IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

L'indice OECD di rigidità nel mercato del lavoro: una nota

  • Del Conte Maurizio
  • Devillanova Carlo
  • Morelli Silvia

Summary: The paper analyses the method adopted by the index of employment protection systems developed in 1999 by the OECD, and discusses its reliability and shortcomings, in particular with regards to Italy. The paper highlights a series of methodological problems arising from the aggregation of the respective indicators, and casts doubt on the possibility of developing an aggregate index generated as sum of partial indexes. The paper identifies several errors and imprecision in the development of the index, in the light of an accurate reading of legal data. The greater inaccuracies regard the index of rigidity attributed to legal provisions applicable to "employment termination indemnities", "individual dismissal", "redundancy lay off" and "temporary redundancy benefits". Re-examination of legal data has led to a substantial downgrading of Italy's labour market rigidity index. Yet, the most significant finding is the extreme volatility of the index, according to diverse interpretations of the legal data. This observation is fraught with consequences regarding proper application of information provided by the rigidity index.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica - Journal of Economic Policy (PEJEP).

Volume (Year): (2004)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 335-356

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/18612:y:2004:i:3:p:335-356
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/18612:y:2004:i:3:p:335-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.