IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/openec/v14y2003i1p15-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mistreated Model: A Reply

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Carrington

    ()

Abstract

This paper addresses the issues raised by Johnston et al. (2003) in relation to the spatial econometric treatment of the gravity model of trade in Porojan (2001). We show that the findings reported there are robust to alternative specifications. Furthermore, we indicate that the proposed formulation takes spatial effects into account while separating the impact of distance from far away trading partners from the 'neighborhood effect,' particularly within regional trading blocs. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Carrington, 2003. "The Mistreated Model: A Reply," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:openec:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:15-17 DOI: 10.1023/A:1021290900364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1021290900364
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey A. Frankel & Ernesto Stein & Shang-Jin Wei, 1998. "Continental Trading Blocs: Are They Natural or Supernatural?," NBER Chapters,in: The Regionalization of the World Economy, pages 91-120 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. A. Porojan, 2001. "Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited," Open Economies Review, Springer, pages 265-280.
    3. Ron Johnston & Les Hepple & Tony Hoare & Kelvyn Jones & Paul Plummer, 2003. "The Mistreated Model: Some Technical Comments on Porojan's Paper on 'Trade Flows and Spatial Effects'," Open Economies Review, Springer, pages 11-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    spatial econometrics; gravity model;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:openec:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:15-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.