IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v72y2007i1p27-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties of the Reidenbach–Robin Multidimensional Ethics Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Joan McMahon
  • Robert Harvey

Abstract

The factor structure of the Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES; Reidenbach and Robin: 1988 , Journal of Business Ethics 7, 871–879; 1990 , Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639–653) was examined for the 8-item short form (N = 328) and the original 30-item pool (N = 260). The objectives of the study were: to verify the dimensionality of the MES; to increase the amount of true cross-scenario variance through the use of 18 scenarios varying in moral intensity (Jones: 1991 , Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395); and, to examine the items for measurement precision using item-response theory (IRT) methods. Results of confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis failed to conclusively support the hypothesized 3- (short form) or 5-factor (long form) structure; both instruments were instead dominated by a general factor. Item response theory analyses using Samejima’s ( 1969 , Psychometrika Monograph Supplement 34, (4, Pt. 2)) graded response model revealed that many items in the 30-item pool performed very well, and suggested that a different collection of items be used to form a short-form version of the MES. Our proposed 10-item instrument includes more discriminating items than the 8-item version, and has the added advantage of including two items from each of the five ethical philosophies represented in the original 30-item pool. Copyright Springer 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Joan McMahon & Robert Harvey, 2007. "Psychometric Properties of the Reidenbach–Robin Multidimensional Ethics Scale," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 27-39, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:72:y:2007:i:1:p:27-39
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9153-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-006-9153-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-006-9153-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ledyard Tucker & Raymond Koopman & Robert Linn, 1969. "Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(4), pages 421-459, December.
    2. Robert Linn, 1968. "A monte carlo approach to the number of factors problem," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(1), pages 37-71, March.
    3. Street, Marc D. & Douglas, Scott C. & Geiger, Scott W. & Martinko, Mark J., 2001. "The Impact of Cognitive Expenditure on the Ethical Decision-Making Process: The Cognitive Elaboration Model," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 256-277, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 575-597, July.
    2. Ed Love & Tara Ceranic Salinas & Jeff D. Rotman, 2020. "The Ethical Standards of Judgment Questionnaire: Development and Validation of Independent Measures of Formalism and Consequentialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 115-132, January.
    3. Heinz, Philip & Patel, Chris & Hellmann, Andreas, 2013. "Some theoretical and methodological suggestions for studies examining accountants' professional judgments and earnings management," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 299-311.
    4. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Dilemmas, Conspiracies, and Sophie’s Choice: Vignette Themes and Ethical Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 639-653, December.
    5. Eileen Taylor & Mary Curtis, 2010. "An Examination of the Layers of Workplace Influences in Ethical Judgments: Whistleblowing Likelihood and Perseverance in Public Accounting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 21-37, April.
    6. Tracy Manly & Lori Leonard & Cynthia Riemenschneider, 2015. "Academic Integrity in the Information Age: Virtues of Respect and Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 579-590, March.
    7. Charles Schwepker & David Good, 2011. "Moral Judgment and its Impact on Business-to-Business Sales Performance and Customer Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 609-625, February.
    8. Peter Mudrack & James Bloodgood & William Turnley, 2012. "Some Ethical Implications of Individual Competitiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 347-359, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ronald Gunderson & Pin Ng, 2006. "Summarizing the Effect of a Wide Array of Amenity Measures into Simple Components," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 313-335, November.
    2. Hales, Jeffrey & Moon, James R. & Swenson, Laura A., 2018. "A new era of voluntary disclosure? Empirical evidence on how employee postings on social media relate to future corporate disclosures," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 88-108.
    3. Luippold, Benjamin L. & Kida, Thomas & Piercey, M. David & Smith, James F., 2015. "Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 39-54.
    4. Minardi, Andrea Maria Accioly Fonseca & Sanvicente, Antônio Zoratto, 2006. "Análise da Série Histórica de Prêmios Pelo Risco de Mercado Estimados pelo Modelo de Dividendos Descontados," Insper Working Papers wpe_66, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    5. Foss, Tron & Jöreskog, Karl G. & Olsson, Ulf H., 2011. "Testing structural equation models: The effect of kurtosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2263-2275, July.
    6. Mark S. Schwartz, 2016. "Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 755-776, December.
    7. Donald G. Morrison & Hugh Michael Stevenson, 1971. "Political instability in independent black Africa: more dimensions of conflict behavior within nations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(3), pages 347-368, September.
    8. Gino, Francesca & Schweitzer, Maurice E. & Mead, Nicole L. & Ariely, Dan, 2011. "Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 191-203, July.
    9. Edoardo Saccenti & Marieke E. Timmerman, 2017. "Considering Horn’s Parallel Analysis from a Random Matrix Theory Point of View," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 186-209, March.
    10. Joan McMahon & Robert Harvey, 2007. "The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 335-357, June.
    11. Chase Thiel & Zhanna Bagdasarov & Lauren Harkrider & James Johnson & Michael Mumford, 2012. "Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 49-64, April.
    12. Alexander Robitzsch, 2022. "Comparing the Robustness of the Structural after Measurement (SAM) Approach to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) against Local Model Misspecifications with Alternative Estimation Approaches," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-42, July.
    13. Lee, Hae Young & Bonn, Mark A. & Reid, Earl L. & Kim, Woo Gon, 2017. "Differences in tourist ethical judgment and responsible tourism intention: An ethical scenario approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 298-307.
    14. Adam Barsky, 2008. "Understanding the Ethical Cost of Organizational Goal-Setting: A Review and Theory Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 63-81, August.
    15. Donald G. McTavish & James D. Cleary & Edward E. Brent & Lauri Perman & Kjell R. Knudsen, 1977. "Assessing Research Methodology," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 3-44, August.
    16. George Barnett & Joseph Woelfel, 1979. "On the dimensionality of psychological processes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 215-232, June.
    17. repec:pab:wpbsad:12.03 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. William Strout, 1990. "A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 293-325, June.
    19. Karen Niven & Colm Healy, 2016. "Susceptibility to the ‘Dark Side’ of Goal-Setting: Does Moral Justification Influence the Effect of Goals on Unethical Behavior?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 115-127, August.
    20. Garland, Ann F. & Saltzman, Marla D. & Aarons, Gregory A., 2000. "Adolescent satisfaction with mental health services: development of a multidimensional scale," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 165-175, May.
    21. Ajimon George, 2017. "Precautions for Safe Use of Internet Banking: Scale Development and Validation," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 6(2), pages 186-195, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:72:y:2007:i:1:p:27-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.