IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijld88/v6y2016i3p168-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees Perception on Performance Appraisal System in a public limited company in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Hameed Khan

Abstract

The Performance Appraisal system is now a common phenomenon in Pakistan. It is a major tool for most of the organizations to evaluate various aspects of their employees. Majority of the organization has implemented this process and is a regular feature for evaluation of their staff. Ample literature is available which has discussed the performance appraisal process at length targeting various dimensions of it. Although in the last few decades many studies are done and sufficient ?international literature on performance appraisal? is available (Landy and Farr, 1980),? however very? limited research is done in Pakistan in this area .To analyses the perception of employees regarding the performance appraisal system implementation a public limited company in energy sector is selected .The company which previously used to undertake employees evaluation through the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) system introduced Performance appraisal system in 2001 in order to comply with the new vision of the company.In order to analyze the perception of employees regarding the new system and its implementation, 33 item questionnaires consist of 4 independent and one dependent variables was distributed among 150 management position employees? ?who were acquainted with the Performance appraisal procedure. The questionnaire has 4 independent variable which are Procedural justice, Goal setting, feedback and Pay for performance and one dependent variable, the employee perception towards Performance appraisal process. ?The instrument used was a likert scale questionnaire with the scale of 1 for strongly disagree to 5 for strongly agree. Factor analysis and regression analysis was done through SPSS19 .The result shows the process was implemented as per organization guidelines to the overall satisfaction of employees. There are however some areas of improvement which have been noted in the conclusion. The results and outcome are in line with international published data.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Hameed Khan, 2016. "Employees Perception on Performance Appraisal System in a public limited company in Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(3), pages 168-200, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:6:y:2016:i:3:p:168-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/download/10039/8241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/view/10039
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prince, J. Bruce & Lawler, Edward E., 1986. "Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 357-375, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabbir Hassan Chowdhury & Sanjoy Kumar Roy & Murshedul Arafin & Sifat Siddiquee, 2019. "Green HR Practices and Its Impact on Employee Work Satisfaction – A Case Study on IBBL, Bangladesh," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 3(3), pages 129-138, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Barczak & Izabela Dembińska & Tomasz Rostkowski & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Dorota Rozmus, 2021. "Structure of Remuneration as Assessed by Employees of the Energy Sector—Multivariate Correspondence Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:6:y:2016:i:3:p:168-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.