IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jtecht/v49y2024i3d10.1007_s10961-023-10013-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too much support? Entrepreneurial ecosystems and firm growth

Author

Listed:
  • Qiantao Zhang

    (Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University)

  • Shiri M. Breznitz

    (University of Toronto)

  • Steven Denney

    (University of Vienna)

Abstract

Although the concept of an entrepreneurial ecosystem has become appealing to both academics and policy makers, few studies have measured the impact of entrepreneurial ecosystems on firm growth. Using quantitative data, this paper analyzes a local innovation ecosystem to identify the contribution of a regional ecosystem to firm growth. The results indicate that firms that intensively rely on ecosystem intermediary organizations tend to experience less growth. In other words, when it comes to supporting firm growth, ‘the more the merrier’ does not apply.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiantao Zhang & Shiri M. Breznitz & Steven Denney, 2024. "Too much support? Entrepreneurial ecosystems and firm growth," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 996-1015, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:49:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10961-023-10013-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10961-023-10013-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-023-10013-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10961-023-10013-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maribel Guerrero & Jorge Espinoza-Benavides, 2021. "Does entrepreneurship ecosystem influence business re-entries after failure?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 211-227, March.
    2. Shiri M. Breznitz & Qiantao Zhang, 2020. "Determinants of graduates’ entrepreneurial activity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1039-1056, December.
    3. Erik Stam, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1759-1769, September.
    4. Ben Spigel, 2017. "The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 49-72, January.
    5. Maribel Guerrero & Francisco Liñán & F. Rafael Cáceres-Carrasco, 2021. "The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1733-1759, December.
    6. Hanna Hottenrott & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2016. "Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 197-217, April.
    7. Annalisa Croce & Elisa Ughetto & Stefano Bonini & Vincenzo Capizzi, 2021. "Gazelles, ponies, and the impact of business angels’ characteristics on firm growth," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(2), pages 223-248, March.
    8. Shiri M. Breznitz & Paige A. Clayton & Daniela Defazio & Kimberley R. Isett, 2018. "Have you been served? The impact of university entrepreneurial support on start-ups’ network formation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 343-367, April.
    9. Spyros Arvanitis & Tobias Stucki, 2012. "What determines the innovation capability of firm founders?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(4), pages 1049-1084, August.
    10. Michael C. Withers & Paul Louis Drnevich & Louis Marino, 2011. "Doing More with Less: The Disordinal Implications of Firm Age for Leveraging Capabilities for Innovation Activity," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 515-536, October.
    11. Mayer, Colin, 2002. "Financing the New Economy: financial institutions and corporate governance," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 311-326, June.
    12. Ethan Gifford & Maureen McKelvey & Rögnvaldur Saemundsson, 2021. "The evolution of knowledge-intensive innovation ecosystems: co-evolving entrepreneurial activity and innovation policy in the West Swedish maritime system," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 651-676, May.
    13. Maryann P. Feldman & Nichola J. Lowe, 2011. "Restructuring for Resilience," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 6(1), pages 129-146, January.
    14. Mike Wright & Donald S. Siegel & Philippe Mustar, 2017. "An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 909-922, August.
    15. Watson, Warren & Stewart, Wayne Jr. & BarNir, Anat, 2003. "The effects of human capital, organizational demography, and interpersonal processes on venture partner perceptions of firm profit and growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 145-164, March.
    16. Bruderl, Josef & Preisendorfer, Peter, 1998. "Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 213-225, May.
    17. Shiri M Breznitz & Qiantao Zhang, 2019. "Fostering the growth of student start-ups from university accelerators: an entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 855-873.
    18. Mann, Ronald J. & Sager, Thomas W., 2007. "Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 193-208, March.
    19. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca, 2005. "Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 795-816, August.
    20. Ethan Gifford & Guido Buenstorf & Daniel Ljungberg & Maureen McKelvey & Olof Zaring, 2021. "Variety in founder experience and the performance of knowledge-intensive innovative firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 677-713, April.
    21. Georg Reischauer & Wolfgang H. Güttel & Elke Schüssler, 2021. "Aligning the design of intermediary organisations with the ecosystem," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 594-619, May.
    22. Maryann Feldman & Donald S Siegel & Mike Wright, 2019. "New developments in innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 817-826.
    23. Scott Shane, 2001. "Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 205-220, February.
    24. Mingfeng Tang & Hao Huang & Grace Walsh & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "The impact of entrepreneurial overconfidence on incubator effectiveness," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 416-440, February.
