IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dinamikus árazás az elektronikus piactereken
[Dynamic pricing on electronic markets]

Author

Listed:
  • Szabó, Katalin
  • Kocsis, Éva

Abstract

Napjainkban az elektronikus piactereken rég elfelejtett alkudozási formák élednek újra, s megtörni látszik a vevők árdiktátumoknak való kiszolgáltatottsága. Csak néhány kattintás az egérrel, és bármelyik vevő áttekintheti a teljes piaci kínálatot. Így a mikroökonómiai tankönyvek szélső esetéből a mindennapok gyakorlatává válhat a tökéletes verseny, s néhány elektronikusan adható-vehető jószág piacán jelentősen eshetnek az árak. A 20. század utolsó évtizedéig stabilan fennálló „ármeghatározó” és „árelfogadó” szereposztás is megváltozik a tetszőleges számú vevő egyidejű bekapcsolódását lehetővé tevő elektronikus aukciókon. Mindezek ellenére a nagyvállalatok a virtuális térben is hamar rátalálnak azokra a megoldásokra, amelyekkel újra szegmentálhatják a piacokat, mérsékelhetik transzparenciáit, és ahelyett hogy ők versenyeznének a vevők kegyéért, inkább vevőiket versenyeztetik. Emellett olyan árazási szoftvereket telepítenek a hálóra, amelyek a bejelentkező vevők adataiból megbecsülik fizetési hajlandóságukat, s ezáltal lehetővé teszik a profitok „optimalizálását”. A szégyenlősen „jövedelemmenedzsmentnek” nevezett módszerrel elejét veszik annak, hogy olcsóbban adják termékeiket annál, mint amennyit a fogyasztó hajlandó adni értük. A szerzők a tömeges testre szabás kialakulófélben levő új termelési módjának kontextusába helyezve mutatják be a dinamikus árképzés - ma még kissé ellentmondásos - előretörését. Az árazásról csak egyet tudhatunk biztosan: a rögzített „költség ” ár dominanciája lassan véget ér.** Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: D4.

Suggested Citation

  • Szabó, Katalin & Kocsis, Éva, 2002. "Dinamikus árazás az elektronikus piactereken [Dynamic pricing on electronic markets]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 858-874.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=565
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurwicz, Leonid, 1973. "The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Csekő, Imre, 1996. "Választás és mechanizmus. Felületes ismerkedés az implementációelmélettel [Selection and mechanism. Getting superficially acquainted with the implementation theory]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 420-430.
    3. Bichler,Martin, 2001. "The Future of e-Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521003834, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Attar & Thomas Mariotti & François Salanié, 2020. "The Social Costs of Side Trading," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1608-1622.
    2. Robert Cooter & Winand Emons, 2004. "Truth-Bonding and Other Truth-Revealing Mechanisms for Courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 307-327, May.
    3. Warr, Peter G., 1974. "The Economics Of Shadow Pricing: Market Distortions And Public Investment," Staff Papers 14116, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Tian, Guoqiang, 2004. "On the Informational Requirements of Decentralized Pareto-Satisfactory Mechanisms in Economies with Increasing Returns," MPRA Paper 41226, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2006.
    5. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Sandorf, Erlend Dancke & Sobhani, Anae & Szép, Teodóra, 2021. "Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 28-44.
    6. Noel Castree & David J. Keeling & Jerald Podair & Michael Pryke & Duncan W. Scott & Paul Lambe & Robert McMaster & Michael Slivka, 2005. "Book Reviews," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1471-1484, July.
    7. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Attar, Andrea & Campioni, Eloisa & Mariotti, Thomas & Pavan, Alessandro, 2021. "Keeping the Agents in the Dark: Private Disclosures in Competing Mechanisms," TSE Working Papers 21-1227, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Dec 2023.
    9. Dalton, P.S. & Gonzalez Jimenez, V.H. & Noussair, C.N., 2015. "Paying with Self-Chosen Goals : Incentives and Gender Differences," Discussion Paper 2015-021, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Boettke, Peter J. & Candela, Rosolino A., 2023. "On the feasibility of technosocialism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 44-54.
    11. Jianfeng Zheng & Ziyou Gao & Dong Yang & Zhuo Sun, 2015. "Network Design and Capacity Exchange for Liner Alliances with Fixed and Variable Container Demands," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 886-899, November.
    12. Schnizler, Björn & Neumann, Dirk & Veit, Daniel & Napoletano, Mauro & Catalano, Michele & Gallegati, Mauro & Reinicke, Michael & Streitberger, Werner & Eymann, Torsten, 2005. "Environmental analysis for application layer networks," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 1, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    13. Luis Garicano & Luis Rayo, 2016. "Why Organizations Fail: Models and Cases," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(1), pages 137-192, March.
    14. Ad. J. W. van de Gevel & Charles N. Noussair, 2013. "The Nexus between Artificial Intelligence and Economics," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-33648-5, October.
    15. Bruno Strulovici, 2020. "Can Society Function Without Ethical Agents? An Informational Perspective," Papers 2003.05441, arXiv.org.
    16. Kangning Zheng & Zuopeng Zhang & Jeffrey Gauthier, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Blockchain-based intelligent contract for factoring business in supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 777-797, January.
    17. Mehrdad Vahabi, 1999. "From Walrasian General Equilibrium to Incomplete Contracts: Making Sense of Institutions," Post-Print halshs-03704424, HAL.
    18. Ledyard, John O., "undated". "Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research," Working Papers 861, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    19. Roger Myerson, 2009. "Fundamental theory of institutions: a lecture in honor of Leo Hurwicz," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 13(1), pages 59-75, April.
    20. Satoru Fujishige & Zaifu Yang, 2020. "A Universal Dynamic Auction for Unimodular Demand Types: An Efficient Auction Design for Various Kinds of Indivisible Commodities," Discussion Papers 20/08, Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.