IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v52y2025i3d10.1007_s11116-023-10444-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GPS-based user-verified shipment survey method to supplement the commodity flow survey: survey design, platform, and case study

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyu Jing

    (Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Jinping Guan

    (Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Kyungsoo Jeong

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Linlin You

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Lynette Cheah

    (Singapore University of Technology and Design)

  • Fang Zhao

    (Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Centre)

  • Moshe Ben-Akiva

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Conventional shipment data collection methods are limited due to intense labor, and lack of details on shipment paths and stops. In this view, we develop an innovative shipment survey methodology using Future Mobility Sensing (FMS)—Freight to collect shipment data at path-based origin–destination level and minimize respondent burden. FMS—Freight is a freight data collection, processing, and visualization platform which leverages sensing technologies and machine learning algorithms to interpret sensing data into travel diaries. We customized the existing FMS—Freight to accommodate the shipment survey. Specifically, we refined the stop detection, mode detection, and activity inference algorithms, revamped user interfaces, and developed a shipment data analysis and visualization tool. This web-based survey first collects the establishment’s business information, outgoing shipment information, historical shipment logs, and then requests tracking shipments with GPS devices, supplemented by a shipment registration survey and verification of shipment travel diaries. For proof-of-concept, we conducted a pilot shipment survey. Six establishments participated in the pilot and we gathered verified GPS data from 57 shipment trips. The pilot demonstrated the effectiveness of the survey design and instrument. This shipment survey has three aspects of significance: (1) It supplements the Commodity Flow Survey and enhances the capabilities to capture freight flows by combining user-verified geolocation data and detailed shipment information; (2) Collected shipment data can fill the significant data gap in the freight planning and management sector; (3) For individual establishments, FMS-Freight enables managing shipments in real-time and provides insights to assist decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyu Jing & Jinping Guan & Kyungsoo Jeong & Linlin You & Lynette Cheah & Fang Zhao & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2025. "A GPS-based user-verified shipment survey method to supplement the commodity flow survey: survey design, platform, and case study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 923-954, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10444-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10444-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-023-10444-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-023-10444-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thoen, Sebastiaan & Tavasszy, Lóránt & de Bok, Michiel & Correia, Goncalo & van Duin, Ron, 2020. "Descriptive modeling of freight tour formation: A shipment-based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Danaf, Mazen & Atasoy, Bilge & de Azevedo, Carlos Lima & Ding-Mastera, Jing & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Cox, Nathaniel & Zhao, Fang & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2019. "Context-aware stated preferences with smartphone-based travel surveys," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 35-50.
    3. Megersa Abate & Inge Vierth & Rune Karlsson & Gerard Jong & Jaap Baak, 2019. "A disaggregate stochastic freight transport model for Sweden," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 671-696, June.
    4. Sakai, Takanori & Romano Alho, André & Bhavathrathan, B.K. & Chiara, Giacomo Dalla & Gopalakrishnan, Raja & Jing, Peiyu & Hyodo, Tetsuro & Cheah, Lynette & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "SimMobility Freight: An agent-based urban freight simulator for evaluating logistics solutions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Zgheib, Najib & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Kaysi, Isam, 2020. "Modeling demand for ridesourcing as feeder for high capacity mass transit systems with an application to the planned Beirut BRT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 70-91.
    3. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Keishi Fujiwara & Varun Varghese & Makoto Chikaraishi & Takuya Maruyama & Akimasa Fujiwara, 2025. "Does response lag affect travelers’ stated preference? Evidence from a real-time stated adaptation survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 693-713, April.
    5. Raphael Piendl & Martin Koning & François Combes & Gernot Liedtke, 2022. "Building latent segments of goods to improve shipment size modeling: Confirmatory evidence from France," Post-Print hal-04117547, HAL.
    6. David A. Hensher & Edward Wei & Wen Liu & Loan Ho & Chinh Ho, 2023. "Development of a practical aggregate spatial road freight modal demand model system for truck and commodity movements with an application of a distance-based charging regime," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1031-1071, June.
    7. Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Holguín-Veras, José & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2022. "A freight origin-destination synthesis model with mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Ding, Xiaohui & Chen, Caihua & Li, Chongshou & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "Product demand estimation for vending machines using video surveillance data: A group-lasso method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Takanori Sakai & Yusuke Hara & Ravi Seshadri & Andr'e Alho & Md Sami Hasnine & Peiyu Jing & ZhiYuan Chua & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2020. "E-Commerce Delivery Demand Modeling Framework for An Agent-Based Simulation Platform," Papers 2010.14375, arXiv.org.
    10. Daniel Oviedo & Isabel Granada & Daniel Perez-Jaramillo, 2020. "Ridesourcing and Travel Demand: Potential Effects of Transportation Network Companies in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Björk, Lisa & Vierth, Inge, 2021. "Freight modal shift in Sweden – means or objective?," Working Papers 2021:5, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    12. Maya Safira & Makoto Chikaraishi, 2023. "The impact of online food delivery service on eating-out behavior: a case of Multi-Service Transport Platforms (MSTPs) in Indonesia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2253-2271, December.
    13. Jamal Alnsour & Abdullah Radwan Arabeyyat & Khalil Al-Hyari & Sakher A. I. Al-Bazaiah & Reeman Aldweik, 2023. "Enhancing City Logistics for Sustainable Development in Jordan: A Survey-Based Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Ihab Kaddoura & David Masson & Thomas Hettinger & Merlin Unterfinger, 2024. "An agent-based simulation approach to investigate the shift of Switzerland’s inland freight transport from road to rail," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1701-1722, October.
    15. Reiffer, Anna S. & Kübler, Jelle & Kagerbauer, Martin & Vortisch, Peter, 2023. "Agent-based model of last-mile parcel deliveries and travel demand incorporating online shopping behavior," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Michela Le Pira & Lisa Hansson & Svein Bråthen, 2020. "Digital Twins: A Critical Discussion on Their Potential for Supporting Policy-Making and Planning in Urban Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Shobayo, Peter & Bedoya-Maya, Felipe & van Hassel, Edwin & Vanelslander, Thierry & Christopoulou, Eva & Majoor, Ivo, 2024. "Assessing Inland Waterway Transport (IWT) container logistics on the Rhine Alpine corridor: A discrete event simulation approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Björk, Lisa & Vierth, Inge & Cullinane, Kevin, 2023. "Freight modal shift: A means or an objective in achieving lower emission targets? The case of Sweden," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 125-136.
    19. Utomo, D.S. & Gripton, A. & Greening, P., 2021. "Analysing charging strategies for electric LGV in grocery delivery operation using agent-based modelling: An initial case study in the United Kingdom," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Jing, Peiyu & Seshadri, Ravi & Sakai, Takanori & Shamshiripour, Ali & Alho, Andre Romano & Lentzakis, Antonios & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E., 2024. "Evaluating congestion pricing schemes using agent-based passenger and freight microsimulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10444-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.