies and equity—and the relative impact of them on each country’s emissions allowance. In the short run, normative considerations substantially impact fair emissions allowances—directing current discussions to this debate—while global discussions on temperature targets and non-CO2 emissions take over in the long run. We identify many countries with insufficient nationally determined contributions in light of fairness and discuss implications for increased domestic mitigation and financing emissions reductions abroad—yielding a total international finance flux of $US0.5–7.4 trillion in 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark M. Dekker & Andries F. Hof & Yann Robiou Pont & Nicole Berg & Vassilis Daioglou & Michel Elzen & Rik Heerden & Elena Hooijschuur & Isabela Schmidt Tagomori & Chantal Würschinger & Detlef P. Vuure, 2025. "Navigating the black box of fair national emissions targets," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 15(7), pages 752-759, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:15:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1038_s41558-025-02361-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-025-02361-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-025-02361-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-025-02361-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Bohringer & Heinz Welsch, 2006. "Burden sharing in a greenhouse: egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 981-996.
    2. Michel Elzen & Jos Olivier & Niklas Höhne & Greet Janssens-Maenhout, 2013. "Countries’ contributions to climate change: effect of accounting for all greenhouse gases, recent trends, basic needs and technological progress," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 397-412, November.
    3. Marcel M. Berk & Michel G.J. den Elzen, 2001. "Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(4), pages 465-480, December.
    4. Paul Baer, 2013. "The greenhouse development rights framework for global burden sharing: reflection on principles and prospects," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 61-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    2. Andries Hof & Michel Elzen & Detlef Vuuren, 2009. "Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes: what can we learn from model studies?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 39-62, February.
    3. van Ruijven, Bas J. & Weitzel, Matthias & den Elzen, Michel G.J. & Hof, Andries F. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Peterson, Sonja & Narita, Daiju, 2012. "Emission allowances and mitigation costs of China and India resulting from different effort-sharing approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 116-134.
    4. Wu, Yinyin & Wang, Ping & Liu, Xin & Chen, Jiandong & Song, Malin, 2020. "Analysis of regional carbon allocation and carbon trading based on net primary productivity in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Gevrek, Z.Eylem & Uyduranoglu, Ayse, 2015. "Public preferences for carbon tax attributes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 186-197.
    6. Persson, Tobias A. & Azar, Christian & Lindgren, Kristian, 2006. "Allocation of CO2 emission permits--Economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(14), pages 1889-1899, September.
    7. Wachsmuth, Jakob & Denishchenkova, Alexandra & Fekete, Hanna & Parra, Paola & Schaeffer, Michiel & Ancygier, Andrzej & Sferra, Fabio, 2019. "Fairness- and cost-effectiveness-based approaches to effort-sharing under the Paris agreement," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S04/2019, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    8. Christopher W. Callahan & Justin S. Mankin, 2022. "National attribution of historical climate damages," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Tao, Xuezong & Zhu, Lichao, 2024. "Drivers of transportation CO2 emissions and their changing patterns: Empirical results from 18 countries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Marco R. Barassi & Nicola Spagnolo & Yuqian Zhao, 2018. "Fractional Integration Versus Structural Change: Testing the Convergence of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(4), pages 923-968, December.
    11. Kuntsi-Reunanen, E., 2007. "A comparison of Latin American energy-related CO2 emissions from 1970 to 2001," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 586-596, January.
    12. Andries Hof & Michel Elzen & Detlef Vuuren, 2010. "Including adaptation costs and climate change damages in evaluating post-2012 burden-sharing regimes," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 19-40, January.
    13. Lee, Chia-Yen & Wang, Ke, 2019. "Nash marginal abatement cost estimation of air pollutant emissions using the stochastic semi-nonparametric frontier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 390-400.
    14. Kalia Ruth Barkai & Harald Winkler, 2025. "Developing a framework for assessing equity in national contributions to the global goal on adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-106, March.
    15. Christoph Böhringer & Nicholas Rivers & Thomas Rutherford & Randall Wigle, 2015. "Sharing the burden for climate change mitigation in the Canadian federation," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 1350-1380, November.
    16. R. Dean Hardy & Bryan L. Nuse, 2016. "Global sea-level rise: weighing country responsibility and risk," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 333-345, August.
    17. Yenny Naranjo Tuesta & Cristina Crespo Soler & Vicente Ripoll Feliu, 2020. "The Influence of Carbon Management on the Financial Performance of European Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Bang, Guri & Froyn, Camilla Bretteville & Hovi, Jon & Menz, Fredric C., 2007. "The United States and international climate cooperation: International "pull" versus domestic "push"," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1282-1291, February.
    19. Auriane Meilland & Yann Kervinio & Aurélie Méjean, 2025. "International Climate Justice: What the People Think," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(1), pages 225-247, January.
    20. Charlier, Dorothée & Pommeret, Aude & Ricci, Francesco, 2024. "A rationale for the Right-to-Development climate policy stance?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:15:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1038_s41558-025-02361-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.