    25. Scott Shane, 2012. "The Importance of Angel Investing in Financing the Growth of Entrepreneurial Ventures," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(02), pages 1-42.
    26. Sang-Tae Kim & Moon-Gi Jeong, 2014. "Discovering the genesis and role of an intermediate organization in an industrial cluster: focusing on CONNECT of San Diego," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 143-159, April.
    27. Michael Peneder, 2009. "The impact of venture capital on innovation behaviour and firm growth," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 83-107, November.
    28. Samuel Lee & Petra Persson, 2016. "Financing from Family and Friends," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(9), pages 2341-2386.
    29. Hall, Bronwyn H & Ziedonis, Rosemarie Ham, 2001. "The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 32(1), pages 101-128, Spring.
    30. Maximilian Zedtwitz & Rosa Grimaldi, 2006. "Are Service Profiles Incubator-Specific? Results from an Empirical Investigation in Italy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 459-468, July.
    31. Helmers, Christian & Rogers, Mark, 2011. "Does patenting help high-tech start-ups?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 1016-1027, September.
    32. Pei-Chou Lin & Deng-Shing Huang, 2008. "Technological Regimes and Firm Survival: Evidence Across Sectors and Over Time," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 175-186, February.
    33. Agarwal, Rajshree & Gort, Michael, 1996. "The Evolution of Markets and Entry, Exit and Survival of Firms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 78(3), pages 489-498, August.
    34. Marco Cucculelli, 2018. "Firm age and the probability of product innovation. Do CEO tenure and product tenure matter?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 153-179, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    2. Maria Patrocínia Correia & Carla Susana Marques & Rui Silva & Veland Ramadani, 2024. "Academic Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17498-17528, December.
    3. Jianhong Zhang & Désirée Gorp & Henk Kievit, 2023. "Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1077-1105, June.
    4. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    5. Sara Amoroso & Albert N. Link, 2021. "Intellectual property protection mechanisms and the characteristics of founding teams," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7329-7350, September.
    6. Matthew Good & Mirjam Knockaert & Birthe Soppe, 2020. "A typology of technology transfer ecosystems: how structure affects interactions at the science–market divide," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1405-1431, October.
    7. Masucci, Monica & Camerani, Roberto & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Scarlata, Mariarosa, 2024. "How do accelerators emerge and develop in entrepreneurial universities?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Guerrero, Maribel & Siegel, Donald S., 2024. "Schumpeter meets Teece: Proposed metrics for assessing entrepreneurial innovation and dynamic capabilities in entrepreneurial ecosystems in an emerging economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    9. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2022. "Reprint of: Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    10. David B. Audretsch & Indu Khurana & Dev K. Dutta & Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada, 2025. "Creating effective university innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems: a commitment system perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 169-191, February.
    11. Helen Lawton Smith & Jonathan Potter, 2022. "Applying the entrepreneurial ecosystem concept to regional entrepreneurship policy analysis – a critique," Working Papers 61, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Jun 2022.
    12. Masatoshi Kato & Koichiro Onishi & Yuji Honjo, 2022. "Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 449-475, August.
    13. Massimo G. Colombo & Benedetta Montanaro & Silvio Vismara, 2023. "What drives the valuation of entrepreneurial ventures? A map to navigate the literature and research directions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 59-84, June.
    14. Mirella Schrijvers & Niels Bosma & Erik Stam, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Structural Change in European Regions," Working Papers 2202, Utrecht School of Economics.
    15. Kuebart, Andreas, 2022. "Open creative labs as functional infrastructure for entrepreneurial ecosystems: Using sequence analysis to explore tempo-spatial trajectories of startups in Berlin," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    16. Prokop, Daniel, 2021. "University entrepreneurial ecosystems and spinoff companies: Configurations, developments and outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    17. Huang, Shuangfa & Battisti, Martina & Pickernell, David, 2023. "The roles of innovation strategy and founding team diversity in new venture growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Mikko Koria & Roberto Osorno-Hinojosa & Delia del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez & Antonius van den Broek, 2022. "One World, Two Ideas and Three Adaptations: Innovation Intermediaries Enabling Sustainable Open Innovation in University–Industry Collaboration in Finland, Mexico and Nicaragua," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Mariana Pita & Joana Costa & António Carrizo Moreira, 2021. "Unveiling Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’ Transformation: A GEM Based Portrait," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Hannigan, Timothy R. & Briggs, Anthony R. & Valadao, Rodrigo & Seidel, Marc-David L. & Jennings, P. Devereaux, 2022. "A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging AI entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accelerators; Entrepreneurial ecosystems; Firm growth; Incubators; Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:49:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10961-023-10013-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.