IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v192y2022i3d10.1007_s11127-022-00977-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing the timing and type of state-level alcohol prohibitions prior to 1920

Author

Listed:
  • Eline Poelmans

    (KU Leuven)

  • John A. Dove

    (Troy University)

  • Jason E. Taylor

    (Central Michigan University)

  • Ranjit S. Dighe

    (State University of New York at Oswego)

Abstract

We employ a 70-year panel to examine the factors that influenced the timing and type—statutory prohibition, constitutional prohibition, or local option—of US state-level alcohol regulations in the seven decades prior to national Prohibition in 1920. We find that alcohol interests such as the state’s level of employment in breweries and distilleries, as well as the amounts of barley grown, generally impacted a state’s legal regime. Our results also suggest that states with larger concentrations of “dry” Christian denominations were more likely to prohibit, while those with more “wet” denominations were less likely to do so. Nearest neighbor effects likewise were important: states were generally more likely to pass statewide prohibitions when their neighboring states had such prohibitions in place.

Suggested Citation

  • Eline Poelmans & John A. Dove & Jason E. Taylor & Ranjit S. Dighe, 2022. "Factors influencing the timing and type of state-level alcohol prohibitions prior to 1920," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 201-226, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:192:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-022-00977-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11127-022-00977-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-022-00977-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11127-022-00977-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griffin Edwards & Travis Howe, 2015. "A test of prohibition's effect on alcohol production and consumption using crop yields," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(4), pages 1145-1168, April.
    2. Stack, Martin, 2000. "Local and Regional Breweries in America's Brewing Industry, 1865 to 1920," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 435-463, October.
    3. repec:wly:soecon:v:81:4:y:2015:p:1145-1168 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. John Dinan & Jac C. Heckelman, 2014. "Support for Repealing Prohibition: An Analysis of State-Wide Referenda on Ratifying the 21st Amendment," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(3), pages 636-651, September.
    5. Ranjit S. Dighe, 2016. "A taste for temperance: how American beer got to be so bland," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 752-784, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eline Poelmans & Sandra Rousseau, 2017. "Beer and Organic Labels: Do Belgian Consumers Care?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Choi, David Y. & Stack, Martin H., 2005. "The all-American beer: a case of inferior standard (taste) prevailing?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 79-86.
    3. Poelmans, Eline & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2011. "From Monasteries to Multinationals (and Back): A Historical Review of the Beer Economy," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 196-216, October.
    4. Poelmans, Eline & Taylor, Jason E. & Raisanen, Samuel & Holt, Andrew C., 2022. "Estimates of employment gains attributable to beer legalization in spring 1933," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:192:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-022-00977-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.