IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jpag88/v10y2020i1p110-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis on Shariah Governance in Malaysia: SGF 2010, IFSA 2013 and SGPD 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin
  • Mustafa Mohd Hanefah
  • Zurina Shafii
  • Supiah Salleh
  • Nurazalia Zakaria

Abstract

The main focus of shariah governance for an organization is to ensure that it is comply with shariah laws and regulations. Under Islamic finance industry, shariah governance is being given attention due to rapid growth of this industry in the world. For Malaysia, the authority through Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) have taken a proactive role by introducing shariah governance guidelines including the Shariah Governance Framework (SGF) 2010, the Islamic Financial Services Act (IFSA) 2013 and the latest is the Shariah Governance Policy Document (SGPD) 2019. These shariah governance guidelines are supposed to support the development of shariah governance practices especially by Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs) in Malaysia. However, there is limited to none study conducted to compare these guidelines. These shariah governance guidelines is necessary to be compared in order to find out whether these guidelines are complemented each other and to identify any differences among these guidelines. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare between these shariah governance guidelines. Based on the analysis, it has been found that SGPD 2019 is the most comprehensive covers on shariah governance as compared to IFSA 2013 and SGF 2010. However, these three guidelines still not become comprehensive enough, as there is still limited to none discussion on the definition and objectives of shariah governance itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin & Mustafa Mohd Hanefah & Zurina Shafii & Supiah Salleh & Nurazalia Zakaria, 2020. "Comparative Analysis on Shariah Governance in Malaysia: SGF 2010, IFSA 2013 and SGPD 2019," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 110131-1101, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:jpag88:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:110-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag/article/download/16157/12760
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag/article/view/16157
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samy Nathan Garas & Chris Pierce, 2010. "Shari'asupervision of Islamic financial institutions," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 386-407, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cedrix Ngandop Djeutcheu, 2019. "Ownership Structure and Islamic Banks Performance: An Empirical and Multiregional Tests Before, During and after the Last Global Financial Crisis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 202-218.
    2. Shakir Ullah & Ian A. Harwood & Dima Jamali, 2018. "‘Fatwa Repositioning’: The Hidden Struggle for Shari’a Compliance Within Islamic Financial Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(4), pages 895-917, June.
    3. Al Mannai, Muna & Ahmed, Habib, 2019. "Exploring the workings of Shari’ah supervisory board in Islamic finance: A perspective of Shari’ah scholars from GCC," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 97-108.
    4. Nurfarahin M. Haridan & Ahmad F. S. Hassan & Yusuf Karbhari, 2018. "Governance, religious assurance and Islamic banks: Do Shariah boards effectively serve?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 1015-1043, December.
    5. Zulkufly Ramly & Nurusysyifa Nordin, 2018. "Sharia Supervision Board, Board Independence, Risk Committee and Risk-taking of Islamic Banks in Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 290-300.
    6. Samy Garas & Abiot Tessema & Kienpin Tee, 2017. "The impact of Islamic Financial Services Board Standard No. 3 on corporate governance of listed firms in Kuwait," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(3), pages 251-263, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jpag88:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:110-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.