Author
Abstract
The mobility tool landscape continues to evolve because of shared mobility services, the prospect of automated vehicles (AVs), teleworking, and unpredicted challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical that public and private sector actors understand how travel behavior changes due to these catalysts. A nationwide Canadian survey, called the Future Mobility in Canada Survey (FMCS), was designed to capture the complex decision-making processes of travel behavior changes and the adoption of new mobility tools by assessing individual preferences, affective motivations, and behavioral intentions. FMCS investigated four main areas: (1) respondents’ intentions to adopt AVs, (2) respondents’ use of shared forms of mobility services, (3) respondents’ recent experience with telework and their preferences towards it, and (4) respondents’ behavior across the COVID-19 pandemic for certain modes and telework. FMCS addressed these four areas by collecting responses from 5002 respondents between October and November 2021, across the five largest Canadian census metropolitan areas in terms of population (Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, and Calgary) and Hamilton, which ranked 9th largest in 2021. This paper presents an overview of FMCS, emphasizing novel aspects of the survey design and data collection process reporting response burden and rates, while the major focus of this paper is scrutinizing the steps taken to obtain respondents’ intentions to adopt various types of AVs including shared AVs, pooled AVs, private AVs, and automated shuttle buses. The insights are relevant for other survey-based studies and are applicable for researchers who investigate adoption of new mobility tools and consequent travel behavior changes.
Suggested Citation
Samira Hamiditehrani & Darren M. Scott & Matthias N. Sweet, 2025.
"Design of the “Future Mobility in Canada Survey” (FMCS) to assess the evolving mobility landscape in urban Canada with an emphasis on automated vehicles,"
Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2027-2074, October.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-024-10484-7
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-024-10484-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.