IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mje/mjejnl/v16y2020i455-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A General Model Based on the DuPont System of Financial Analysis for Identification, Analysis and Solution of a Potential Crisis in a Business

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Kasik
  • Petr Snapka

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to create a general model using the data commonly available in the managerial accounting system for the signalization of a possible potential crisis. The critical level of the input variables influencing the return of equity (ROE) and return on sales (ROS) was theoretically determined based on the DuPont system of financial analysis. To determine actual amount of the input variables for the test of their critical amount in a real company, we considered their average amount based on a simple arithmetic mean. For the real analysis in a potentially threatened company, we considered one month as a time unit for the time interval in a range of 14 months. We determined the average actual amounts of the input variables using confidence intervals. Because of the relatively small sample, we used Student's t-distribution for the construction of confidence intervals of the input variables. An analytical model-based system approach based on analysis of the complex value chain was used. By the means of logical derivations and testing this analytical model-based system approach in a real company, we proved, that this model enables not only to determine the critical level of the input variables leading to a crisis in a business but also to calculate their new adjusted amount, which the business needs to reach so that a potential crisis can be solved.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Kasik & Petr Snapka, 2020. "A General Model Based on the DuPont System of Financial Analysis for Identification, Analysis and Solution of a Potential Crisis in a Business," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 16(4), pages 55-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:16:y:2020:i:4:55-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.mnje.com/mje/2020/v16-n04/mje_2020_v16-n04-a15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Wiengarten & Vikram Bhakoo & Cristina Gimenez, 2015. "The impact of host country regulatory quality on the value creation process in e-business supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 4963-4978, August.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12187 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Josef Kašík & Petr Šnapka, 2019. "The possibility of solving a potential crisis in a company by applying the measures of structurally multifunctional character," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 293-316.
    4. Christophe Roux-Dufort, 2007. "Is Crisis Management (only) a Management of exceptions?," Post-Print hal-02311783, HAL.
    5. Anouck Adrot & Jean-Luc Moriceau, 2013. "Introducing performativity to crisis management theory : an illustration from the 2003 French heat wave crisis response," Post-Print hal-01451075, HAL.
    6. Ivo Ph. Jansen & Sundaresh Ramnath & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2012. "A Diagnostic for Earnings Management Using Changes in Asset Turnover and Profit Margin," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 221-251, March.
    7. Milena Parent & David Deephouse, 2007. "A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Beata Szczecińska & Ludwik Wicki & Bożena Kusz, 2022. "Determinants of Return-on-Equity (ROE) of Biogas Plants Operating in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    2. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Päivi Myllykangas & Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2010. "Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 65-72, August.
    4. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    5. Hannah Charlotte Joos, 2019. "Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 3-37, February.
    6. Dariusz Sobotkiewicz, 2021. "Changes in the Strategies and Structures of Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations during the Covid 19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 723-736.
    7. AnnMarie Bennett & Breda Murphy, 2017. "The Tax Profession: Tax Avoidance and the Public Interest," Economics Department Working Paper Series n286-17.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    8. Augusto Felício, J. & Rodrigues, Ricardo & Patino-Alonso, Carmen & Felício, Teresa, 2022. "Allostasis and organizational excellence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-114.
    9. Evans Sakyi Boadu, 2024. "Evaluating Ghana’s Youth-Centered Food-Security Policies: A Collaborative Governance Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Weihua Yan & Na Xu & Rui Xue & Zhenghang Ye & Zhaoyang Wang & Dingmeng Ren, 2022. "Efforts Proposed by IOC to Alleviate Pressure on Olympic Games Hosts and Evidence from Beijing 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Robbin Derry, 2012. "Reclaiming Marginalized Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 253-264, December.
    12. Parent, Milena M., 2016. "Stakeholder perceptions on the democratic governance of major sports events," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 402-416.
    13. Elise Perrault, 2017. "A ‘Names-and-Faces Approach’ to Stakeholder Identification and Salience: A Matter of Status," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 25-38, November.
    14. Hsiu-Ying Kao, Grace & Wang, Stephen W. & Farquhar, Jillian Dawes, 2020. "Modeling Airline Crisis Management Capability: Brand attitude, brand credibility and intention," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Mathieu Djaballah & Christopher Hautbois & Michel Desbordes, 2015. "Non-mega sporting events’ social impacts: A sensemaking approach of local governments’ perceptions and strategies," Post-Print hal-03550805, HAL.
    16. David Carassus & Khaled Albouaini & Marie Caussimont, 2013. "Une analyse de l'Audit Expectation Gap dans le contexte français," Post-Print hal-02432110, HAL.
    17. Benjamin Lynch & Martha O'Hagan‐Luff, 2024. "Relative corporate social performance and cost of equity capital: International evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2882-2910, July.
    18. Ionescu Bogdan-Ștefan & Feleagă Liliana & Dumitraşcu Luminița-Mihaela, 2020. "Does the shareholder salience influence the corporate social responsibility of entities from energy sector?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 225-235, July.
    19. Lock, Daniel & Filo, Kevin & Kunkel, Thilo & Skinner, James, 2013. "Thinking about the same things differently: Examining perceptions of a non-profit community sport organisation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 438-450.
    20. Adele Santana, 2012. "Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 257-265, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:16:y:2020:i:4:55-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikola Draskovic Jelcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.mnje.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.