IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v140y2017i1d10.1007_s10551-015-2688-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intuition, Analysis and Reflection in Business Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Provis

    (University of South Australia)

Abstract

The paper aim draws together two ideas that have figured in different strands of discussion in business ethics: the ideas of intuition and of reflection. They are considered in company with the third, complementary, idea of analysis. It is argued that the interplay amongst these is very important in business ethics. The relationship amongst the three ideas can be understood by reference to parts of modern cognitive psychology, including dual-process theory and the Social Intuitionist Model. Intuition can be misleading when based on fast and frugal heuristics, and reasoning needs social exchange if it is to support moral judgment effectively, but in the complex institutional environment of business, reflection and analysis can underpin social communication and feedback to develop sound intuition. Reflection and analysis are both more deliberate, systematic judgment processes than intuition, but are distinguished by the fact that reflection embraces hypothetical thinking and imagination, while analysis is careful, step-by-step reasoning. Examples of business ethics problems illustrate the need for both of these processes, and also suggest how they themselves can be enhanced in the same social exchange process that underpins the development of good intuition.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Provis, 2017. "Intuition, Analysis and Reflection in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 5-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:140:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2688-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2688-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-015-2688-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-015-2688-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadler-Smith, Eugene, 2012. "Before Virtue: Biology, Brain, Behavior, and the “Moral Sense”," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 351-376, April.
    2. Salvador, Rommel & Folger, Robert G., 2009. "Business Ethics and the Brain: Rommel Salvador and Robert G. Folger," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 1-31, January.
    3. Heidi Weltzien Hoivik, 2009. "Developing Students’ Competence for Ethical Reflection While Attending Business School," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 5-9, August.
    4. Chris Provis, 2010. "Virtuous Decision Making for Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 3-16, February.
    5. Michael Behnam & Andreas Rasche, 2009. "‘Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?’ – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 79-88, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clot, Sophie & Grolleau, Gilles & Ibanez, Lisette, 2022. "A reference point bias in judging cheaters," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Christian Julmi, 2024. "Analysis and Intuition Effectiveness in Moral Problems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 179-193, April.
    3. Farrow, Katherine & Grolleau, Gilles & Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2021. "‘Let's call a spade a spade, not a gardening tool’: How euphemisms shape moral judgement in corporate social responsibility domains," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 254-267.
    4. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Hauser, 2019. "Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti-corruption Training Make Any Difference?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 281-299, September.
    2. Joseph McManus, 2021. "Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 153-168, February.
    3. Michaela Haase & Emmanuel Raufflet, 2017. "Ideologies in Markets, Organizations, and Business Ethics: Drafting a Map: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 629-639, June.
    4. Irene Chu & Geoff Moore, 2020. "From Harmony to Conflict: MacIntyrean Virtue Ethics in a Confucian Tradition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 221-239, August.
    5. Nilupulee Liyanagamage & Mario Fernando & Belinda Gibbons, 2023. "The Emotional Machiavellian: Interactions Between Leaders and Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 657-673, September.
    6. Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez & Amparo Soler-Domínguez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2016. "Ethical strategy focus and mutual fund management: performance and persistence," Working Papers 2016/01, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    7. Marc Orlitzky, 2017. "How Cognitive Neuroscience Informs a Subjectivist-Evolutionary Explanation of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 717-732, September.
    8. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Jean Pasquero & Jean-François Chanlat, 2011. "Managerial Responsibility as Negotiated Order: A Social Construction Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 17-31, March.
    9. Claudius Bachmann & Laura Sasse & Andre Habisch, 2018. "Applying the Practical Wisdom Lenses in Decision-Making: An Integrative Approach to Humanistic Management," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 125-150, February.
    10. Sylvia D’souza & Lucas D. Introna, 2024. "Recovering Aristotle’s Practice-Based Ontology: Practical Wisdom as Embodied Ethical Intuition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 287-300, January.
    11. Khuram Shahzad & Ying Hong & Alan Muller & Marco DeSisto & Farheen Rizvi, 2024. "An Investigation of the Relationship Between Ethics-Oriented HRM Systems, Moral Attentiveness, and Deviant Workplace Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 591-608, July.
    12. Stacey Sanders & Barbara Wisse & Nico W. Yperen & Diana Rus, 2018. "On Ethically Solvent Leaders: The Roles of Pride and Moral Identity in Predicting Leader Ethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 631-645, July.
    13. Egels-Zandén, Niklas, 2016. "Not made in China: Integration of social sustainability into strategy at Nudie Jeans Co," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-51.
    14. Steven Steyl, 2020. "Aristotelian Practical Wisdom in Business Ethics: Two Neglected Components," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 417-428, May.
    15. James Swaim & Michael Maloni & Stuart Napshin & Amy Henley, 2014. "Influences on Student Intention and Behavior Toward Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 465-484, October.
    16. Lori Verstegen Ryan, 2017. "Sex Differences Through a Neuroscience Lens: Implications for Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 771-782, September.
    17. Mar Pérezts & Jean-Philippe Bouilloud & Vincent Gaulejac, 2011. "Serving Two Masters: The Contradictory Organization as an Ethical Challenge for Managerial Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 33-44, March.
    18. Yun Liu & Greg. G. Wang & Yu Chen, 2019. "Why Are Corporations Willing to Take on Public CSR? An Organizational Traits Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Rachel E. Sturm, 2017. "Decreasing Unethical Decisions: The Role of Morality-Based Individual Differences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 37-57, April.
    20. Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa Ames & Mauricio Custódio Serafim, 2023. "Multiple Cases of Pro-life Volunteering in a Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Approach," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 210315-2103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:140:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2688-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.