IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijch88/v12y2025i1p71.html

Kohbar Painting an Important Cultural Heritage of Mithila, Nepal: Coping with Natural Disaster

Author

Listed:
  • Lok Nath Dulal
  • Pashupati Nyaupane
  • Sapna Singh

Abstract

Kohbar painting is a prominent intangible cultural heritage of the Mithila region of Nepal and its resilience in the face of natural disasters. Traditionally associated with weddings and fertility rituals, Kohbar paintings are richest in symbolic motifs and hold deep cultural and spiritual significance. However, Mithila’s geographical vulnerability to floods, earthquakes, and other natural disasters poses a threat to the preservation and continuity of this art form. This study explores how Kohbar painting not only endures but adapts to these challenges, examining the role it plays in post-disaster recovery and cultural resilience. Using a qualitative ethnographic approach, the research draws on interviews, field observations, and document analysis to assess the impact of natural disasters on Kohbar artists and their communities. Findings reveal that while floods and earthquakes have disrupted the traditional practice of painting on walls, many artists have adapted by using alternative mediums such as canvas and paper. These adaptive strategies enable the preservation of cultural identity and allow communities to maintain a sense of continuity and hope during recovery. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on intangible cultural heritage and disaster resilience by focusing on the unique case of Kohbar painting. The findings suggest that Kohbar art serves not only as a means of cultural expression but also as a psychological and emotional coping mechanism for communities recovering from disaster. This is based on primary data and secondary information. The primary data have been obtained from the field whereas the secondary information has generated through the literature review. It is based on qualitative data and qualitative research design.

Suggested Citation

  • Lok Nath Dulal & Pashupati Nyaupane & Sapna Singh, 2025. "Kohbar Painting an Important Cultural Heritage of Mithila, Nepal: Coping with Natural Disaster," International Journal of Culture and History, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 1-71, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijch88:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijch/article/download/22870/17567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijch/article/view/22870
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy B. Bell & Wayne R. Landsman & Douglas A. Shackelford, 2001. "Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 35-43, June.
    2. Lok Nath Dulal & Raju K. C. & Ankita Singh, 2023. "Aripana Art of Mithila Culture in Nepal: A Study of Symbols and Significance," International Journal of Culture and History, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 118-118, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atasi Basu & Randal Elder & Mohamed Onsi, 2012. "Reported earnings, auditor's opinion, and compensation: theory and evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 29-48, March.
    2. Gopal Krishnan & Marietta Peytcheva, 2019. "The Risk of Fraud in Family Firms: Assessments of External Auditors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 261-278, June.
    3. Chen, Xiao & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Liu, Leo Jiahe, 2025. "Audit implications of major customer diversity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    4. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    5. Wang, Jiaxin & Zhao, Mu & Huang, Xiang & Song, Zilong & Sun, Di, 2024. "Supply chain diffusion mechanisms for AI applications: A perspective on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Lin & Ma, Qianqun & Wu, Chong, 2024. "The impact of financial risk on boilerplate of key audit matters: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    7. Liwei Shan & Albert Tsang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2024. "Transporting Audit Quality Across Countries: Returnee CEOs and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 845-874, July.
    8. Jinghui Sun & Liuchuang Li & Baolei Qi, 2022. "Financial statement comparability and audit pricing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(5), pages 4631-4661, December.
    9. Persakis, Anthony & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2016. "Audit quality, investor protection and earnings management during the financial crisis of 2008: An international perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 73-101.
    10. Lai, Kam-Wah, 2019. "Audit report lag, audit fees, and audit quality following an audit firm merger: Evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Lennox, Clive & Li, Bing, 2012. "The consequences of protecting audit partners’ personal assets from the threat of liability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 154-173.
    12. Dafydd Mali & Hyoung‐joo Lim, 2021. "Do Relatively More Efficient Firms Demand Additional Audit Effort (Hours)?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(2), pages 108-127, June.
    13. Peecher, Mark E. & Schwartz, Rachel & Solomon, Ira, 2007. "It's all about audit quality: Perspectives on strategic-systems auditing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 463-485.
    14. Rajib Doogar & Padmakumar Sivadasan & Ira Solomon, 2015. "Audit fee residuals: Costs or rents?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1247-1286, December.
    15. Ting‐Chiao Huang & Yi‐Hung Lin & Daniel Chai & Stephanie Hairston, 2025. "Are auditors insulated to positive client news? Evidence from audit fees and going‐concern opinions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(3), pages 2339-2386, September.
    16. Jingyu Yang & Hai Wu & Yangxin Yu, 2021. "Distracted institutional investors and audit risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3855-3881, September.
    17. Monika Causholli & W. Robert Knechel, 2012. "Lending relationships, auditor quality and debt costs," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 27(6), pages 550-572, June.
    18. Duellman, Scott & Hurwitz, Helen & Sun, Yan, 2015. "Managerial overconfidence and audit fees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 148-165.
    19. repec:tsa:wpaper:0056acc is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ghosh, Aloke(Al) & Tang, Charles Y., 2015. "Assessing financial reporting quality of family firms: The auditors׳ perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 95-116.
    21. Chen, Yangyang & Ge, Rui & Zolotoy, Leon, 2017. "Do corporate pension plans affect audit pricing?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 322-337.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijch88:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijch.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.