IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v22y2019i4d10.1007_s10729-018-9457-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the efficiency of the operating room environment with an optimization and machine learning model

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Fairley

    (Stanford University)

  • David Scheinker

    (Stanford University
    Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford)

  • Margaret L. Brandeau

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

The operating room is a major cost and revenue center for most hospitals. Thus, more effective operating room management and scheduling can provide significant benefits. In many hospitals, the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), where patients recover after their surgical procedures, is a bottleneck. If the PACU reaches capacity, patients must wait in the operating room until the PACU has available space, leading to delays and possible cancellations for subsequent operating room procedures. We develop a generalizable optimization and machine learning approach to sequence operating room procedures to minimize delays caused by PACU unavailability. Specifically, we use machine learning to estimate the required PACU time for each type of surgical procedure, we develop and solve two integer programming models to schedule procedures in the operating rooms to minimize maximum PACU occupancy, and we use discrete event simulation to compare our optimized schedule to the existing schedule. Using data from Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, we show that the scheduling system can significantly reduce operating room delays caused by PACU congestion while still keeping operating room utilization high: simulation of the second half of 2016 shows that our model could have reduced total PACU holds by 76% without decreasing operating room utilization. We are currently working on implementing the scheduling system at the hospital.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Fairley & David Scheinker & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2019. "Improving the efficiency of the operating room environment with an optimization and machine learning model," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 756-767, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:22:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-018-9457-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-018-9457-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-018-9457-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-018-9457-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Rod Butchers & Paul R. Day & Andrew P. Goldie & Stephen Miller & Jeff A. Meyer & David M. Ryan & Amanda C. Scott & Chris A. Wallace, 2001. "Optimized Crew Scheduling at Air New Zealand," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 30-56, February.
    2. Maya Bam & Brian T. Denton & Mark P. Van Oyen & Mark E. Cowen, 2017. "Surgery scheduling with recovery resources," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(10), pages 942-955, October.
    3. Chuck Holland & Jack Levis & Ranganath Nuggehalli & Bob Santilli & Jeff Winters, 2017. "UPS Optimizes Delivery Routes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 8-23, February.
    4. Ada Y. Barlatt & Amy Cohn & Oleg Gusikhin & Yakov Fradkin & Rich Davidson & John Batey, 2012. "Ford Motor Company Implements Integrated Planning and Scheduling in a Complex Automotive Manufacturing Environment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 478-491, October.
    5. Sandeep Rath & Kumar Rajaram & Aman Mahajan, 2017. "Integrated Anesthesiologist and Room Scheduling for Surgeries: Methodology and Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1460-1478, December.
    6. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Shi & Saied Mahdian & Jose Blanchet & Peter Glynn & Andrew Y. Shin & David Scheinker, 2023. "Surgical scheduling via optimization and machine learning with long-tailed data," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 692-718, December.
    2. Azar, Macarena & Carrasco, Rodrigo A. & Mondschein, Susana, 2022. "Dealing with uncertain surgery times in operating room scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 377-394.
    3. Michael R. Johnson & Hiten Naik & Wei Siang Chan & Jesse Greiner & Matt Michaleski & Dong Liu & Bruno Silvestre & Ian P. McCarthy, 2023. "Forecasting ward-level bed requirements to aid pandemic resource planning: Lessons learned and future directions," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 477-500, September.
    4. Aleida Braaksma & Martin S. Copenhaver & Ana C. Zenteno & Elizabeth Ugarph & Retsef Levi & Bethany J. Daily & Benjamin Orcutt & Kathryn M. Turcotte & Peter F. Dunn, 2023. "Evaluation and implementation of a Just-In-Time bed-assignment strategy to reduce wait times for surgical inpatients," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 501-515, September.
    5. David Scheinker & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2020. "Implementing Analytics Projects in a Hospital: Successes, Failures, and Opportunities," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 176-189, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    2. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Sandeep Rath & Kumar Rajaram, 2022. "Staff Planning for Hospitals with Implicit Cost Estimation and Stochastic Optimization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    4. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Wang, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2019. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for surgery block allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 740-753.
    7. Yanbo Ma & Kaiyue Liu & Zheng Li & Xiang Chen, 2022. "Robust Operating Room Scheduling Model with Violation Probability Consideration under Uncertain Surgery Duration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Seokjun Youn & H. Neil Geismar & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4407-4423, December.
    9. Hessam Bavafa & Charles M. Leys & Lerzan Örmeci & Sergei Savin, 2019. "Managing Portfolio of Elective Surgical Procedures: A Multidimensional Inverse Newsvendor Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1543-1563, November.
    10. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Michael R. Miller & Robert J. Alexander & Vincent A. Arbige & Robert F. Dell & Steven R. Kremer & Brian P. McClune & Jane E. Oppenlander & Joshua P. Tomlin, 2017. "Optimal Allocation of Students to Naval Nuclear-Power Training Units," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 320-335, August.
    12. Schmid, Verena & Doerner, Karl F. & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 435-448.
    13. Song, Kwonsik & Kim, Sooyoung & Park, Moonseo & Lee, Hyun-Soo, 2017. "Energy efficiency-based course timetabling for university buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 394-405.
    14. Antti Peltokorpi, 2011. "How do strategic decisions and operative practices affect operating room productivity?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 370-382, November.
    15. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    16. repec:ipg:wpaper:14 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Mehran Hojati, 2010. "Near-optimal solution to an employee assignment problem with seniority," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 539-557, December.
    18. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    19. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    20. Gréanne Leeftink & Erwin W. Hans, 2018. "Case mix classification and a benchmark set for surgery scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 17-33, February.
    21. Rachuba, Sebastian & Imhoff, Lisa & Werners, Brigitte, 2022. "Tactical blueprints for surgical weeks – An integrated approach for operating rooms and intensive care units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 243-260.
    22. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:22:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-018-9457-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.